SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 72-77.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

NGO and Social Development: Social Organization, Community Building and Grassroots Social Governance in the Post-Economic State Era

CAI Xiang1, CHEN Sheying2,3   

  1. 1. The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas, 75080, USA;
    2. School of Social Science of Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China;
    3. Pace University, New York, 10038, USA
  • Received:2017-11-01 Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-11

Abstract: The 19th CPC National Congress made a new definition of the basic social conflict, marking a shift of China's general public policy to a higher level. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), as the third element apart from the state and the market, is the essential carrier for the fulfillment of sufficient and even development strategy, furthering social equality, public welfare and participation. In community construction and grass-root social governance, social organizations should improve their qualities & professionalism and strengthen identification from the public to undertake social functions transferred from the government. The growth and expansion of social organizations needs greater financial support from the government and gradual removal of historical barriers unfit for their development, and social organizations should welcome supervision from the society voluntarily, and better play their roles in the modernization of social governance. Innovation ideas are required for the policy guidance and support for NGO, including active research, solution and prevention of various social issues for the sake of harmonious progress. Besides, the paper also explores the interactive mechanism of social organizations, community construction and grass-root governance, analyzing the social status of non-profit organizations and social enterprises, the function of social work and volunteer service. In the end, it investigates the paths for community construction and its relations with grass-root social governance from the perspective of cultivation of social organizations.

Key words: Nongovernmental Organization (NGO), social organization cultivation, community building, grassroots social governance, general public policy (GPP)

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 陈社英.NGO与政策研究中的创新思维[J]. 今日南国(理论创新版), 2009(1):1-5.
[2] UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL. Consultative relationship between the United Nations and non-governmental organizations[M]. Geneva:Resolution 1996/31, 49th plenary meeting, 1996.
[3] 苗艳丽.冷战后国际非政府组织崛起的原因[J]. 长治学院学报, 2005(4):3-5.
[4] 文军.非营利组织与中国社会发展[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社, 2004:8-10.
[5] YOUNG NICK, WOO ANTHOY. An introduction to the non-profit sector in China[M]. Kent, UK:Charities Aid Foundation, 2000:1-2.
[6] 民政部. 2016年社会服务发展统计公报[EB/OL].[2017-08-03]. http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/sj/tjgb/201708/20170800005382.shtml.
[7] 陈社英.总体公共政策与发展战略:国际视野下中国案例透视[J]. 改革与战略, 2008(6):1-9.
[8] 陈社英.经济增长与政策转型——论新时期发展方向及社会科学研究[J]. 改革与战略, 2009(12):1-5.
[9] 陈社英.社会问题与后经济国家:中国特色总体公共政策的挑战和机遇[J]. 梁小楠, 译.改革与战略, 2013(7):1-6, 10.
[10] 吴新叶.执政党与非政府组织:理论的超越与现实的路径——以超越"国家-社会"范式的视角[J]. 学术论坛, 2006, (12):50-54.
[11] 卡琳·埃格斯坦, 常竹亭. 冲突预防与非政府组织的作用[J]. 外交评论, 2006(5):46-55.
[12] 何平立.美国非政府组织的社会政治作用——兼析美国非政府组织对中美关系的影响[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2006(12):74-77.
[13] 康晓光.权力的转移[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社, 1999:30-34.
[14] 李斌.政治发展的社会新动力:试论中国民间组织兴起的政治发展意义[J]. 理论与改革, 2005(2):19-21.
[15] 陈洪涛, 王名. 社会组织在建设城市社区服务体系中的作用——基于居民参与型社区社会组织的视角[J]. 行政论坛, 2009(1):67-70.
[16] 刘华安.民间组织的崛起与执政党的政治整合[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004 (4):24-27.
[17] 郁建兴, 金蕾.社区社会组织在社会管理中的协同作用——以杭州市为例[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2012(4):157-168.
[18] 张云熙.社区社会组织研究综述[J]. 社科纵横, 2015(4):95-98.
[19] 张宁.发展社区社会组织的意义、障碍和改革措施[J]. 南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报, 2014 (5):92-94.
[20] 罗峰.转型期中国的政党治理:生成、资源与框架[J]. 毛泽东邓小平理论研究, 2014(5):66-74.
[21] 孟超.从"基层组织主导"到"社会组织参与"——中国城市社区建设模式的一种可能转变[J]. 学习探索, 2014(12):31-36.
[22] 谭日辉.社会组织创新研究述评[J]. 城市观察, 2012:157-164.
[23] 陈友华, 祝西冰.中国的社会组织培育:必然、应然与实然[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2014(3):90-95.
[24] 谢志强, 周平.社区建设中的社会组织作用研究——以上海为例[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2017 (3):126-132.
[1] FANG Yaming, ZHOU Wenyi, HUANG Jianxu. Insertion of Social Work Forces into the Construction of Rural Communities [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 80-88,98.
[2] CHEN Beili, WU Jiajun, XU Xuanguo. The Possibility and Path of Localized Paradigm for Community Building: An Empirical Study of “Wood & Brick Bank” of Tang Village in Zhejiang Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(3): 75-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!