SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 23-34.

• SHEHUI GONGZUO • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing

ZHAO Di1,2, ZHANG Zhipeng1,2, ZHANG Wei1,2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing,Jiangsu, 211167,China;
    2. Institute of Social Governance, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing,Jiangsu, 211167,China
  • Received:2021-09-22 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-06-06

Abstract: As a new profession, fast-developing social work plays an increasingly important role in social governance. However, neither social status identification of social workers nor stability of social work talents team sees optimistic. Based on professionalism, this article investigates the subjective social status identification of 84 social workers in Nanjing to discuss how the identification of the new professional group is influenced by professionalism. It can be found that professionalism in three dimensions is weak in practice, including professional cultural signals, professional knowledge system and professional access threshold of social work and social workers. Besides, the professional status of social work affects practitioners’ senses of professional value, achievement and social recognition, thus influencing their identification. In essence, social workers’ subjective social status identification is the embodiment of industrial and individual professionalism. Compared with traditional social and economic resource determinism, the professional logic mechanism of their identification highlights the social and cultural connotation of professionalism as a characteristic and relationship. To make the best of social work talents in social governance, the professionalism of social work needs strengthening by integrating professional cultural symbols, constructing a professional knowledge system and setting a strict professional threshold. Therefore, the social status recognition and stability of social workers can be improved.

Key words: social work, subjective social status identification, professionalism, social recognition, self-actualization

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] JACKMAN M R, JACKMAN R W. An interpretation of the relation between objective and subjective social status[J]. American sociological review, 1973, 38(5): 569-582
[2] JIANG H Y, WANG Y, CHUI E, et al. Professional identity and turnover intentions of social workers in Beijing, China: the roles of job satisfaction and agency type[J]. International social work, 2019, 62(1): 146-160
[3] OPERARIO D, ADLER N E, WILLIAMS D R. Subjective social status: reliability and predictive utility for global health[J]. Psychology & health, 2004, 19(2): 237-246
[4] CUNDIFF J M, MATTHEWS K A. Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? a meta-analysis[J]. Health psychology, 2017, 36(12): 1109-1125
[5] TAN J, KRAUS M W, CARPENTER N C, et al. The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic standing and subjective well-being: a meta-analytic review[J]. Psychological bulletin, 2020, 146(11): 970-1020
[6] 李正东. 社会工作从业人员职业认同及其影响因素研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(2): 66-76
[7] 罗兴奇, 宋言奇. 社会工作职业制度体系的本土构建——基于社会治理的视角[J]. 内蒙古社会科学(汉文版), 2015(5): 185-190
[8] 安秋玲. 社会工作者职业认同的影响因素[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(2): 39-47
[9] GRUENEWALD T L, KEMENY M E, AZIZ N. Subjective social status moderates cortisol responses to social threat[J]. Brain behavior & immunity, 2006, 20(4): 410-419
[10] ZOU H, XIONG Q, XU H. Does subjective social status predict self-rated health in Chinese adults and why?[J]. Social indicators research, 2020, 152(5): 443-471
[11] 黄超. 收入、资产与当代城乡居民的地位认同[J]. 社会学研究, 2020(2): 195-218, 245-246
[12] 李飞. 客观分层与主观建构: 城镇居民阶层认同的影响因素分析——对既往相关研究的梳理与验证[J]. 青年研究, 2013(4): 69-83, 95-96
[13] 张海东, 杨城晨. 住房与城市居民的阶层认同——基于北京、上海、广州的研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2017(5): 39-63, 243
[14] CHEN Y, WILLIAMS M. Subjective social status in transitioning china: trends and determinants[J]. Social science quarterly, 2018, 99(1): 406-422
[15] 边燕杰. 市场转型与社会分层——美国社会学者分析中国[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2002: 258.
[16] 高勇. 地位层级认同为何下移 兼论地位层级认同基础的转变[J]. 社会, 2013(4): 83-102
[17] 肖日葵, 仇立平. “文化资本”与阶层认同[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2016(6): 59-64, 127
[18] 陈云松, 范晓光. 阶层自我定位、收入不平等和主观流动感知(2003—2013)[J]. 中国社会科学, 2016(12): 109-126, 206-207
[19] 刘欣. 相对剥夺地位与阶层认知[J]. 社会学研究, 2002(1): 81-90
[20] 赵迪. 社会工作者主观社会地位认同的影响因素[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(3): 30-45
[21] GEOFFRION S, MORSELLI C, GUAY S. Rethinking compassion fatigue through the lens of professional identity: the case of child-protection workers.[J]. Trauma, violence, & abuse, 2016, 17(3): 270-83
[22] 王文彬, 余富强. 社会建构理论视角下的社会工作者身份认同研究——以深圳市社会工作者为例[J]. 社会工作, 2014(6): 57-66, 153
[23] 杨发祥, 叶淑静. 结构性约束与主体性建构: 社会工作者的职业认同[J]. 江海学刊, 2016(6): 101-109, 238
[24] 张和荣, 郭占锋. 当前中国社会工作者为何处于“弱势地位”——基于需求层次理论的视角[J]. 社会建设, 2015(5): 35-45
[25] 范慧, 范和生. 破解认同困境: 社会工作职业化的演进与路径拓展[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2018(5): 126-132
[26] 王思斌. 体制转变中社会工作的职业化进程[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(1): 1-5, 12
[27] 史柏年. 体制因素与专业认同——兼谈社会工作职业化策略[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(4): 6-11
[28] 孙立亚. 社会工作教育[C]//王思斌. 社会工作概论(第三版). 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014: 383-399.
[29] 何国良. 社会工作的本质: 论述分析的启示[C]//何国良, 王思斌. 华人社会社会工作本质的初探. 香港: 八方文化企业公司, 2000: 159-170.
[30] 文军, 吕洁琼. 社会工作专业化: 何以可能, 何以可为?[J]. 河北学刊, 2018(4): 156-163, 174
[31] ASHFORTH B E, MAEL F. Social identity theory and the organization[J]. Academy of management review, 1989, 14(1): 20-39
[32] 刘振, 徐永祥. 专业性与社会性的互构: 里士满社会工作的历史命题及其当代意义[J]. 学海, 2019(4): 49-54
[33] RAVULO J. Social work as a recognized profession in the Pacific region[J]. International social work, 2019, 62(2): 712-725
[34] 易松国. 社会工作认同: 一个专业教育需要正视的问题[J]. 学海, 2019(1): 116-123
[35] MASLOW A H. A theory of human motivation[J]. Psychological review, 1943, 50(1): 370-396
[36] 马克斯·韦伯. 经济与社会(第一卷)[M]. 阎克文, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2010: 420-425.
[37] 王思斌. 走向承认: 中国专业社会工作的发展方向[J]. 河北学刊, 2013(6): 108-113
[38] 阿克塞尔·霍耐特. 为承认而斗争[M]. 胡继华, 译. 上海: 上海世纪出版集团, 2005: 106-108.
[39] 徐道稳. 社会工作者职业认同和离职倾向研究——基于对深圳市社会工作者的调查[J]. 人文杂志, 2017(6): 111-118
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[11] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[12] YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[13] HE Xuesong, WANG Tianqi. 2021 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
[14] HE Jian, LAN Caiguang. Help Others by Mutual Assistance VS. Help Others to Self-Reliance: A New Interpretation of the Localization of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 16-24.
[15] LI Xuebin. “Whole Process & Broader Range” Clinical Practice: The Integrated Practice Model of Social Work in the Field of Social Assistance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 25-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!