SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 66-72,102.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Legitimacy Generation as a Social Process: The Logic of Social Work Organizations Embedding Into Community Governance

DENG Zhiping, GUO Jiaqi   

  1. Guangdong Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510635, China
  • Received:2025-09-25 Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-07-15

Abstract: This paper takes the YC social work station in District B of City A as a case study to explore the legitimacy generation mechanism of social work organizations embedding into community governance. Based on Scott’s three-dimensional legitimacy theory and situated within the institutional context of grassroots governance in China, the research constructs a three-stage analytical framework of “institutional access-relational mobilization-service practice”. The study finds that legitimacy generation is not achieved instantaneously, but rather emerges as a dynamic social process encompassing institutional authorization, value negotiation, and cognitive internalization. In the dimension of regulatory legitimacy, social work organizations obtain formal qualifications to enter the community governance system through the government purchase of services. In the dimension of normative legitimacy, social work organizations gradually gain social recognition by relying on community relationship networks and negotiating shared values. In the dimension of cognitive legitimacy, the sustained delivery of professional services enables residents’ identification with, and acceptance of, the role and function of social workers in everyday life. The three-dimensional legitimacy presents a phased and progressive logic, advancing from external institutional pressure, to social recognition, and ultimately to cognitive internalization, thereby reflecting the sequential characteristics of legitimacy generation in grassroots governance. The study not only deepens the academic understanding of the embedding processes of social work organizations in the community governance, but also provides empirical implications for the modernization of grassroots governance.

Key words: social work organizations, community governance, legitimacy theory, social process

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 中央组织部, 中央政法委, 民政部, 等. 社会工作专业人才队伍建设中长期规划(2011—2020年)[EB/OL]. [2024-12-08]. https://www.mohrss.gov.cn/zyjsrygls/ZYJSRYGLSgongzuodongtai/201205/t20120531_82051.html.
[2] 黄晓星, 熊慧玲. 过渡治理情境下的中国社会服务困境 基于Z市社会工作服务的研究[J]. 社会, 2018(4): 133-159
[3] 李杏果. 社区社会组织参与社会治理共同体建设: 内在逻辑与实现路径[J]. 河南社会科学, 2023(1): 70-78
[4] 徐选国, 黄景莲. 从政社关系到党社关系: 社会工作介入社区治理的情景变迁与理论转向[J]. 社会科学, 2020(3): 68-85
[5] 朱健刚, 陈安娜. 嵌入中的专业社会工作与街区权力关系——对一个政府购买服务项目的个案分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(1): 43-64,242
[6] SCOTT W R. Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests, and identities[M]. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Press, 1995: 82-140.
[7] SUCHMAN M C. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches[J]. The academy of management review, 1995, 20(3): 571-610
[8] 陈扬, 许晓明, 谭凌波. 组织制度理论中的“合法性”研究述评[J]. 华东经济管理, 2012(10): 137-142
[9] 刘丽娟, 王恩见. 双重治理逻辑下政府购买社会工作服务项目的运作困境及对策[J]. 社会建设, 2021(3): 73-84
[10] 吉鹏. 购买服务背景下政府与社会组织的互动嵌入: 行为过程、负面效应及优化路径[J]. 求实, 2019(1): 74-83,111-112
[11] 陆杰华, 黄钰婷. 过渡性治理体制下社会工作嵌入社区的困境与应对策略——基于W市Z街道购买公共服务的质性研究[J]. 社会政策研究, 2022(4): 25-39
[12] 刘帅顺, 张汝立. 嵌入式治理: 社会组织参与社区治理的一个解释框架[J]. 理论月刊, 2020(5): 122-131
[13] 姜秀敏, 李月. “非正式权威”塑造: 社会组织嵌入社区治理的三重路径——对山东省Q市F组织开展社区服务的个案分析[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2022(2): 55-62
[14] 包国宪, 刘璎. 嵌入与融合: 社会工作者何以推动社区治理共同体建构——基于杭州市西湖区的实践[J]. 治理研究, 2025(2): 97-109,159-160
[15] 闫臻. 嵌入社区治理中的专业社会工作介入——以天津KC社区为例[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(1): 46-55,61
[16] 余雄笛. 本土化社会工作在社区文化治理中的角色研究——以武汉市L社工机构为例[D/OL]. [2025-03-26]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27157/d.cnki.ghzku.2022.004452.
[17] 彭惠青, 仝斌. 社会工作在基层治理专业化中的角色与功能[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(1): 46-50
[18] 徐东涛, 汪真诚. 常规扎根与动态回应: 外包式社工站参与基层治理的多重逻辑与运作机制[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2023(7): 69-80,158
[19] 王思斌. 社会治理共同体建设与社会工作的促进作用[J]. 社会工作, 2020(2): 3-9,108
[1] LIU Minghao, WANG Yingqi. From Idle Stock to Quality Increment: The Implementation Mechanism for Transforming Community Idle Assets Into Embedded Service Facilities [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2026, 26(4): 95-102.
[2] WANG Lu. A Study on the Patterns and Types of Resident Participation in Co-Production Within Micro-Infrastructure Development [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(6): 91-99.
[3] SHI Tianqi, DAI Yi. Professional Dilemmas and Coping Strategies of Community Workers from the Perspective of Dual Institutional Logic [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(6): 32-41.
[4] CHEN Jing, LUO Qin. Subjectivity Deficiency and Reconstruction of Social Work Agencies in Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 68-78,88.
[5] HOU Liwen, LI Huan. Ethical Practice of County-Level Social Work Organizations: A Case Study of Cang [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 35-43.
[6] ZHANG Yuguang, HAN Yaojun. The Exploration of Digital Technology Empowering Urban Community Intelligent Governance: Based on the Case Analysis of Jiunanhai County Community in Guangzhou [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 85-93.
[7] HU Xiaojun. Construction of the Practice Model and Development Support System for Community Philanthropy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 90-100.
[8] LI Xiao, WANG Wenjing, LIU Yueting, ZHENG Misi. Foundation-Practice-Principle: A Path of Competence Development for Community Workers in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(4): 53-64.
[9] LIN Chengyan, ZHUO Caiqin. Theoretical Options and Practice Integration of Social Work Participating in Community Governance: An Action Research of Community Service Based on Community Capacity Building Theory [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(6): 77-91.
[10] FANG Ying, HU Yonglin. Research on the Cooperation between Social Work Organizations and Enterprises from the Perspective of Open System [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(1): 5-14.
[11] YANG Hui, LI Li. Commercialization of Non-Profit Organizations: Research on the Development of Social Work Organizations to Social Enterprises [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(5): 14-24.
[12] TONG Min, ZHOU Xiaotong. Social Healing: A Hope-Implanted Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(5): 5-13.
[13] FANG Yaming, ZHOU Wenyi, HUANG Jianxu. Insertion of Social Work Forces into the Construction of Rural Communities [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 80-88,98.
[14] GUO Weihe. Study on the Relationship between State Governance and Community Governance and Modernization of Their Coordinated Evolution [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 5-15.
[15] TAN Xia, LIN Yigang. Research on the Path of International Community Governance from the Strength Perspective: Taking Chongqing Hongyan Community as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 68-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!