SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 81-90.

• SHEHUI GUANLI • Previous Articles    

Positively-Guided Participation: A Comparative Study on Engagement of Community-Based Organizations in Residential Districts on Community Governance

GU Jiangxia1, CHEN Minyi2, ZHANG Yanyu2   

  1. 1. School of Public Administration, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510320, China;
    2. Guangzhou Qichuang Social Work Service Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510230, China
  • Received:2022-05-12 Published:2023-01-10

Abstract: The study makes a comparative analysis of the engagement of community-based organizations of three residential districts in Guangzhou and Foshan on community governance in terms of organizational development, cultivating subjects, reasons for participating community governance, community mobilization of resident and the effectiveness of participation. The study finds out that the political capital and social capital from residents,community workers and social organizations cooperate and covert. Hence, community-based organizations undertake the responsibility of both developing political socialization and encouraging citizens’ participation in public affairs. The study concludes that community-based organizations that offer positive guidance can link residents together; the engagement of community-based organizations, which was built on joint contract, on community governance provides the possibility of cultivating residents’ equal participation in community governance. These proactive practices favor the cultivation of public spirit adapted to the modern social developments.

Key words: positively-guided participation, community participation, community-based organization, residential district

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 民政部. 关于大力培育发展社区社会组织的意见[EB/OL]. [2017-12-27]. https://xxgk.mca.gov.cn:8445/gdnps/pc/content.jsp?mtype=1&id=13167.
[2] 民政部办公厅. 培育发展社区社会组织专项行动方案(2021—2023年)[EB/OL]. (2020-12-08). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-12/08/content_5568379.htm.
[3] 郭于华, 沈原. 居住的政治——B市业主维权与社区建设的实证研究[J]. 开放时代, 2012(2): 83-101
[4] 黄晓星. 社区运动的“社区性”——对现行社区运动理论的回应与补充[J]. 社会学研究, 2011(1): 41-62, 243-244
[5] 陈幽泓. 从维权到治理的启蒙——北京美丽园冲突解决与秩序重构的启示[J]. 中国物业管理, 2009(8): 36-38
[6] 曾鹏. 社区网络与集体行动[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2008: 43-64.
[7] 石发勇. “准公民社区”: 中国城市基层治理的一个替代模型[J]. 社会科学, 2013(4): 59-70
[8] 吴晓林, 谢伊云. 房权意识何以外溢到城市治理?——中国城市社区业主委员会治理功能的实证分析[J]. 江汉论坛, 2018(1): 132-137
[9] THYNNE I, PETERS B G. Addressing the present and the future in government and governance: three approaches to organizing public action[J]. Public administration and development, 2015, 35(2): 73-85
[10] FRANSEN J, PERALTA D O, VANELLI F, et al. The emergence of urban community resilience initiatives during the covid-19 pandemic: an international exploratory study[J]. The European journal of development research, 2022, 34(2): 432-454
[11] 王汉生, 吴莹. 基层社会中“看得见”与“看不见”的国家——发生在一个商品房小区中的几个“故事”[J]. 社会学研究, 2011(1): 63-95, 244
[12] 陈晓运, 刘晓玥. 权威治理: 地方政府如何吸纳公民参与——基于广州案例的实证分析[J]. 中国公共政策评论, 2017(1): 90-107
[13] 戚玉, 徐选国. 从政社关系到党建引领: 理解社区治理的范式转化与经验嬗变——基于对上海沪街的实证研究[J]. 学习论坛, 2020(2): 79-86
[14] 刘欣, 田丰. 城市基层党建与社区社会资本生成——基层社区党建的延展效应[J]. 学术月刊, 2021(6): 160-170
[15] 闵学勤. 互嵌共生: 新场景下社区与物业的合作治理机制探究[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(1): 66-74
[16] KLEE D, MORDEY M, PHUARE S, et al. Asset based community development-enriching the lives of older citizens[J]. Working with older people, 2014, 18(3): 111-119
[17] 罗家德, 梁肖月. 社区营造的理论、流程与案例[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017: 16-38.
[18] 王本壮, 等. 社区×营造 政策规划与理论实践[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017: 97-114.
[19] 丘昌泰, 薛宇航. 台湾的第三部门与小区治理的创新: 以六星计划为例[J]. 开放时代, 2007(5): 5-21
[20] UBBINK M J, STRYDOM H. An empowerment narrative leadership program for a disadvantaged community[J]. Research on social work practice, 2019, 29(4): 443-454
[21] L BAILLIE, S BROUGHTON, J BASSETT-SMITH, et. al. Community health, community involvement, and community empowerment: too much to expect?[J]. Journal of community psychology, 2004, 32(2): 226-227
[22] 詹姆斯?德菲利皮斯. 全球资本下的社区治理[M]. 朱春奎, 石慧, 李玮, 等, 译. 上海: 格致出版社、上海人民出版社, 2017: 58-62.
[23] TOSUN C. Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries[J]. Tourism management, 2000(21): 613-633
[24] 简?雅各布斯. 美国大城市的死与生[M]. 金衡山, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2010: 127-128.
[25] 罗伯特?D. 帕特南. 使民主运转起来[M]. 王列, 赖海榕, 译. 南昌: 江西人民出版社, 2001: 195-196.
[26] 吴军, 夏建中. 国外社会资本理论: 历史脉络与前沿动态[J]. 学术界, 2012(8): 67-76, 264-268
[27] 罗家德, 方震平. 社区社会资本的衡量——一个引入社会网观点的衡量方法[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2014(1): 114-124
[28] 中共中央, 国务院. 关于加强和完善城乡社区治理的意见[EB/OL]. (2017-06-12). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-06/12/content_5201910.htm.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!