SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 22-31.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Service to Empower: A Practical Way of Embedding Social Work in “Village to Residence”Community Governance

FANG Yaming, ZHOU Wenyi   

  1. School of Politics and Law, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510520, China
  • Received:2020-05-07 Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-11-19

Abstract: The “village to residence”community is the product of the dual role of urbanization development and government policy, which has vigorously promoted the process of urbanization. However, due to the connection of system mechanism and public service, “village to residence” community also has problems such as lagging management concept and mode, insufficient financial and resource investment, and lack of public service supply. Due to the different social capital and actual conditions, the effective experience and methods of urban mature community governance are difficult to be simply copied into the “village to residence” community governance. So it is urgent to introduce new governance methods and social resources to boost the “village to residence” community to improve governance efficiency. In the process of promoting the community governance of “village to residence” community, we should give full play to the unique advantages of social work empowerment, integrate the resources inside and outside the community, promote the collaborative governance of multiple subjects, and promote the realization of urban and rural integrated development and social co-construction and sharing pattern.

Key words: social work, community of “village to residence”, empowerment, practice path, governance modernization

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 陈炜伟. 70年来我国城镇化率大幅提升[N]. 驻马店日报. 2019-08-16(04).
[2] 国家统计局. 人口总量平稳增长 人口素质显著提升——新中国成立70周年经济社会发展成就系列报告之二十[EB/OL]. (2019-08-22). http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201908/t20190822_1692898.html, 2019-08-22/2020-01-15.
[3] 漳州市区这42个村“撤村改居”, 赶紧瞧瞧是你家“升级”了吗[EB/OL]. [2020-06-14]. https://www.sohu.com/a/401376140_120054884.
[4] 习近平在上海考察[N]. 人民日报海外版. 2019-11-04(02).
[5] 中央政法委贯彻四中全会精神再出实招!推进市域社会治理现代化的重要部署来了[EB/OL]. [2020-6-14]. http://hlbe.eegns.nmgzf.gov.cn/cabb/2019-12-04/1580.html.
[6] 顾永红, 向德平, 胡振光. “村改居”社区: 治理困境、目标取向与对策[J]. 社会主义研究, 2014(3): 107-112
[7] 徐健, 姜微, 张红, 等. 2018年度中国社会工作发展报告发布[N]. 公益时报. 2019-03-26(007)
[8] 姚进忠. 赋权: “村改居”社区服务的路径选择[J]. 城市问题, 2011(10): 80-85
[9] 陈晓莉. 村改居社区及其问题: 对城中村城市化进程的反思与改革[J]. 兰州学刊, 2014(3): 126-132
[10] 周孟珂. 国家与社会互构: “村改居”政策“变通式落实”的实践逻辑——基于Z街道“村改居”的案例分析[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2016(5): 93-98
[11] 王春生. 珠江三角洲“村改居”进程中的公共管理组织体制分析[J]. 南方农村, 2008(2): 26-31
[12] 潘瑜, 李晗, 戴婧. 新型城镇化背景下“村改居”社区治理路径研究[J]. 新丝路(下旬), 2016(3): 82-83
[13] 巨东红, 杨贵华. 厦门市“村改居”社区社工人才队伍建设调查[J]. 集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011(2): 100-107+119
[14] 倪赤丹. 基层社区治理体系与治理能力现代化的路径选择[J]. 特区实践与理论, 2015(3): 105-109
[15] 李棉管. “村改居”: 制度变迁与路径依赖——广东省佛山市N区的个案研究[J]. 中国农村观察, 2014(1): 13-25
[16] 黄海平. 城镇化道路上的夹层: 城乡结合部“村改居”社区考察[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(6): 114-124
[17] 黄锐. 城市社区治理中的公共性构筑[J]. 人文杂志, 2015(4): 116-120
[18] 陈伟东, 吴岚波. 从嵌入到融入: 社区三社联动发展趋势研究[J]. 中州学刊, 2019(1): 74-80
[19] 朱健刚, 陈安娜. 嵌入中的专业社会工作与街区权力关系——对一个政府购买服务项目的个案分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(1): 43-64+242
[20] 李莉, 章君凤. 社区协同治理中的社会工作人才、机构与方法介入[J]. 学习与实践, 2012(10): 90-94
[21] 王思斌. 社会治理结构的进化与社会工作的服务型治理[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014(6): 30-37
[22] 王思斌. 社会工作参与社会治理的特点及其贡献——对服务型治理的再理解[J]. 社会治理, 2015(1): 49-57
[23] 吴海燕. 重构与治理 基于“多中心”的中国城市社区研究[M]. 北京: 中央文献出版社. 2006: 138.
[24] 陈伟东, 张继军. 社区治理社会化: 多元要素协同、共生[J]. 社会科学家, 2016(8): 38-43
[25] 燕继荣. 中国现代国家治理体系的构建[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2018: 252.
[26] 王力平. 社会工作与基层治理的协同发展[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2019(5): 171-178
[27] 龚维斌. 中国特色社会主义社会治理体制[M]. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 2016: 167-168.
[28] 王永华, 罗家为. 政府赋权与社工参与: 社区治理的路径选择——基于政社合作的分析视角[J]. 中共天津市委党校学报, 2018(2): 43-49
[29] 王力平. 社会工作协同城市民族事务治理: 逻辑生成与路径选择[J]. 青海社会科学, 2019(2): 115-121
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[11] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[12] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[13] YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[14] HE Xuesong, WANG Tianqi. 2021 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
[15] HE Jian, LAN Caiguang. Help Others by Mutual Assistance VS. Help Others to Self-Reliance: A New Interpretation of the Localization of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 16-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!