SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 70-80,93.

• SHEHUI GUANLI • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study on the Influencing Factors and Improving Strategies of Self-Worth of the Elderly Migrants

LIANG Jiewen, ZHANG Guohong   

  1. Research Center of Social Work, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China
  • Received:2024-04-16 Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-01-15

Abstract: The floating elderlies (Lao piao zu) refers to the migrating elderlies who migrate to their children’s place to support their children and take care of their grandchildren. Drawing froms in-depth interviews with 15 representative cases of H community in Guangzhou, this study adopts the grounded theory approach and the ecosystem theory to identify factors that influence the elderly migrants’ self-worth through three-level coding. The influencing factors are categorized into five dimensions: physical fitness, life concept, family relationship, interpersonal relationship and social relations. Building on this foundation, professional social work methods are adopted at the micro level to improve the migrant elderlies’ sense of physical and psychological values by enhancing their learning ability, exercising their identity, and changing their irrational beliefs. At the meso-level, the focus is on strengthening migrant elderlies’ sense of family value and interpersonal value by reviewing the past and exploring their advantage potential. At the macro level, the aim is to enrich their social values by linking social resources and bolster social identity. These strategies are to enhance migrant elderlies’ self-worse and facilitate their better integration into urban life thus promote the harmonious development of the society.

Key words: the elderly migrants, ecological systems theory, self-worth, social work

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 许加明, 华学成. 流动的老年: “老漂族”的形成机制与多重角色困境[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(5): 39-48,162.
[2] 广州市老龄工作委员会办公室. 广州市发布2023年老年人口和老龄事业数据 [EB/OL]. [2024-10-09]. https://www.gz.gov.cn/zwgk/zdly/mzxx/yljgjbxx/content/post_9900768.html.
[3] 胡小武, 韩雪. 流动的悖论: 从城市“老漂族”到返乡空巢老人研究[J]. 河北学刊, 2024(2): 178-185.
[4] 穆光宗. “老漂族”的群体现状与社会适应[J]. 人民论坛, 2021(12): 64-66.
[5] 杨菊华. 空间理论视角下老年流动人口的社会适应[J]. 社会学研究, 2021(3): 180-203,229-230.
[6] 黄丽芬. 进城还是返乡?——社会空间与“老漂族”的自我实现[J]. 北京社会科学, 2019(11): 4-14.
[7] 杨菊华, 卢瑞鹏. “漂老”与“老漂”: 国内老年流动人口的研究进展与展望[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(1): 84-94.
[8] 刘厚莲. 靠谁养老、去哪养老: 乡城流动人口养老意愿分析[J]. 人口与发展, 2019(3): 57-66.
[9] 孙昕, 钟仁耀. 抑制还是促进: “老漂族”的隔代照料对身份认同的影响[J]. 社会保障研究, 2021(3): 50-58.
[10] 钟仁耀, 孙昕. “老漂族”的类型差异及其影响因素研究——基于“认知—行为”双维度框架[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(1): 70-78.
[11] 廖佩璇. 积极老龄化视角下农村“老漂族”精神养老问题研究[J]. 市场周刊, 2022(1): 7-8,46.
[12] 张国英, 赖依阳, 刘业青. 福利多元主义视角下城市“老漂族”精神赡养问题研究——以广州市三个典型社区为例[J]. 南方人口, 2021(1): 57-67.
[13] 刘庆. “老漂族”的城市社会适应问题研究: 社会工作介入的策略[J]. 西北人口, 2012(4): 23-26, 31.
[14] 彭大松. 家庭化流动背景下老年流动人口的城市融入研究[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020(6): 105-114.
[15] JAMES W. The principles of psychology[M]. Cambrigde, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983: 296.
[16] COOPERSMITH S. The antecedents of self-esteem[M]. San Francisco: Freeman, 1967.
[17] CROCKER J, KATHERINE M K. Contingencies of self-worth[J]. Current directions in psychological science, 2005, 14(4): 200-203.
[18] 黄希庭, 杨雄. 青年学生自我价值感量表的编制[J]. 心理科学, 1998(4): 289-292,382.
[19] 杨芳, 杜遥, 郑思莹, 等. 老年人自我价值感影响因素的探索性研究——基于G市老年人的调查分析[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2017(36): 34-39.
[20] SHAVELSON R J, HABNER J J, STANTON G C. Validation of construct interpretations[J]. Review of educational research, 1976, 46: 407-441.
[21] 骆艳萍. 成年人自我价值感问卷的初步编制[D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2010: 44-45.
[22] 宋伊. 老年人自我价值感及其与身体自我关系的研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2013: 18.
[23] 杨烨. 自我价值感二维模型的理论架构与实证研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2008: 87.
[24] 查尔斯·H.扎斯特罗, 卡伦·K.柯斯特阿什曼. 人类行为与社会环境[M]. 6版. 师海玲, 孙岳, 等, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2006.
[25] GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research[M]. London: Routledge, 2017.
[26] 陈向明. 扎根理论的思路和方法[J]. 教育研究与实验, 1999(4): 58-63.
[27] 李志刚. 扎根理论方法在科学研究中的运用分析[J]. 东方论坛, 2007(4): 90-94.
[28] 戴诗. 运用增能理论视角探析城市社区失能老人的居家养老模式[J]. 社会福利(理论版), 2014(2): 21-24.
[29] 全国社会工作者职业水平考试教材编写组. 社会工作实务: 中级[M]. 北京: 中国社会出版社, 2007: 147.
[30] 纪梦琦, 范文杰. 体育促进“老漂族”社会融入作用机制与路径探析[J]. 体育文化导刊, 2019(1): 17-21.
[31] 任玉嘉, 唐蓉, 肖腊梅. 锻炼认同对社区老年人精神幸福感的影响: 社会支持的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2022(5): 1130-1133.
[32] 王竹换, 庞鑫. 浅析认知行为理论在社会工作实务中的运用[J]. 法制与社会, 2009(2): 225-226.
[33] 王思斌. 社会工作概论(第3版)[M]. 北京: 中国社会出版社, 2018: 209.
[34] GOULDNER A W. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement[J]. American sociological review, 1960(2): 161-178.
[1] LIANG Yucheng, LEI Jie, SU Zhenhao, DU Yanrong. Digital Social Work: Expert Consensus on Definition, Significance, and Practice (2024) [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 1-9.
[2] BU He, TANG Yao, DUAN Wenjie. Pathways of the Intersection of Social Work Practice and Artificial Intelligence [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 10-18.
[3] LIU Yulan. Research on the Reconstruction of Community Rehabilitation Service System for Disabled Children from the Perspective of Developmental Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 19-26.
[4] HONG Pei, SHI Haoyu. How to Make Knowledge Transformation Possible? Action Research on Practice-Based Teaching in Social Work Practice Courses [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 27-37.
[5] WU Juan. Progress and Prospects of Practice Research on Social Work in China: Quantitative Analysis Based on CSSCI Journal Literature from 1998 to 2023 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 38-48.
[6] JIN Chaoran, XI Xiaohua. Advocate in Service: A Research of Path of Social Work Police Advocacy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 81-93.
[7] ZHANG Fanghua, LIU Yijun, CHEN Zhaoman. The Developmental Difficulties and Countermeasures of Evidence-Based Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 1-9.
[8] ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Yong. Analysis and Understanding Differences about the Scope of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 10-17,26.
[9] YAN Yunhe, LIN Yuchen. Social Work Intervention in the College Student Assistance Program (SAP): Theoretical Basis, Practical Exploration, and Prospects [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 27-34.
[10] WANG Haiyang. Practice Reflexivity and Knowledge Construction of “Professional Relationship” in Social Work: Action Research on the Integration of Teaching, Research, and Practice [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 35-46.
[11] HAN Yangdi, LUO Xiaoxia, LI Manya, GUO Jinmeng. Research on Social Work Service Effectiveness, Evolution and Prospects: A Systematic Review Study Based on Western Systematic Reviews [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 47-58.
[12] TANG Yong, YAN Ying. Work Role, Professional Identity and Work Emotion of Civil Affairs Social Workers: An Analysis Based on the Data of the China Social Work Longitudinal Study in 2019 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 1-11.
[13] ZHANG Pengfei, WU Jiajun, WANG Juan. The Philosophical Basis,Explanatory Framework and Research Enlightenment of Social Work Practice Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 12-21.
[14] DENG Shilun. Analysis and Reflection on Ethical Dilemmas in Anti-Drug Social Work Practice: Re-Understanding Based on Ethical Absolutism and Ethical Relativism [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 22-30.
[15] WU Xiaolong, Wang Xinyue. The Intervention Mechanism and Practical Logic of “Acupuncture Concept” in the Digital Divide of Rural Elderly [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 31-39,63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!