SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 22-30.

• SHEHUI GONGZUO • Previous Articles    

Analysis and Reflection on Ethical Dilemmas in Anti-Drug Social Work Practice: Re-Understanding Based on Ethical Absolutism and Ethical Relativism

DENG Shilun   

  1. School of Public Administration, Guangdong Police College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
  • Received:2023-11-08 Published:2024-09-09

Abstract: Anti-drug social work is a key component of anti-drug public services and an important practical field of social work. Social workers often encounter value conflicts and ethical dilemmas when providing services for community drug rehabilitation people. In fact, at the philosophical level, it is an epistemological conflict between ethical absolutism and ethical relativism. The ethical challenges in current anti-drug social work come from five aspects: multiple roles, self-determination of the client, professional relationships, privacy and confidentiality, and occupational risks. The strategies to address ethical dilemmas include clarifying ethical issues and distinguishing between “true” and “false” dilemmas, highlight professional roles and avoiding identity confusion, following legal requirements and balancing relative self-determination, establishing clear boundaries and striving for minimal harm, enhancing ethical sensitivity and attaching importance to risk prevention. Anti-drug social workers should strengthen professional ethics, engage in reflective practices, and better integrate core values of social work with anti-drug practices to address ethical challenges in anti-drug social work.

Key words: anti-drug social work, ethical dilemma, ethical absolutism, ethical relativism

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 李汝吉. 禁毒社会工作服务的项目制运作研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020: 1.
[2] 《关于加强社会工作专业人才队伍建设的意见》发布[EB/OL]. (2011-11-08). https://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2011-11/08/content_1988417.htm.
[3] 国务院办公厅关于政府向社会力量购买服务的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2013-09-30). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2013-09/30/content_4032.htm.
[4] 中共中央、国务院印发《关于加强禁毒工作的意见》[EB/OL]. [2024-05-06]. https://m.mps.gov.cn/n6935718/n6936559/c4922441/content.html.
[5] 黄嘉鹏. 行政性与专业性的双向嵌入: 广州市禁毒社会工作的功能实现机制研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2021: 2.
[6] 卿章艳, 石圆圆. 禁毒社工服务专业关系建立的误区和应对[J]. 中国社会工作, 2022(6): 41-42
[7] 王曙文. 禁毒社会工作的伦理困境及应对策略[J]. 云南警官学院学报, 2021(4): 26-29
[8] 骆雅丽, 吴金凤. 禁毒社会工作实务中的伦理困境探析[J]. 法制与社会, 2021(20): 107-109
[9] 谷琦. 禁毒社会工作者实务中伦理困境探析[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳师范大学, 2023: 10-22.
[10] 王单. 戒毒社会工作实务中的伦理困境及应对研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2019: 20-31
[11] 理查德丁·伯恩斯坦. 超越客观主义与相对主义[M]. 郭小平, 康兴平, 赵仁方, 等, 译. 北京: 光明日报出版社, 1992: 9.
[12] 聂文军. 论伦理相对主义与伦理绝对主义[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2012(5): 16-20
[13] 拉尔夫·多戈夫, 弗兰克·M.洛温伯格, 唐纳·哈林顿. 社会工作伦理: 实务工作指南[M]. 隋玉杰, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005: 39-65.
[14] 吴金凤. 禁毒社会工作中信任关系建立的实务研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2021: 51.
[15] 易俊彪. 禁毒社工职业化发展困境与优化策略研究[D]. 南昌: 江西师范大学, 2021: 28.
[16] 赵芳. 社会工作伦理: 理论与实务[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2016: 176.
[17] 高鉴国. 社会工作价值与伦理[M] . 济南: 山东人民出版社, 2015: 36-40.
[18] 赵芳. 社会工作专业伦理中双重关系的限制、困境及其选择——一项基于城乡社会工作者的实证研究[M]//王思斌. 中国社会工作研究(第1辑). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2013: 51-72
[19] 赖育珍. 戒毒康复人员常见风险类型及管理策略[J]. 中国社会工作, 2022(25): 45-46
[20] 戴维·A.哈德凯瑟, 帕翠霞·R.鲍沃斯, 斯坦利·温内科. 社区工作理论与实务[M]. 2版. 夏建中, 等, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008: 26-27.
[21] HOUSTON S, SPRATT T, DEVANEY J. Mandated prevention in child welfare: considerations from a framework shaping ethical inquiry[J]. Journal of social work, 2011, 11(3): 287-305
[22] 刘江, 顾东辉. “约束—内化”vs. 反思性实践认知——社会工作伦理守则与留职意愿关系研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2022(2): 183-201, 230
[23] 高艺多, 文军. 现代主义还是后现代主义?——社会工作理论取向的比较与反思[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2020(3): 102-109
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!