SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 14-23.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

From Non-institutionalized Multiple Collaboration to Performance-based Cooperation: Bottleneck of Welfare Management of Children in Distress and Its Breakthrough

JI Wenxiao, LI Erpeng   

  1. Research Center of Teenager Issues, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan, 453002, China
  • Received:2020-01-08 Online:2020-05-15 Published:2020-05-20

Abstract: At present, the interaction of multiple welfare subjects of children in distress presents the characteristics of non-institutionalized multiple cooperation: lack of sophisticated planning for certain individual projects from the government, insufficient macro guidance and depth of family needs assessment, and the inadequate communication and coordination among relevant parties. Most services provided by the government purchase are supportive ones that offer insufficient developmental and preventive services for families. Under the restricted service role preferences and concepts like “advocacy is confrontation”, the advocacy function is limited. In the cooperative delivery between the community and the family, the over-administration of the community restricts the direct service to the family. In view of the limited supply of welfare resources, more service supply should be released through advocacy and other forms. The diversification and connection of welfare supply present the bottleneck that the supply side needs to break through. In view of the tension amid the demand assessment, the identity identification and the service supply, it is necessary to promote a systematic connection scheme and a “performance-based cooperation model” among multiple welfare subjects.

Key words: welfare management, children in distress, collaboration, performance-based cooperation

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 民政部. 2018年民政事业发展统计公报[EB/OL]. [2019-08-15]. http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/sj/tjgb/201908/20190800018807.shtml.
[2] 宋岩. 民政部举行事实无人抚养儿童保障工作专题发布会[EB/OL]. (2019-07-10). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/10/content_5407971.htm.
[3] 徐进. 中国福利治理的理论认知: 概念界定与理念取向[J]. 安徽行政学院学报, 2019(5): 42-46
[4] JESSOP B. The changing governance of welfare: Recent trends in its primary functions, scale, and modes of coordination[J]. Social policy & administration, 1999, 33(4): 5
[5] BODE I. Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in western Europe[J]. Journal of European social policy, 2006, 16(4): 346-359
[6] 钱宁. 多方参与的社会治理创新: 发展社会福利的新路径[J]. 山东社会科学, 2014(9): 73-77
[7] 俞可平. 治理与善治[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2000: 7-8.
[8] 张虎祥, 仇立平. 社会治理辨析: 一个多元的概念[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2015(1): 63-71
[9] 范斌. 中国儿童福利制度重构与福利治理之可能[J]. 预防青少年犯罪研究, 2014(5): 76-80, 22
[10] 赵怀娟, 刘玥. 多元复合与福利治理: 老年人长期照护服务供给探析[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2016(1): 45-51
[11] 雷丽娜. 民政部举行困境儿童保障政策专题新闻发布会[EB/OL]. (2016-06-17). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-06/17/content_5083209.htm.
[12] 国务院. 国务院关于加强困境儿童保障工作的意见[EB/OL]. (2016-06-16). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-06/16/content_5082800.htm.
[13] 高丽茹, 彭华民. 中国困境儿童研究轨迹: 概念、政策和主题[J]. 江海学刊, 2015(4): 111-117
[14] 郅玉玲, 李一. 困境儿童分类保障机制研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2019: 6-8.
[15] 孟亚男. 困境儿童分类保障制度研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018: 10-13.
[16] 高丽茹, 万国威. 福利治理视阈下城市困境儿童的福利提供——基于南京市FH街道的个案研究[J]. 学术研究, 2019(4): 56-63, 113
[17] 姚建龙. 困境儿童保障研究: 主要以上海市为例[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2018: 11-15.
[18] 高丽茹. 福利治理视角下城市困境儿童的福利提供[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2019: 13-17.
[19] 胡子君. 农村困境儿童福利制度研究[M]. 河北: 燕山大学出版社, 2014: 20-23.
[20] 杨雄. 我国儿童社会政策建设的几个基本问题[J]. 当代青年研究, 2011(1): 1-6
[21] 尚晓援, 王小林, 陶传进. 中国儿童福利前沿问题[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2010: 102.
[22] 程福财. 家庭、国家与儿童福利供给[J]. 青年研究, 2012(1): 50-56, 95
[23] 民政部. 民政部关于开展未成年人社会保护试点工作的通知[EB/OL]. (2013-05-06). http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/zwgkltzl/201305/20130500456869.shtml.
[24] 郑州市政府. 困境未成年人社会保护试点工作实施方案[EB/OL]. [2019-12-14]. http://public.zhengzhou.gov.cn/16ABZ/64722.jhtml.
[25] 河南省民政厅. 关于加强困境儿童保障工作的实施意见[EB/OL]. (2017-04-11). https://www.henan.gov.cn/2017/04-11/248894.html.
[26] 郭思源. 大型社会工作服务项目成效评估的实践研究——以“大爱之行”项目为例[J]. 社会福利(理论版), 2019(6): 43-50, 57
[27] KAMINSKI L, WALMSLEY C. The advocacy brief: A guide for social workers[J]. The social worker, 1995(63): 53-58
[28] TAYLOR E D. From issue to action: An advocacy program model[M]. Lancaster, PA: Family Service, 1987: 85-86.
[29] HEPWORTH D H, ROONEY R H, LARSEN J A. Direct social work practice: Theory and skills[M]. 5th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1997: 15-17.
[30] PATTI R J. Limitation and prospects of internal advocacy[J]. Social casework, 1974(55): 537-545
[31] 王义. 构建社会组织与社区居委会的长效合作机制[J]. 山东行政学院学报, 2015(3): 38-41
[32] 匡梦叶. 项目制视角下城市社区建设研究——以广州市幸福社区建设为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019(6): 93-101
[33] 顾江霞. 城市社区“三社联动”机制形成过程探析——基于S市“三社联动”试点社区推进的经验研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019(6): 86-92
[34] 中国文化大学社会福利学系. 社会福利策划与管理[M]. 台北: 扬智文化事业股份有限公司, 2002: 174.
[35] 林万亿, 刘灿宏. 台湾身心障碍者权益与福利[M]台北: 五南图书出版股份有限公司, 2014: 263.
[36] 国务院办公厅. 关于同意建立农村留守儿童关爱保护和困境儿童保障工作部际联席会议制度的函[EB/OL]. (2018-08-21). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-08/21/content_5315377.htm.
[37] 万育维. 社会工作专业与儿童福利[J]. 社区发展季刊, 1998(81): 49-65
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!