SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 81-93.

• SHEHUI ZHENGCE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Advocate in Service: A Research of Path of Social Work Police Advocacy

JIN Chaoran1, XI Xiaohua2   

  1. 1. School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai ,200237, China;
    2. College of Political Science and Law, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100089, China
  • Received:2024-04-26 Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-01-15

Abstract: Policy advocay is an essential aspect of macro social work. However, it represents a weak point in both the theory and practice of social work in our country.To illustrate this point, this study examines policy advocacy actions in juvenile judicial protection over the past two decades. It analyzes the localization path of social work policy advocacy, focusing on the actions of authoritative departments. The findings reveal that China’s social work policy advocacy differs significantly from practices in western traditions. In China, the authoritative department plays a leading role in the policy-making process. Therefore, there exists a strong alignment between the process of social work policy advocacy and the process of authoritative department policy-making. The policy-making process of the authoritative department develops along the trajectory from “vague to clarity”, with social work policy advocacy aligning closely to this process. In initial stage of generating vague policies, social work advocates policies through service lobbying and exploratory services. In the phase of ambiguous clarity, social work carries out policy advocacy through comprehensive services, institutional lobbying, and policy suggestions. In the stage of clear policy administration, social work carries out policy advocacy through policy suggestions, policy publicity, and standardized services.

Key words: social work, policy advocate, policy course, vague-conflict

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 何雪松. 积极而非激进: 宏观社会工作的中国图景[J]. 学海, 2020(1): 119-122.
[2] International association of schools of social work[EB/OL].[2024-03-25]. https://www.iassw-aiets.org/global-definition-of-social-work-review-of-the-global-definition/.
[3] 关于进一步建立和完善办理未成年人刑事案件配套工作体系的若干意见[EB/OL].(2018-02-01). https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/sfjs/201802/t20180201_363816.shtml.
[4] 检察机关加强未成年人司法保护八项措施[EB/OL]. (2015-05-27). https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/nbgz/201505/t20150527_98154.shtml.
[5] 关于构建未成年人检查工作社会支持体系的合作框架协议[EB/OL]. (2018-02-28). https://www.spp.gov.cn/zdgz/201802/t20180228_368082.shtml.
[6] 未成年人司法社会工作服务规范: GB/T 42380-2023[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2023: 1-2.
[7] 中华人民共和国社区矫正法[EB/OL]. [2024-03-20]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5535331.htm.
[8] 中华人民共和国未成年人保护法[EB/OL].(2020-10-18). https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-10/18/content_5552113.htm.
[9] 中华人民共和国预防未成年人犯罪法[EB/OL].(2020-12-27). https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-12/27/content_5573667.htm.
[10] 陆健, 齐晔, 郭施宏, 等. 组织学习、知识生产与政策倡导——对环保组织行为演变的跨案例研究[J]. 中国非营利评论, 2019(2): 257-278.
[11] 金星. 非营利组织影响公共政策的途径——以怒江大坝建设为例[J]. 福建论坛(社科教育版), 2010(12): 71-72.
[12] 祝建兵. 社会组织政策倡导策略的分类与选择[J]. 中共福建省委党校学报, 2018(2): 78-86.
[13] 谭爽, 崔佳. 环境NGO的政策倡导实践——基于“倡议联盟框架”的分析[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(6): 23-32, 111.
[14] 杨金田, 赵越强, 贾文彤. 从倡导联盟框架理论看我国体育产业政策变迁[J]. 经济与管理, 2020(5): 88-92.
[15] 茅云云. 从环境议题看社会组织的政策倡导角色: 基于倡导联盟框架的分析[J]. 青少年研究与实践, 2021(3): 71-80.
[16] 董冰, 陈文斌. 未成年人犯罪刑事政策变迁路径——基于倡导联盟框架的分析[J]. 学术交流, 2015(10): 137-142.
[17] 鞠露萍,社会工作倡导研究[D].上海:上海师范大学,2017:15.
[18] 吴杰臻. 社会政策倡导的本土化策略研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2017: 6, 19-41.
[19] 吴骏. 广西社会工作服务机构参与城市社区治理研究[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2018(23): 7-8.
[20] 冯筱云. 合法性视角下社会组织的政策倡导机制[D]. 杭州: 杭州师范大学, 2019: 6, 37-41.
[21] 朱利娜. 结构化视角下促进流动儿童发展的社会工作行动策略研究[D]. 广州: 广东外语外贸大学, 2021: 14.
[22] 李小峰. 社会工作机构政策倡导的困境与对策研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2017: 22-25.
[23] 白洁. 社会工作者政策倡导面临的困难与对策研究[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2019(12): 271-272.
[24] 金超然, 张昱. 共识制造与空间生产: 社会工作政策倡导的二象性[J]. 社会工作, 2024(1): 80-100,162-164.
[25] 大岳秀夫. 政策过程[M]. 傅禄永, 译. 北京: 经济日报出版社. 1992: 3-4.
[26] HOWLETT M, RAMESH M. Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995: 11.
[27] 周芬芬. 地方政府在农村中小学布局调整中的执行策略——基于模糊—冲突模型的分析[J]. 教育与经济, 2006(3): 61-64.
[28] 胡业飞, 崔杨杨. 模糊政策的政策执行研究——以中国社会化养老政策为例[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015(2): 93-105,157.
[29] 官华, 杨钋. 社区教育政策执行差异性研究——基于模糊—冲突模型的分析[J]. 职教论坛, 2018(9): 78-85.
[30] 王正惠. 模糊—冲突矩阵: 城乡义务教育一体化政策执行模型构建探析[J]. 教育发展研究, 2016(6): 9-17.
[31] 袁方成, 康红军. “张弛之间”: 地方落户政策因何失效?——基于“模糊—冲突”模型的理解[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(1): 64-69.
[32] 王安琪, 尹文强, 马广斌, 等. 基于模糊—冲突模型的家庭医生政策执行困境分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020(4): 395-402.
[33] 竺乾威. 地方政府的政策执行行为分析: 以“拉闸限电”为例[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2012(2): 40-46.
[34] 冉冉. 中国环境政治中的政策框架特征与执行偏差[J]. 教学与研究, 2014(5): 55-63.
[35] BILL K. CHOU P. Civil service reform in China, 1993—2001: a case of implementation failure[J]. China: an international journal, 2004(2): 210-234.
[36] 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000.
[37] 姚建龙. 中国少年司法的历史、现状与未来[J]. 法律适用, 2017(19): 2-11.
[38] F.埃伦·内廷, 彼得·M.凯特纳, 史蒂文·L.麦克默特里. 宏观社会工作实务[M]. 刘继同, 隋玉杰, 等, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2006: 6.
[1] LIANG Yucheng, LEI Jie, SU Zhenhao, DU Yanrong. Digital Social Work: Expert Consensus on Definition, Significance, and Practice (2024) [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 1-9.
[2] BU He, TANG Yao, DUAN Wenjie. Pathways of the Intersection of Social Work Practice and Artificial Intelligence [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 10-18.
[3] LIU Yulan. Research on the Reconstruction of Community Rehabilitation Service System for Disabled Children from the Perspective of Developmental Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 19-26.
[4] HONG Pei, SHI Haoyu. How to Make Knowledge Transformation Possible? Action Research on Practice-Based Teaching in Social Work Practice Courses [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 27-37.
[5] WU Juan. Progress and Prospects of Practice Research on Social Work in China: Quantitative Analysis Based on CSSCI Journal Literature from 1998 to 2023 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 38-48.
[6] LIANG Jiewen, ZHANG Guohong. A Study on the Influencing Factors and Improving Strategies of Self-Worth of the Elderly Migrants [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 70-80,93.
[7] ZHANG Fanghua, LIU Yijun, CHEN Zhaoman. The Developmental Difficulties and Countermeasures of Evidence-Based Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 1-9.
[8] ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Yong. Analysis and Understanding Differences about the Scope of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 10-17,26.
[9] YAN Yunhe, LIN Yuchen. Social Work Intervention in the College Student Assistance Program (SAP): Theoretical Basis, Practical Exploration, and Prospects [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 27-34.
[10] WANG Haiyang. Practice Reflexivity and Knowledge Construction of “Professional Relationship” in Social Work: Action Research on the Integration of Teaching, Research, and Practice [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 35-46.
[11] HAN Yangdi, LUO Xiaoxia, LI Manya, GUO Jinmeng. Research on Social Work Service Effectiveness, Evolution and Prospects: A Systematic Review Study Based on Western Systematic Reviews [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 47-58.
[12] TANG Yong, YAN Ying. Work Role, Professional Identity and Work Emotion of Civil Affairs Social Workers: An Analysis Based on the Data of the China Social Work Longitudinal Study in 2019 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 1-11.
[13] ZHANG Pengfei, WU Jiajun, WANG Juan. The Philosophical Basis,Explanatory Framework and Research Enlightenment of Social Work Practice Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 12-21.
[14] DENG Shilun. Analysis and Reflection on Ethical Dilemmas in Anti-Drug Social Work Practice: Re-Understanding Based on Ethical Absolutism and Ethical Relativism [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 22-30.
[15] WU Xiaolong, Wang Xinyue. The Intervention Mechanism and Practical Logic of “Acupuncture Concept” in the Digital Divide of Rural Elderly [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(5): 31-39,63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!