SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 69-77.

• SHEHUI GUANLI • Previous Articles     Next Articles

External and Internal Forces: Analysis of Access to Opportunities for Social Organizations to Participate in Social Governance

CHEN Jing1,2   

  1. 1. School of Sociology and Public Administration, Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China;
    2. School of Management, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000, China
  • Received:2021-01-28 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2022-01-18

Abstract: The article analyzes access to opportunities for social organizations to participate in social governance from the perspective of the institutional environment. Moreover, it attempts to conduct a dynamic analysis of the institutional environment, focusing on two main subjects involved in the institutional implementation:The government and social organizations, especially on the access to participation formed in their interaction. Opportunities for social organizations to be engaged in social governance are mainly from the government’s empowerment by creating institutional space and the initiative of social organizations through multiple strategies, including compliance, cooperation, negotiation and even confrontation. Continuous acquisition of such opportunities requires urgently the formation of a powerful joint force from the external force provided by the government and the internal force of social organizations. The joint force depends not only on their “common interests” and self-engagement competence of social organizations, but also on the improvement of the institutional environment amid their virtuous interaction.

Key words: social organizations, social governance, access to participation, institutional environment, institutional implementation

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 曹爱军, 方晓彤. 社会治理与社会组织成长制度构建[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2019(2): 94-100
[2] 中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定[N].2013-11-16(1).
[3] 习近平: 决胜全面建成小康社会  夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. (2017-10-27). http://www.xinhuanet.com/2017-10/27/c_1121867529.htm.
[4] 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议[N].人民日版,2020-11-4 (1).
[5] 张康之. 合作的社会及其治理[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2014: 163-164.
[6] 黄晓春. 当代中国社会组织的制度环境与发展[J]. 中国社会科学, 2015(9): 146-164, 206-207
[7] 周雪光. 组织社会学十讲[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2003: 72.
[8] DIMAGGIO P J, POWELL W W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American sociological review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160
[9] STINCHCOMBE A L. Social structure and organizations[M]// J G MARCH. Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand Mcnally, 1965: 142-193.
[10] 俞可平, 等. 中国公民社会的制度环境[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006: 13-22.
[11] 张杰. 我国社会组织发展制度环境析论[J]. 广东社会科学, 2014(2): 208-213
[12] 高丙中. 社会团体的合法性问题[J]. 中国社会科学, 2000(2): 100-109, 207
[13] 陈成文, 黄开腾. 制度环境与社会组织发展: 国外经验及其政策借鉴意义[J]. 探索, 2018(1): 144-152
[14] 刘春湘, 曾芳. 生命周期视角下制度环境对社会组织活力的影响[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2018(5): 149-156
[15] 黄晓春. 中国社会组织成长条件的再思考——一个总体性理论视角[J]. 社会学研究, 2017(1): 101-124, 244
[16] 俞可平. 中国公民社会: 概念、分类与制度环境[J]. 中国社会科学, 2006(1): 109-122, 207-208
[17] 王诗宗, 宋程成. 独立抑或自主: 中国社会组织特征问题重思[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(5): 50-66, 205
[18] 陈成文, 黄诚. 论优化制度环境与激发社会组织活力[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(1): 50-56
[19] 庞明礼, 薛金刚. 政策模糊与治理绩效: 基于对政府间分权化改革的观察[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(10): 120-125
[20] 纪莺莺. 当代中国行业协会商会的政策影响力: 制度环境与层级分化[J]. 南京社会科学, 2015(9): 65-72
[21] 姜耀辉, 刘春湘. 社会组织制度环境: 经验测量及其政策意义[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2020(3): 100-110
[22] 纪莺莺. 国家中心视角下社会组织的政策参与: 以行业协会为例[J]. 人文杂志, 2016(4): 116-122
[23] 刘春湘, 姜耀辉. 社会组织参与养老服务的逻辑框架: 制度环境·主体类型·实践方式[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5): 37-47
[24] SPIRES A. Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: understanding the survival of China’s Grassroots NGOs[J]. American journal of sociology, 2011, 117(1): 1-45
[25] 管兵. 城市政府结构与社会组织发育[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(4): 129-153, 244-245
[26] 叶托. 环保社会组织参与环境治理的制度空间与行动策略[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(6): 50-57.
[27] 中国共产党十六届三中全会公报[EB/OL]. (2003-10-14). https://news.sina.com.cn/c/2003-10-14/21231921305.shtml.
[28] 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜  为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗 ——在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. [2021-03-05]. http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64162/64168/106155/106156/6430009.html.
[29] 胡锦涛在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. (2012-11-18). http://cpc.people.com.cn/n/2012/1118/c64094-19612151.html.
[30] 中共中央. 关于加强社会主义协商民主建设的意见[ EB/OL]. (2015-02-09). http://www.xinhuanet.com//politics/2015-02/09/c_1114310670_2.htm.
[31] 中共中央, 国务院. 关于加快推进生态文明建设的意见[EB/OL].(2015-05-05). http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-05/05/c_1115187518.htm.
[32] 姚华. NGO与政府合作中的自主性何以可能?——以上海YMCA为个案[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(1): 21-42, 241-242
[33] 浙江省民政厅. 关于进一步规范提升社会组织参与社会治理工作的实施意见[ EB/OL].(2018-07-02). http://mzt.zj.gov.cn/art/2018/7/2/art_1229266288_1231460.html.
[34] 王名, 王春婷. 推位让治: 社会组织参与社会治理路径[J]. 开放导报, 2014(5): 7-11
[35] 安东尼·吉登斯. 社会的构成——结构化理论纲要[M]. 李康, 李猛, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016: 8.
[1] ZHU Hao, XU Shuhong. The Dilemma and Mechanism Innovation of Social Organizations Participating in the Supply of Children’s Welfare Services: A Case Study of Shanghai [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 70-78.
[2] ZHUO Caiqin, ZHANG Xuehui, ZHANG Qianxin. The Path of Social Organizations for the Disabled to Participate in Social Governance: A Case Study Based on Guangdong Association of the Blind [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 50-60.
[3] GUO Weihe. Study on the Relationship between State Governance and Community Governance and Modernization of Their Coordinated Evolution [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 5-15.
[4] FANG Ying. Cooperation with Boundary: The New Relationship between Social Work Organization, the Subdistrict Office and the Neighborhood Committee [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 58-68.
[5] WANG Tianxia. Village Elites, Farmers’ Self-Organization and Rural Social Governance Path Innovation: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spring Festival Evening of Villagers in A Village [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(3): 84-91,100.
[6] HUANG Qinglin. Disease, Rumours and the Social Governance of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao in Late 19th Centutry [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 79-85,92.
[7] GU Jiang-xia. Exploring the Forming Process of “Community, Social Organizations and Social Workers” Joint Action Mechanism in Urban Community: Based on the Experience of a Pilot Plan in S City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 86-92.
[8] YIN Pingjun, HUANG Wenlin. Construction of Educational Welfare System for New Generation Migrant Workers: From the Perspectives of Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 81-91.
[9] TANG Yong. Hospice Care and Social Governance Innovation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(4): 46-53,74.
[10] REN Wenqi. Judicial Social Work: The Return and Development of People's Mediation in the New Era [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(3): 5-11,27.
[11] CAI Xiang, CHEN Sheying. NGO and Social Development: Social Organization, Community Building and Grassroots Social Governance in the Post-Economic State Era [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(3): 72-77.
[12] LU Wengang, WANG Yaxuan. Response to Social Organization Trust Crisis and Brand Reconstruction from the Perspective of Social Governance: Based on the Theory of Disaster Causes [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 45-54.
[13] SUN Kuili, WANG Guoyou, ZENG Minrui. A Study of Community-Social Organization -Social Worker Combined Interaction in the Context of Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 55-62.
[14] LAI Shuai. The Innovative Development Path of Community-Social Organization-Social Worker Combined Interaction in Tibetan Urban Communities [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 69-74.
[15] CHEN Weizhi. The Construction, Characteristics and Significance of Governance Discourse System of the Ruling Party in the New Period [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(5): 85-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!