SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 61-68.

Previous Articles    

“Governance-Enhancement” and “Empowerment-Governance”: The Bidirectional Interaction and Practical Pathways of Governance and Empowerment: Based on the Case of Social Work Interventions for Left-Behind Women

WANG Jie, LIN Chen   

  1. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China
  • Received:2025-04-16 Published:2026-01-15

Abstract: Effective rural governance necessitates the active participation of various stakeholders. While left-behind women possess the potential for such participation, their capabilities remain insufficient. This paper proposes the concepts of “governance-empowerment” and “empowerment-governance” to illustrate the reciprocal relationship between “governance” and “empowerment” in rural governance, wherein both serve as objectives and methods of realization. Integrating the scenario-based, interpersonal, and process-oriented aspects of governance and empowerment, we propose an analytical framework for “governance-empowerment” and “empowerment-governance”. Based on the case study of Village L in Fujian Province, this paper illustrates the intervention pathways of social work: in terms of scenarios, governance should enter the daily life scenarios and achieve empowerment through participation for left-behind women; in terms of interpersonal relationships, governance may achieve group empowerment through organization. Additionally, in terms of process, governance should be carried out step by step to achieve hierarchical governance and gradual capacity enhancement. “Governance-empowerment” and “empowerment-governance” provide a theoretical framework and practical guidance for rural social work.

Key words: governance-enhancement, empowerment-governance, left-behind women, social work

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 易艳阳. 乡土嵌合: 农村社会工作的实践面向与行动路径[J]. 理论月刊, 2024(8): 130-138.
[2] 胡鹏辉, 任敏, 严艺文. 重建熟悉关系: “五社联动”中专业社工参与乡村治理何以可为——基于Q县H村项目实践案例的探究[J]. 学习与实践, 2023(5): 112-120.
[3] 张庆贺, 田先红. 乡村振兴背景下留守妇女参与乡村治理的机制研究——基于赣南的实践经验[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(2): 77-88.
[4] 席婷婷. 农村空心化现象: 一个文献综述[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2016(10): 75-80.
[5] 潘璐, 刘成曦. 乡村自治中的女性领导力及其治理优势[J]. 社会建设, 2021(03): 26-34.
[6] 詹姆斯· N. 罗西瑙. 没有政府的治理[M]. 张胜军, 刘小林, 等, 译. 南昌: 江西人民出版社, 2001: 5.
[7] 俞可平. 治理和善治引论[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 1999(5): 37-41.
[8] 田凯, 黄金. 国外治理理论研究: 进程与争鸣[J]. 政治学研究, 2015(6): 47-58.
[9] 吴惠芳, 饶静. 农村留守妇女研究综述[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2009(2): 18-23.
[10] 王印红, 李莉. 女性何以增进社区治理效能?——基于Q市三个社区的案例研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021(6): 66-84.
[11] 汪淳玉, 吴惠芳. 乡村振兴视野下的困境留守妇女[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(4): 93-100.
[12] 王晓莉, 高端阳. 妇女组织参与社会治理的思想演进与核心问题[J]. 科学社会主义, 2023(4): 88-95.
[13] 侯秋宇, 唐有财. 社会性别视角下的城市社区治理——基于上海市徐汇区社区社会组织“绿主妇”的个案研究[J]. 中华女子学院学报, 2017(4): 48-55.
[14] 金一虹. 流动的父权: 流动农民家庭的变迁[J]. 中国社会科学, 2010(4): 151-165.
[15] 彭善民, 陈晓丽, 张易为. 社会治理视域下的基层妇女议事会运作[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2023(4): 44-57.
[16] SOLOMAN B B. Black empowerment: social work in oppressed communities[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976: 1-38.
[17] MUCHTAR A T, OVERTON J, PALOMINO-SCHALSCHA M. Contextualizing empowerment: highlighting key elements from women’s stories of empowerment[J]. Development in practice, 2019, 29(8): 1053-1063.
[18] 陈树强. 增权: 社会工作理论与实践的新视角[J]. 社会学研究, 2003(5): 70-83.
[19] PEASE B. Rethinking empowerment: a postmodern reappraisal for emancipatory practice[J]. British journal of social work, 2002, 32(2): 135-147.
[20] 顾东辉. “治理型增能”: 治理理念在流动人口增能中的应用[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2015(3): 11-15.
[21] 郑蓉, 高艺多. “参与式增能”: 乡镇社会工作站功能与实践路径[J]. 北京社会科学, 2023(3): 119-128.
[22] ADAMS R. Self-help, social work and empowerment[M]. London: Macmillan, 1990: 43.
[23] 曹海晶, 杜娟. 环境正义视角下的农村垃圾治理[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(1): 111-117.
[24] 张国磊, 李尧磊. 第一书记嵌入农村基层治理的结构性困境与优化路径——基于桂南B镇的调研分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(10): 74-81.
[25] 陈涛, 胡沙, 杨欣然. 农村社会工作服务机构在乡村治理中的协同作用——基于Y农村社工事务所在Z村的经验分析[J]. 学习与实践, 2020(1): 108-114.
[26] 童敏, 周晓彤. 基层治理与自我增能: 中国特色社会工作道路的理论审视[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(5): 1-12.
[27] 罗强强, 岩温罕. 场景化治理: 多中心工作中的基层行动策略与实践逻辑[J]. 社会发展研究, 2023(3): 210-221.
[28] 童敏. 场景实践——中国特色社会工作理论体系的建构[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2023: 227.
[29] 陈剩勇, 徐珣. 参与式治理: 社会管理创新的一种可行性路径——基于杭州社区管理与服务创新经验的研究[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2013(2): 62-72.
[30] 格里·斯托克, 华夏风. 作为理论的治理: 五个论点[J]. 国际社会科学杂志(中文版), 1999(1): 19-30.
[31] 王杰, 洪佩, 朱志伟. 乡村振兴的空间之维——基于福建土楼修缮的案例[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(4): 146-154.
[32] ROSE S M. Advocacy/empowerment: an approach to clinical practice for social work[J]. Journal of sociology and social welfare, 1990, 17(2): 41-52.
[33] 全球治理委员会. 我们的全球伙伴关系[M]. 牛津: 牛津大学出版社, 1995: 23.
[34] 童敏. 社会工作理论 历史环境下社会服务实践者的声音和智慧[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019: 471.
[35] KAM P K. Strengthening the empowerment approach in social work practice: an EPS model[J]. Journal of social work, 2020, 21(3): 329-352.
[1] QIU Guoliang, FENG Shujuan, LAI Xinyan. From Embedded to Incorporated: The Logic of Transform and Implications for Governance of Social Work in Social Assistance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2026, 26(1): 1-10.
[2] YIN Muzi, LIU Qiqi. Research on the Generation Mechanism of Practical Knowledge in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2026, 26(1): 11-20,41.
[3] WU Ziming. Rethinking the Discovery and Use of Historical Materials on Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2026, 26(1): 32-41.
[4] LI Na. The Transformation and Development of Social Work in the Process of Chinese-Style Modernization: Driven by National Development Strategy Goals [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(6): 10-20.
[5] LI Zhengdong, WANG Jin. A Study on the Impact of Challenging and Obstructive Stressors on the Turnover Intention of Social Workers: Workplace Anxiety and the Role of Future Job Self-Clarity [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(6): 21-31.
[6] SHI Tianqi, DAI Yi. Professional Dilemmas and Coping Strategies of Community Workers from the Perspective of Dual Institutional Logic [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(6): 32-41.
[7] FAN Huifang, ZHAI Yue. Analyzing the Discourse of Judicial Social Workers in the Rehabilitation of Juvenile Offenders [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(6): 73-82,112.
[8] CHEN Sheng, SONG Yue. Quality Evaluation and Optimization of Social Work Talent Development Policies: A PMC Index Model Analysis Based on 12 Policy Samples [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(6): 100-112.
[9] TAN Lei, LIAO Ying. The Development Trajectory and Logical Evolution of Professional Service for Social Work Stations in Towns (Sub-Districts): A Case Study of City G [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 23-31,43.
[10] CHEN Chaolian, HE Hu. The Application and Thinking of CIPP Model in the Evaluation of Social Work Service Project: Take the H Institution Rural Preschool Child Care Project as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 52-64,110.
[11] BAI Yue. Optimization Path Analysis on Collaborative Governance Under the Mechanism of the “Linkage of Five Elements in the Community” [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 74-84,96.
[12] ZHANG Zhaoguo, LU Chunyan. Pathways for New Quality Productivity to Empower High-Quality Development of Service Efficiency in Social Work Stations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 8-15.
[13] HUANG Haiping. Professional Locking and Response Strategies in Social Work Practice Under the Background of Rural Revitalization: Taking the Township Social Work Stations in C and S Towns of Y City, Guangdong Province as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 16-25.
[14] YANG Weiwei, GUO Qiusheng. Context Construction and Localization Adjustment of School Social Work: Based on the Investigation and Research of Puyang Experimental Primary School [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 38-46.
[15] JIA Bo, HASI Eerdun, WANG Qinggeletu. A Study on the Professional Competence of Medical Social Workers and Their Influencing Factors in Inner Mongolia: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Data of Inner Mongolia Medical Social Worker Dynamics Survey in 2023 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 47-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!