SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 1-8.

    Next Articles

Positive Internality and Negative Externality of Social Work Projects: The Ecological Dilemma of Professional Services and Pathways to Resolution

REN Wenqi1, GU Donghui2   

  1. 1. College for Public wellbeing, Shanghai Open University, Shanghai, 200292, China;
    2. College of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200234, China
  • Received:2025-07-16 Online:2026-05-15 Published:2026-05-15

Abstract: In the process of advancing social work services through project-based mechanisms, structural contradictions have gradually emerged during the incremental reform of professional development. These contradictions are primarily reflected in the positive internalities and negative externalities of project outcomes. Specifically, professional evaluations demonstrate the positive internalities of an organization’s project professionalism, while the projects simultaneously generate negative externalities that harm the service ecosystem. This structural contradiction stems from the inherent conflict between bureaucratic intervention and professional autonomy, and is expressed through the frictions between “indicator optimization” and “value deviation.” Addressing this dilemma necessitates a professional reconstruction of the service ecosystem. This includes establishing a client-centered evaluation system, aligning project planning with service principles, constructing dual institutional and financial support mechanisms, and fostering a collaborative multi-stakeholder service system.

Key words: social work projects, internality, externality, professional evaluation, service ecosystem

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 马卫山. 社会工作服务项目中的目标置换现象研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2023: 1-20.
[2] 孙斐, 黄锐. 迈向项目式个案管理: 事实无人抚养儿童社会工作服务的困境及其转型[J]. 社会建设, 2022(6): 69-79
[3] 刘雨航. 社会工作项目制的效果偏差为何发生?基于制度不确定性视角的解读[J]. 社会建设, 2023(4): 15-30,46
[4] 刘江, 顾东辉, 肖梦希. 满意度能作为社会服务效果评价指标吗?——基于一项政府购买社会服务项目的量化分析[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(1): 1-14
[5] 徐道稳. 从“去体制化”到“新体制化”: 社会工作的体制嬗变[J]. 社会科学战线, 2023(4): 230-239
[6] THALER R H, SUNSTEIN C R. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008: 175.
[7] PIGOU A C. The economics of welfare[M]. London: Macmillan, 1932: 207-208.
[8] 刘江. 自由目标评估: 一种可行的社会服务项目效果评估法 ——兼论社会服务项目效果评估的新转向[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(4): 57-64
[9] 焦若水, 高怀阳. 镶套、内卷与自证: 社会工作者书写的三重动力机制[J]. 社会建设, 2023(3): 51-67
[10] 吴帆, 晏浩. 随机对照试验受限下社会工作干预策略选择——以一个增进儿童积极行为发展的项目为例[J]. 中国社会科学评价, 2023(2): 141-156,160
[11] 周学斌. 社工的视角: “三社联动”项目下的第三方评估反思[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2022: 1-20.
[12] 徐华, 周晶晶. 影响政府购买社会工作服务项目第三方 评估的主体因素分析——以H 社工机构为例[J]. 常熟理工学院学报(哲学社会科学), 2023(3): 86-94
[13] 汪容华. 政府购买社会工作服务项目评估效果及优化路径——以深圳Y 区为例[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2023: 1-20.
[14] 韩江风. 技术赋权评估: 社工站服务第三方评估平台探寻[J]. 中国社会工作, 2023(9): 31-33
[15] 雷杰, 张瀚予, 丁锋辉. 社会工作介入未成年人监护体系建设的“最佳实践”——以广东省未成年人救助保护机构能力建设项目为例[J]. 社会建设, 2023(5): 59-82
[16] 徐逍. 社会工作服务项目评估的反思——基于CIPP评估模型[D]. 贵阳: 贵州民族大学, 2023: 1-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!