SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 35-46.

Previous Articles    

Practice Reflexivity and Knowledge Construction of “Professional Relationship” in Social Work: Action Research on the Integration of Teaching, Research, and Practice

WANG Haiyang   

  1. School of Law and Social Work, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523808, China
  • Received:2024-07-21 Published:2024-11-13

Abstract: In social work education, the practice reflexivity of teachers and students has plays a key role in knowledge production. Classrooms serve not only as spaces for knowledge transfer but also as environments for experience reference and knowledge co-creation. The professional relationship holds an important position in the social work knowledge system, forming the foundation of social work practice. By reflexively organizing past experiences of professional relations, teachers provide students with the experience reference and the local knowledge to understand the relationship between themselves, their community, and their future professional community, so as to stimulate students’ motivation to explore professional relationships. At the same time, teachers engage in dialogues with students’ experience texts regarding their inquiry into their relationship with the communities to enhance learning. When students’ community experience is organically integrated into the teaching, the connection between knowledge and teachers and students is strengthened. In this teaching process, students can not only acquire the relevant knowledge and experience of professional relationships but also experience the practical process of integrating personal experience and professional knowledge. This will further promote the organic combination of education, practice, and research, realize the knowledge production function of social work education, and promote the construction of the local knowledge of social work.

Key words: social work, professional relationship, practice reflexivity, knowledge construction

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 文军. 挑战与回应: 发展的不确定性与社会工作学科体系建设[J]. 社会工作, 2023(6): 5-8,97-98.
[2] 侯利文, 徐永祥. 被忽略的实践智慧: 迈向社会工作实践研究的新方法论[J]. 社会科学, 2018(6): 82-93.
[3] 杨静. 社会工作教育需要知行合一的教育行动者[J]. 中国青年政治学院学报, 2014(2): 117-121.
[4] 王海洋, 尚静. 基层社会治理场景中社会工作的专业化发展——基于“主体性—协同性”的分析框架[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(5): 52-65.
[5] 杨静. 朝向人性化改变的理论——《受压迫者教育学》的解读及对社会工作的启示[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(3): 46-56.
[6] 丁瑜, 邱博文, 张凯婷. 家庭社会工作实践中个人经验与专业经验的关系探讨——兼论性别对界限的影响[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2023(4): 58-72.
[7] 费梅苹, 杨瑛. 发展核心自我: 流动社会中自我视角社会工作的重构[J]. 社会科学研究, 2023(4): 122-129.
[8] 侯利文. 社会工作知识论基础的再认识——兼论社会工作的实践转向[J]. 学习与实践, 2019(5): 68-77.
[9] 肖瑛. 反思与自反: 反身性视野下的社会学与风险社会[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2020: 171.
[10] 彭善民, 宋文然, 王亚芳. 德国社会工作发展范式及启示[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(6): 1-9,17.
[11] 王海洋, 王芳萍, 夏林清. 社会工作实践知识的意涵与发展路径——兼论反映实践取向行动研究路数[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(3): 1-12.
[12] 吴帆, 吴佩伦. 社会工作中的“赋权陷阱”: 识别与行动策略[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(5): 10-20.
[13] TURNER J. Social work treatment: interlocking theoretical approaches[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017: 223-239.
[14] GOLDSTEIN E G. Ego psychology ang social work practice[M] . 2nd ed. New York: The Free Press, 1995: 201.
[15] 童敏. 社会工作理论: 历史环境下社会服务实践者的声音和智慧[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019: 300-302.
[16] 张和清, 廖其能. 乡镇(街道)专业社会工作发展中互为主体性建构研究——以广东“双百计划”为例[J]. 社会工作, 2020(5): 30-34.
[17] 王海洋. 社会工作充权实践与专业关系变革——以行动研究为实践路径[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(4): 39-48.
[18] 赵万林. 从双重关系到友伦之“善”——社会工作双重关系话语的重构[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2021(6): 146-153.
[19] 杜平. 专业关系的情境化建构: 基于“让我们做朋友-河北”的个案分析[J]. 社会建设, 2020(6): 42-53.
[20] 刘玲. 本土社会工作者与案主关系研究——微观结构、关系特征和行动依据[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(4): 27-36.
[21] 何雪松, 匡梦叶, 吴漪岚. 2023年社会工作研究年度进展述评[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024(2): 1-18.
[22] 保罗·弗雷勒. 受压迫者教育学[M]. 方永泉, 译. 台北: 巨流图书公司, 2013: 109.
[23] 夏林清. 教育实践中的多重对话关系: 回应潘世尊老师的行动研究[J]. 应用心理研究(中国台湾), 2000(8): 239-244.
[24] 唐纳德·A.舍恩. 反映的实践者: 专业工作者如何在行动中思考[M]. 夏林清, 译. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2007.
[25] 贝尔·胡克斯. 教学越界: 教育即自由的实践[M]. 刘美慧, 等, 译. 台北: 学富文化事业有限公司, 2009.
[26] 张洋勇, 徐明心. 社会工作专业教育的转向: 美国的历程和启示[J]. 社会科学战线, 2022(6): 232-245.
[27] 童敏. 理论和实践的整合——社会工作课程专业化设计的反思[C]// 中国社会工作教育协会. 社会工作专业化及本土化实践——中国社会工作教育协会2003—2004论文集. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2003: 9.
[28] 苗怀宁. 社会工作本土专业价值观的现象学重构[J]. 社会工作, 2013(6): 48-58, 153.
[29] 张和清, 徐菲. 新文科建设背景下中国社会工作教育反思[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022(6): 14-20.
[30] 陈向明. 实践—反思性行动研究的意涵和路径[J]. 人民教育, 2023(Z3): 109-112.
[31] 夏林清, 郑村棋. 行动科学: 实践中的探究[M]. 台北: 张老师出版社, 1989: 124.
[32] 王海洋. 社会工作的实践自觉: 理论蕴涵与实现路径[J]. 学海, 2023(5): 146-155.
[33] 张慧鹏. 当乡建情怀遭遇经济规律: 对当代新乡村建设运动的反思[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(1): 121-136.
[34] 张剑, 亓媛. 新乡村建设运动对农村社区社会工作的启示[J]. 山东青年政治学院学报, 2017(3): 19-22.
[35] 晏阳初. 十年来的中国乡村建设(1937年)[M]//宋恩荣, 晏阳初全集(第1卷). 长沙: 湖南教育出版社, 1989.
[36] 张英阵, 郑怡世. 再探Jane Addams的社区工作理念[J]. 社会政策与社会工作学刊(中国台湾), 2012(1): 87-132.
[37] 景军. 现代预防医学在乡土中国的实践源头和本土化过程: 定县实验[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018(7): 1-6.
[38] 钱理群. 论志愿者文化[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 2018: 536-539.
[39] 朱晓阳. 在参与式时代谈建构"性别主体"的困境[J]. 开放时代, 2005(1): 140-148.
[40] 朱健刚, 邓红丽, 熊婧茹. 参与式发展的路径比较: 对社会组织参与乡村振兴的反思——基于广东省G市L村的案例研究[J]. 理论探讨, 2023(3): 91-98.
[41] 朱健刚, 胡明. 多元共治: 对灾后社区重建中参与式发展理论的反思——以“5·12”地震灾后社区重建中的新家园计划为例[J]. 开放时代, 2011(10): 5-25.
[42] 卢敏, 成华威, 李小云, 等. 参与式农村发展: 理论·方法·实践[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008: 8-10.
[43] 孙国嫄. 公益“形意世界”中的“自我”转变——“80后”社会组织青年从业者价值观及行为研究[J]. 青年研究, 2020(2): 1-12,94.
[44] 陈宇. 乡镇社会工作嵌入式发展的行动逻辑及实现路径[J]. 学术论坛, 2023(6): 97-105.
[45] 朱战辉. 农村青年就地城镇化实践机制分析——基于珠三角D镇的经验调研[J]. 中国青年研究, 2019(4): 75-81,118.
[46] 高飞. 城乡融合进程中“三元化社区”治理困境及其解释——以珠三角龙腾区为观察对象[J]. 河南社会科学, 2021(9): 106-115.
[47] 叶文梓. 论大学师生对话关系[J]. 江苏高教, 2001(4): 74-76.
[48] 王思斌. 坚持乡镇社工站建设的专业化和本地化[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(34): 7.
[49] 杨慧, 吕哲臻. 情感异化与情感唤醒:教师情感劳动的现代议题[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2023(2): 187-200.
[50] 熊和妮, 王晓芳. 西方大学教学学术的合法化困境与转型方向[J]. 教育学报, 2024(4): 113-125.
[1] ZHANG Fanghua, LIU Yijun, CHEN Zhaoman. The Developmental Difficulties and Countermeasures of Evidence-Based Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 1-9.
[2] ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Yong. Analysis and Understanding Differences about the Scope of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 10-17,26.
[3] YAN Yunhe, LIN Yuchen. Social Work Intervention in the College Student Assistance Program (SAP): Theoretical Basis, Practical Exploration, and Prospects [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 27-34.
[4] TANG Yong, YAN Ying. Work Role, Professional Identity and Work Emotion of Civil Affairs Social Workers: An Analysis Based on the Data of the China Social Work Longitudinal Study in 2019 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 1-11.
[5] ZHANG Pengfei, WU Jiajun, WANG Juan. The Philosophical Basis,Explanatory Framework and Research Enlightenment of Social Work Practice Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 12-21.
[6] DENG Shilun. Analysis and Reflection on Ethical Dilemmas in Anti-Drug Social Work Practice: Re-Understanding Based on Ethical Absolutism and Ethical Relativism [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 22-30.
[7] WU Xiaolong, Wang Xinyue. The Intervention Mechanism and Practical Logic of “Acupuncture Concept” in the Digital Divide of Rural Elderly [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 31-39,63.
[8] LIU Yan, WANG Xiaoping. Behavioral Significance and Action Space of Social Work Participation in Rural Revitalization from the Perspective of Urban-Rural Integration [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 47-54.
[9] TANG Haoran, LUO Qiao. Companionship, Linkage, and Inverted Sense of Practice: The Role Shaping Process of Social Workers in Environmental Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 55-63.
[10] ZHANG Liqin, HUANG Jiapeng. “Localized” Supply: The Practical Analysis of Grassroots Civil Affairs Services in Township Social Work Stations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 64-73.
[11] TANG Genghua, Liu Xiang. Research on the Regional Characteristics of Social Work Policies in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 94-102.
[12] WU Jing. Analysis of the Current Situation and Development of Social Work in Social Enterprise Operations: Take Chengdu’s Practice as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(4): 9-19.
[13] SUN Wanghui, LUO Mingjun. An Intervention Study of “Reading + Game” Therapy to Alleviate Children’s Fear of Medical Treatment [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(4): 41-51.
[14] CHENG Yu, CUI Changjie. Research on the Professional Advantages of Medical Social Work in the Construction of Inclusive Hospice Care System from the Whole Person Care [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(3): 1-11.
[15] ZENG Shouchui, XU Xinyi, ZHANG Huanhuan. A Preliminary Test of the Content Validity of Social Worker’s Professional Level Examination [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(3): 12-21,68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!