SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 55-63.

• SHEHUI GONGZUO • Previous Articles    

Companionship, Linkage, and Inverted Sense of Practice: The Role Shaping Process of Social Workers in Environmental Governance

TANG Haoran1, LUO Qiao2   

  1. 1. School of Sociology, Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China;
    2. College of Public Management, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China
  • Received:2023-11-05 Published:2024-09-09

Abstract: Environmental governance refers to a practical way to promote the modernization of the harmonious coexistence between humans and nature. Collaborative governance among multiple social subjects is a prerequisite for the formation of an environmental governance community. Social workers, as important participants in environmental governance, can fulfill a unique role through the process of role shaping at three levels. First, on an action level, they can as companions in environmental practice to promote the development of action roles. Second, on a relationship level, they can establish resource linkages by promoting the integration role in trainings. Third, on a structural level, they can achieve the transformation of structural role through a new professional approach of social work-policy practice. Furthermore, with the help of the “three-level” role-shaping framework, this article attempts to provide different ideas for the exploration of the theory and practice of environmental social work in the local context.

Key words: environmental governance, social workers, role shaping, environmental social work

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 洪大用. 环境社会学[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021: 257-272.
[2] 陈涛. 环境治理的社会学研究: 进程、议题与前瞻[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(1): 53-62, 107
[3] 陈阿江, 陈涛. 环境社会学研究综述[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2019: 291-306.
[4] 乌尔里希·贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2004: 119-121.
[5] 洪大用. 关于环境社会治理的若干思考[J]. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(1): 78-84
[6] 童敏. 社会工作理论: 历史环境下社会服务实践者的声音和智慧[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019: 11-13.
[7] 王思斌. 中国式现代化新进程与社会工作的新本土化[J]. 社会工作, 2023(1): 1-9,103
[8] 罗桥. 生态共情与生态赋能: 环境社会工作者的感性积累与理性反思[J]. 学习与探索, 2023(6): 38-46
[9] 钟兴菊, 胡丹. 环境友好行为可持续实践的过程与机制研究——基于青年环保人的案例分析[J]. 中国青年社会科学, 2022(3): 92-101
[10] 卢春天, 卫子昊. 我国青年环境关心的变迁演替——基于CGSS2003—2021的数据分析[J]. 中国青年研究, 2023(6): 15-23
[11] GAMBRILL E. Social work practice: a critical thinker’s guide[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997: 213-221.
[12] 罗桥. 环境社会工作: 概念、价值观与实践路径[J]. 学习与探索, 2020(2): 43-51,199
[13] SPECHT H, COURTNEY M. Unfaithful angels: how social work has abandoned its mission[M]. New York: Free Press, 1994: 87-88.
[14] 阿尔弗雷德·舒茨. 社会世界的意义构成[M]. 游宗祺, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012: 67-210.
[15] 罗桥, 汤皓然. 社会工作介入环境治理的理论基础与路径选择[J]. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(1): 97-106
[16] 罗桥. 环境社会工作研究: 范式转换、多元呈现及实践取向[J]. 社会建设, 2022(4): 72-84,96
[17] ANDROFF D, FIKE C, RORKE J. Greening social work education: teaching environmental rights and sustainability in community practice[J]. Journal of social work education, 2017, 53(3): 399-413
[18] 艾拉-琳娜·马蒂斯, 等. 生态社会工作与社会工作实践[M]. 迟红, 等, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019: 12-15.
[19] 罗桥, 汤皓然. 价值重构、场景塑造与行动赋权: 社会工作参与社区环境治理共同体构建的三个基础[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022(5): 5-14
[20] 梁彦隆. 主体间性与环境问题——兼谈生态伦理与可持续发展[J]. 科学技术与辩证法, 2004(2): 1-4,12
[21] 汤皓然, 罗桥. 社会工作者参与环境治理的实践路径[J]. 中国社会工作, 2023(28): 30-31
[22] 洪大用. 经济增长、环境保护与生态现代化——以环境社会学为视角[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(9): 82-99,207
[23] JORGENSON A K, DIETZ T. Economic growth does not reduce the ecological intensity of human well-being[J]. Sustainability science, 2015, 10(1): 149-156
[24] YOUNG O R. On environmental Governance: sustainability, efficiency, and equity[M]. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2013: 127-131.
[25] 何雪松. 社会工作理论[M]. 上海: 格致出版社, 2017: 90-92.
[26] 米歇尔·福柯. 规训与惩罚[M]. 刘北成, 杨远婴, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2007.
[27] CATTON W R J, DUNLAP R E. Environmental sociology: a new paradigm[J]. The American sociologist, 1978, 13(1): 41-49
[28] 盖奥尔格·西美尔. 社会学: 关于社会化形式的研究[M]. 林荣远, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2002: 124-125.
[29] 埃米尔·涂尔干. 社会分工论[M]. 渠敬东, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2013: 223.
[30] 皮埃尔·布迪厄. 实践感[M]. 蒋梓骅, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2012: 73-81.
[31] DEWANE C J. Environmentalism and social work: the ultimate social justice issue[J]. Social work today, 2011, 11(5): 20
[32] 杨善华, 谢立中. 西方社会学理论·下卷[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006: 93-100.
[33] 肖瑛. 从“国家与社会”到“制度与生活”: 中国社会变迁研究的视角转换[J]. 中国社会科学, 2014(9): 88-104, 204-205
[34] BESTHORN F H. Vertical farming: social work and sustainable urban agriculture in an age of global food crises[J]. Australian social work, 2013, 66(2): 187-203
[35] 李荣山. 权力与伦理: 韦伯支配社会学中的国家理由问题[J]. 社会, 2020(3): 1-31
[36] 马凤芝. 政策实践: 一种新兴的社会工作实践方法[J]. 东岳论丛, 2014(1): 12-17
[1] TANG Yong, YAN Ying. Work Role, Professional Identity and Work Emotion of Civil Affairs Social Workers: An Analysis Based on the Data of the China Social Work Longitudinal Study in 2019 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 1-11.
[2] GAO Haihong, LIN Yili. Research on Social Workers’ Turnover Intention from the Perspective of Emotional Labor: An Analysis Based on CSWLS 2019 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(3): 29-39.
[3] HUANG Guoying, YE Fuyi, WU Jiaheng. Job Autonomy and Job Support of the Medical System: The Influence Factors of the Medical Social Workers’ Retention Intention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(2): 52-59.
[4] LIU Yanxia, ZHA Yuan. Practical Dilemmas and Breakthrough Strategies of School Social Work in the Less Developed Western Region [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 53-60.
[5] MENG Yi, HU Yang, MA Huanhuan. A Systematic Evaluation of the Factors Influencing Occupational Burnout of Social Workers [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(6): 34-45.
[6] XU Haoyang, ZHANG Yonghong. The Influence of Self-Compassion on Compassion Fatigue among Front-Line Social Workers: The Mediation Effect of Career Self-Efficacy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(4): 44-52.
[7] HUANG Dan, LUO Yingting, LIN Wenyi. Development and Validation of Medical Social Workers’ Professional Competence Scale [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(3): 15-22.
[8] TANG Yong, NI Xiaoqi. The Influence of Professional Identity and Social Support on Job Satisfaction of Social Workers: The Mediation Effect of Role Clarity [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(1): 53-61.
[9] LUO Qiao, TANG Haoran. Value Reconstruction, Scene Shaping and Action Empowerment: Three Foundations for Social Work to Participate in the Community Construction of Community Environmental [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 5-14.
[10] CHENG Pengli. Research on the Construction of Environmental Social Work Method System with Advocacy as the Core [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 29-35.
[11] FENG Boya. Research on Social Workers’ Environmental Consciousness from the Perspective of Green Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 36-46.
[12] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[13] CHENG Shiting, ZHANG Wei, XIE Shiyu. Retention of Front-Line Social Workers: Utility Analysis of the Mediation of Family Support [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 52-60.
[14] YU Tieshan. Pendulum Development: The Number of Community Full-Time Social Workers and Its Influencing Factors: An Empirical Study Based on CLDS2014 and CLDS2016 Data [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 63-70,79.
[15] ZHOU Yongkang, CHEN Shuang. A Study of Local Social Workers’ Relationship with Colleagues Under the Background of Chinese Culture [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(1): 54-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!