SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6): 59-65.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Institutional Isomorphism and Heteromorphism of Social Work Organization under the Project Mechanism: Taking Social Work Agencies in Guangdong Province as an Example

FANG Ying, ZHU Junrong   

  1. Public Administration School, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou Guangdong, 516000, China
  • Received:2018-03-21 Online:2018-11-15 Published:2018-11-15

PDF (PC)

2111

Abstract: The project mechanism has begun to become the common form for the central government to mobilize the enthusiasm of the grassroots government since the 1990s, which introduced the market competition mechanism to activate the bureaucracy and the grassroots governments as the carriers received much research attention. Since 2007, Social Work Organization (SWO) is fostered by government purchase social work service project, which becomes the new carrier of project mechanisms besides the grassroots government in bureaucracy mechanism. The paper analyses the influence of bureaucracy and market mechanism to the institutional isomorphism of SWO, and how some SWOs innovate and seek differentiation development.

Key words: project mechanism, social organization, bureaucracy, market mechanism, institutional isomorphism

CLC Number: 

  • C913
[1] 周雪光. 项目制:一个"控制权"理论视角[J]. 开放时代, 2015(2):82-102.
[2] 付伟, 焦长权. "协调型"政权:项目制运作下的乡镇政府[J]. 社会学研究, 2015(2):98-123.
[3] 黄宗智, 龚为纲, 高原. "项目制"的运作机制和效果是"合理化"吗?[J]. 开放时代, 2014(5):143-159.
[4] 尹利民. 也论项目制的运作与效果——兼与黄宗智等先生商榷[J]. 开放时代, 2015(2):143-156.
[5] 陈家建. 项目制与基层政府动员——对社会管理项目化运作的社会学考察[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(2):64-79.
[6] 杜春林, 张新文. 从制度安排到实际运行:项目制的生存逻辑与两难处境[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015(1):82-88.
[7] 姚荣. 大学治理的"项目制":成效、限度及其反思[J]. 江苏高教, 2014(3):12-16.
[8] 方英. 政府培育下的社工机构发展[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2016.
[9] 史普原. 政府组织间的权责配置——兼论"项目制"[J]. 社会学研究, 2016(2):123-148.
[10] PAUL J. The iron cage revisited:institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American sociological review, 1983, 48(2):147-160.
[11] 折晓叶, 陈婴婴. 项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑——对"项目进村"案例的社会学分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(4):126-148.
[12] 渠敬东, 周飞舟, 应星. 从总体支配到技术治理——基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2009(6):104-127.
[13] 陈水生. 项目制的执行过程与运作逻辑——对文化惠民工程的政策学考察[J]. 公共行政评论, 2014(3):133-156.
[14] 社工中国网. 2017年度百强社会工作服务机构评选工作通知[EB/OL].[2017-10-26]. http://www.sohu.com/a/200435679_280188.
[15] 广东省民政厅. 广东省社会工作十年发展报告[EB/OL].[2016-11-08]. http://www.gdsgs.org/news/gd/2260.html.
[16] 林洁. 广东持证社工达6.5万社工机构1406家居全国首位[EB/OL].[2018-3-26]. http://trade.swchina.org/trends/2018/0326/31022.shtml.
[17] 渠敬东. 项目制:一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(5):113-130.
[18] 王向民. 中国社会组织的项目制治理[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2014(5):130-140.
[19] BECKERT J. Institutional isomorphism revisited:convergence and divergence in institutional change[J]. Sociological theory, 2010, 28(2):150-166.
[20] RAMANATH R. Limits to institutional isomorphism:examining internal processes in NGO——government interactions[J]. Nonprofit & voluntary sector quarterly, 2007, 38(1):51-76.
[1] ZHU Hao, XU Shuhong. The Dilemma and Mechanism Innovation of Social Organizations Participating in the Supply of Children’s Welfare Services: A Case Study of Shanghai [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 70-78.
[2] CHEN Jing. External and Internal Forces: Analysis of Access to Opportunities for Social Organizations to Participate in Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(1): 69-77.
[3] ZHUO Caiqin, ZHANG Xuehui, ZHANG Qianxin. The Path of Social Organizations for the Disabled to Participate in Social Governance: A Case Study Based on Guangdong Association of the Blind [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 50-60.
[4] QIN Qing, LIANG Lihong, Li Debo. Mechanism Exploration on Resource Integration of Social Organizations in Child Protection from the Perspective of Organizational Field [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(2): 59-67.
[5] ZHANG Chao, ZHANG Jiayuan. Employee Expectations, Organizational Accountability and Legitimacy: The Establishment of Internal Legitimacy in Social Service Organizations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(2): 68-75,84.
[6] LI Ling'ou. Hierarchical Governance and Organizational Legitimacy: The Dual Logic and Realization Methods for Social Organizations to Coordinate Response to Emergencies [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(6): 78-88.
[7] FANG Ying. Cooperation with Boundary: The New Relationship between Social Work Organization, the Subdistrict Office and the Neighborhood Committee [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 58-68.
[8] ZHU Yuanyuan. Folded Relationship: Real Space and Practice Path of Social Organizations Participating in Urban Grassroots Governance: Taking Government Purchase Social Work Services in G City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 69-77,96.
[9] ZHOU Ling, DU Juan. Current Status and Influencing Factors of Financial Literacy of Chinese NGO Workers: Based on the Results of 956 Questionnaires in 31 provinces, City and Autonompus Region in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(2): 32-40.
[10] GU Jiang-xia. Exploring the Forming Process of “Community, Social Organizations and Social Workers” Joint Action Mechanism in Urban Community: Based on the Experience of a Pilot Plan in S City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 86-92.
[11] LIU Yuzhen, YANG Jie. The Application of Three Social Organizations Linkage in Foreigners’ Social Management and Social Service: The Experience of Guangzhou [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(4): 73-79.
[12] JING Shijie, ZHAO Ping. An Action Research of Social Organization Participating in Comprehensive Poverty Alleviation in Chinese Western Rural Area: Taking Z Village of Y County in Gansu Province as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 26-34,61.
[13] CHEN Beili, WU Tong. The Practice of the Socialization of Special Social Care under the New Situation: Social Work Intervention for Retired Military Personnel in Pudong [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(6): 5-12.
[14] CAI Xiang, CHEN Sheying. NGO and Social Development: Social Organization, Community Building and Grassroots Social Governance in the Post-Economic State Era [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(3): 72-77.
[15] LIU Zhen, ZHU Zhiwei. Objectives and Structure: Typological Analysis of Community Social Organizations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(2): 72-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Social Work and Management
Add：729 East Dongfeng RD., Guangzhou PRC.
Tel：020-37627489 Fax：020-37626653 Email：shgzygl@gdut.edu.cn
Supported:Beijing Magtech