SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 94-104.

Previous Articles    

The Impacts of Inter-Generational Support Types on the Depression of Adolescents in Urban and Rural Families: An Analysis Based on the 2020 CFPS Data

LIU Hongsheng1, LI Ziwei2   

  1. 1. School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710055, China;
    2. School of Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710049, China
  • Received:2024-04-18 Online:2025-03-15 Published:2025-03-15

PDF (PC)

7

Abstract: Based on the 2020 Chinese Family Panel Survey (CFPS) data, latent class analysis is used to identify the types of inter-generational support in urban and rural families, and OLS regression is used to analyze the impacts of inter-generational support types on the depression of urban and rural adolescents. It is found that: there is a significant difference in the depression levels between urban and rural adolescents, the depression level of rural adolescents is higher than that of urban adolescents, especially reflecting in hard work, happiness, joy and sadness factors; there is no significant difference in the depression levels between rural left-behind adolescents and non-left-behind adolescents; there are two types of inter-generational support in urban and rural families, named as “alienation and weak function” (35.17%) and “intimity and strong function” (64.83%); there is no significant difference in the types of inter-generational support between urban and rural teenagers, rural left-behind adolescents and non-left-behind adolescents; the types of inter-generational support only have a significant impact on the depression of rural adolescents, inter-generational support of “alienation and weak function” has an inhibitory effect, while inter-generational support of “intimity and strong function” has an enhancement effect, especially reflecting in low mood and hard life factors; there is obvious difference in the impacts of inter-generational support types on the depression between rural left-behind adolescents and non-left-behind adolescents, inter-generational support of “alienation and weak function” has an inhibitory effect on the depression of rural left-behind adolescents, while inter-generational support of “intimity and strong function” has an inhibitory effect on the depression of rural non-left-behind adolescents, especially reflecting in low mood, hard work and sadness factors.

Key words: types of inter-generational support, urban and rural adolescents, depression, rural left-behind adolescents, rural non-left-behind adolescents

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 国家疾病预防控制局. 健康中国行动——儿童青少年心理健康行动方案(2019—2022年)[EB/OL]. (2019-12-27). https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-12/27/content_5464437.htm.
[2] 国家疾病预防控制局. 关于加强心理健康服务的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2017-01-24). https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-01/24/content_5162861.htm#1.
[3] 好心情, 中国麻醉药品协会精神卫生分会. 《2023年度中国精神心理健康》蓝皮书[EB/OL]. (2023-10-09). https://www.haoxinqing.cn/article/detail31087.html.
[4] 郭菲, 王薪舒, 陈祉妍. 2022年青少年心理健康状况调查报告[M]//傅小兰, 张侃, 陈雪峰, 等. 中国国民心理健康发展报告(2021—2022). 北京: 社 会科学文献出版社. 2023: 35-39.
[5] 刘红升. 中国农村留守家庭亲子关系理论研究: 思想、评述、应用[J]. 社会科学论坛, 2021(4): 158-168.
[6] 刘红升, 詹露露, 赵雅欣, 等. 社会生态系统框架下农村留守儿童抑郁影响因素分析[J]. 中国农村卫生事业管理, 2023(9): 615-619.
[7] 李强. 社会支持与个体心理健康[J]. 天津社会科学, 1998(1): 67-70.
[8] 刘红升, 李紫薇, 詹露露, 等. 社会支持与农村留守儿童心理健康的关系研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(3): 21-36.
[9] 刘红升, 刘利鸽, 靳小怡. 农村留守家庭的亲子关系类型: 识别、特征和分化[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2021(3): 147-156.
[10] 雷辉, 李景萱, 张小崔. 社会支持对青少年抑郁的影响: 有调节的中介效应分析[J]. 心理月刊, 2022(2): 39-42.
[11] 张登浩, 邵蕾, 张积家. 社会排斥对朝鲜族青少年抑郁的影响——以民族认同的中介作用为视角[J]. 贵阳学院学报(社会科学版), 2019(5): 51-55.
[12] 张瑞平, 王亚兵, 郭雅倩, 等. 学校氛围与留守青少年抑郁的关系: 感恩与自我控制的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022(2): 301-305.
[13] 张兴慧, 刘丽琼, 刘海燕, 等. 校园安全与青少年抑郁的关系: 社会退缩的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022(7): 966-971.
[14] 李荣, 王玉龙, 赵婧斐. 父母冲突和友谊质量对青少年抑郁发展趋势的影响[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2023(2): 455-458,401.
[15] 陈佳怡, 赵颖, 李可晗, 等. 儿童青少年网络欺凌现状及其与焦虑、抑郁症状的关联性分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2022(5): 808-813.
[16] 房燕娜, 曹乾, 兰莹利. 中国儿童青少年抑郁现状及性别、城乡差异分析[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2023(4): 380-387.
[17] 孙可馨. 家庭社会经济地位与青少年抑郁症状的关系: 负性生活事件的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理月刊, 2021(24): 15-17,113.
[18] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年抑郁: 同胞关系和心理韧性的作用[J]. 心理学探新, 2024(1): 52-59.
[19] 胡义秋, 何震, 曾子豪, 等. 亲子关系对青少年抑郁的影响: 认知灵活性和友谊质量的作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2023(3): 682-687.
[20] WICKERSHAM A, LEIGHTLEY D, ARCHER M, et al. The association between paternal psychopathology and adolescent depression and anxiety: a systematic review[J]. Journal of adolescence, 2020, 79(1): 232-246.
[21] 刘红升, 李紫薇. 隔代教养、隔代亲合与留守儿童心理健康的关系——一项Meta分析[J]. 社会治理, 2024(1): 73-86.
[22] 侯佳璐, 康凤英, 焦玉, 等. 童年创伤与青少年抑郁的关系: 社会支持和应对方式的中介作用[J]. 护理研究, 2022(16): 2909-2913.
[23] 龚芳敏, 易培, 吴一波. 媒介使用行为对青少年抑郁情绪的影响——家庭健康和自我效能的链式中介作用[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(6): 124-136.
[24] 牛更枫, 范翠英, 周宗奎, 等. 青少年乐观对抑郁的影响: 心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015(4): 709-711,681.
[25] 李玖玲, 陈星, 赵春华, 等. 中国儿童青少年抑郁症状流行率的Meta分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2016(3): 295-298.
[26] 康白雪, 李迎镇, 陈洁. 独生与非独生青少年抑郁症状的影响因素比较研究——基于济南市的调查[J]. 统计与管理, 2023(5): 29-40.
[27] 屈坚定, 余星池, 高伟娜, 等. 城乡青少年焦虑和抑郁症状调查[J]. 青年研究, 2003(1): 23-28.
[28] 左春容. 生活事件对中学生抑郁的影响——家庭亲密度和生命意义感的链式中介作用[D]. 成都: 西南大学, 2022: 16.
[29] 胡杰. 家庭功能与留守青少年抑郁的关系——自我概念的中介与同伴关系的调节[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2024: 36.
[30] HAYSLIP JR B, HENDERSON C E, SHORE R J. The structure of grandparental role meaning[J]. Journal of adult development, 2003, 10(1): 1-11.
[31] 刘红升, 李紫薇. 投桃报李?中国青少年隔代关系特征、类型及影响因素[J]. 社会建设, 2024(3): 77-100.
[32] KLEINER H S, HERTZOG J, TARG D B. Grandparents acting as parents: background information for educators[M]. Columbia, MO: ParentLink, 1998: 35-44.
[33] 郑佳然. 代际交换: 隔代抚养的实质与挑战[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(1): 113-119.
[34] WOOD V, ROBERTSON J F. The significance of grandparenthood[M]. New York: Human Sciences Press, 1976: 278-304.
[35] 朱家雄. 幼儿家庭教育大全[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1987: 10-15.
[36] 简才永, 植凤英, 叶静. 贵州少数民族地区祖孙关系的结构考评[J]. 社会心理科学, 2010(11-12): 39-45.
[37] MANGEN D J. Measuring intergenerational family relations[J]. Research on aging, 1986, 8(4): 515-535.
[38] BENGTSON V L, ROBERTS R E L. Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction[J]. Journal of marriage and the family, 1991, 53(4): 856-870.
[39] SILVERSTEIN M, BENGTSON V L. Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families[J]. American journal of sociology, 1997, 103(2): 429-460.
[40] CHEN F, LIU G, MAIR C A. Intergenerational ties in context: grandparents caring for grandchildren in China[J]. Social forces, 2011, 90(2): 571-594.
[41] CHOI S K, CHOI S E. A study on intergenerational affective solidarity in Korean families[J]. Survey research, 2012, 13(1): 89-112.
[42] BALES S S. The relation between the grandparent-grandchild bond and children’s views of themselves and grandparents[D]. Indianapolis: Indiana University, 2002: 5-13.
[43] 李燕平, 琚晓燕, 侯欣, 等. 农村“完全代理型”隔代抚养青少年的发展风险[J]. 中国青年社会科学, 2023(1): 10-18.
[44] 刘红升, 赵雅欣, 李紫薇, 等. 隔代教育对农村留守儿童心理健康的影响研究[J]. 健康教育与健康促进, 2023(4): 385-388.
[45] 古吉慧, 伍文杰. 隔代教养经历对初中生心理健康的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2012(10): 1246-1247.
[46] 李强, 谢明明. 农村隔代教育功能的堵塞及其疏导策略[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2012(10): 54-56.
[47] 赵景欣, 张婷, 林玲玉. 隔代亲合与农村留守儿童的抑郁: 留守烦恼认知评价的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016(6): 1092-1097.
[48] 孙萍. 隔代亲合与农村留守青少年的抑郁、生活满意度: 逆境信念的中介作用[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2018: 20.
[49] LI Q, ZHANG W, ZHAO J. The longitudinal associations among grandparent-grandchild cohesion, cultural beliefs about adversity, and depression in Chinese rural left-behind children[J]. Journal of health psychology, 2021, 26(1): 140-155.
[50] 穆光宗. 让隔代抚养回归慈孝之道[J]. 人民论坛, 2017(34): 63-65.
[51] 郑观蕾. 隔代照料者视角下的隔代照料——以广西富川瑶族自治县为例[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(2): 78-85.
[52] 卢富荣, 宋煜静, 刘路培, 等. 隔代教育对孙辈和祖辈的影响: 双刃剑效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020(10): 1733-1741.
[53] WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Orientation programme on adolescent health for health care providers[C]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006: 14.
[54] 刘红升, 靳小怡. 教养方式与留守儿童心理弹性: 特征和关系——来自河南省叶县的调查证据[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018(1): 222-229.
[55] 崔烨, 靳小怡. 亲近还是疏离?乡城人口流动背景下农民工家庭的代际关系类型分析——来自深圳调查的发现[J]. 人口研究, 2015(3): 48-60.
[56] DUNIFON R. The influence of grandparents on the lives of children and adolescents[J]. Child development perspectives, 1967, 26(2): 183-183.
[57] 党云皓. 农村留守儿童心理行为问题及相关因素的调查研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2010: 17.
[58] 宋璐, 冯雪. 隔代抚养: 以祖父母为视角的分析框架[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(1): 83-89.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Social Work and Management
Add：729 East Dongfeng RD., Guangzhou PRC.
Tel：020-37627489 Fax：020-37626653 Email：shgzygl@gdut.edu.cn
Supported:Beijing Magtech