SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 62-70.

• SHEHUI GONGZUO • Previous Articles    

Postnate Exogenic Empowerment: Development of Party Building in Social Work Institutions and Its Influencing Factors: An Empirical Research Based on CSWLS2019

JU Zheng1,2, YU Tieshan1   

  1. 1. School of Law and Social Work,Dongguan University of Technology,Dongguan, Guangdong, 523808;
    2. Department of Social Work, Taiwan National Chengchi University, Taibei, Taiwan, 10617, China
  • Received:2022-06-03 Published:2023-01-10

Abstract: From the perspective of the development of Party building in social work institutions, this paper puts forward a mode of Party building, namely the postnate-exogenic empowerment mode. Based on “the Data of China Social Work Longitudinal Study in 2019” (CSWLS2019), the authors focus on the current situation and influencing factors of the establishment of the Party building departments in social work institutions, the party building manpower and Party building decisions. It is found that the coverage of Party building in social work institutions is not high. There is a lack of full-time personnel, and the frequency of organizational life is low. Further statistical analysis from the aspects of Party building departments, Party building personnel, and Party building decisions power shows that, first, social work institutions engaged in community services and rescue services are more likely to establish Party building departments. Second, the support (counterpart) funds and policy facilitation provided by the government will increase the possibility for social work institutions to establish Party building departments. The evaluation will increase the possibility for social work institutions to select full-time Party building personnel. Third, social work institutions in some fields have given full play to the role of Party building decisions. Accordingly, the future development of Party building in social work institutions should shift from postnate-exogenic type to starter endogenetic type, and highlight the leading role of Party building in professional services.

Key words: postnate-exogenic, social work institutions, Party building

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 中华人民共和国民政部. 2020年民政事业统计公报[EB/OL]. (2021-09-10). https://images3.mca.gov.cn/www2017/file/202109/1631265147970.pdf.
[2] 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议[EB/OL].(2020-11-03). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-11/03/content_5556991.htm.
[3] 2019年全国民政视频会议召开[EB/OL]. (2019-01-06). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-01/06/content_5355278.htm.
[4] 中共中央办公厅印发《关于加强社会组织党的建设工作的意见(试行)》 [EB/OL]. (2015-09-28). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-09/28/content_2939936.htm.
[5] 中共中央印发《中国共产党支部工作条例(试行)》[EB/OL]. (2018-12-25). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-11/25/content_5343236.htm?tdsourcetag=s_pcqq_aiomsg.
[6] 胡辉华, 张丹婷. 国家治理体系中的社会组织党建及其面临的挑战[J]. 新视野, 2020(3): 24-31
[7] 肖金明, 杨伟伟. 从“嵌入”走向“嵌合”: 社会组织党建模式创新探析[J]. 中州学刊, 2021(4): 14-20
[8] 唐兴军. 从嵌入耦合到驱动引领: 社会组织党建的逻辑与路向[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(1): 33-39
[9] 张紧跟, 庄少英. 党建何以引领社工机构发展——以A市F机构为例[J]. 中共福建省委党校(福建行政学院)学报, 2021(6): 36-46
[10] 袁校卫. 从嵌入到融合: 新时代新型社会组织的党建路径探析[J]. 河南社会科学, 2020(9): 48-53
[11] 刘蕾, 邱鑫波. 社会组织党建: 嵌入式发展与组织力提升[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2019(6): 31-38
[12] 彭小兵, 李文静. 赋权: 党建引领与社会工作互嵌的社区治理探索——基于重庆市T社区的实践[J]. 社会工作, 2020(2): 78-88,112
[13] 童敏, 许嘉祥, 蔡诗婕. 大党建与社会工作: 党建社会工作实践的现代性反思[J]. 社会建设, 2021(2): 35-45
[14] 韦克难, 陈晶环. 新时代社会组织党的建设: 时代议题与现实景观——基于四川省176 个样本的调查研究[J]. 南京社会科学, 2019(7): 85-91
[15] 王恒胤. 社会治理共同体: 党建标准化视野下党建社工的功能定位[J]. 广西社会科学, 2021(12): 144-149
[16] 于铁山. 党建社会工作岗位: 内涵目标、功能定位与发展路径[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2020(3): 59-61
[17] 黄晓星, 丁行琴. 党建引领专业: 社会工作参与党群服务的实践类型及机制分析[J]. 江海学刊, 2022(2): 108-116, 255
[18] 周双磊. 社会工作参与社会组织党建实践研究——基于N市S社会组织平台的考察[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2022(1): 148-157
[19] 吴耀健, 陈安娜, 黎仁刚. 专业、政治与党建社会工作的增能模式——对一个珠三角楼盘小区的个案分析[J]. 社会工作, 2019(5): 76-87, 110-111
[20] 赖先进. 社会组织党建会制约区域社会组织发展吗?——基于31省份面板数据的实证研究[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 2021(3): 40-48
[21] 严宏. 中国共产党社会组织党建策略选择: 支配、适应、互惠抑或协商[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2018(1): 172-177
[22] 马西恒. 民间组织发展与执政党建设——对上海市民间组织党建实践的思考[J]. 政治学研, 2003(1): 23-37
[23] 骆勇. 村民自治背景下的村庄政治资源配置与村民参与——以农村基层党组织吸收党员方式为例[J]. 行政与法, 2009(10): 77-79
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!