SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 74-84,96.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Optimization Path Analysis on Collaborative Governance Under the Mechanism of the “Linkage of Five Elements in the Community”

BAI Yue   

  1. School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, China
  • Received:2024-09-18 Online:2025-09-15 Published:2025-09-15

Abstract: The mechanism of the “Linkage of Five Elements in the community” has been integrated into the development of social work stations, playing a crucial role in innovating grassroots social governance. This study investigates optimization pathways for collaborative governance within this framework through a case study approach grounded in collaborative governance theory, drawing on empirical data from social work station practices in Zhejiang Province, China. Research has found that the development of resources related to the “Linkage of Five Elements in the community” follows a structred pattern. The collaborative governance of the mechanism of “Five Elements Linkage” unfolds in three sequential phases: “forming governance concepts”, “constructing governance mechanisms”, and “improving governance effectiveness”. These phases are characterized by platform-based integration, localized adaptation, and professionalization, with vertical-horizontal synergies facilitating multi-agent coordination. However, challenges persist, including tensions between service objectives and implementation processes, inadequate resource mobilization and inter-agent collaboration, limited capacity for sustainable synergy, and insufficient professionalization. To address these issues, the study proposes optimization strategies that emphasize motivational alignment, endogenous capacity-building, and institutional restructuring. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity of leveraging the Party-government leadership to empower stakeholders, foster consensus-driven goals, and catalyze collective action. Ultimately, this framework aims to enhance service quality and activate community endogenous vitality, offering both theoretical and practical insights for refining collaborative governance models in grassroots social innovation contexts.

Key words: Five-Society Linkage, social work stations, collaborative governance, mechanism optimization

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 中共中央国务院关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见[EB/OL]. (2021-07-11). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/11/content_5624201.htm.
[2] 王思斌. 乡镇社工站建设中的“政策共同体”[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(16): 7.
[3] 任文启, 顾东辉. 基层治理专业化视野下社会工作站建设的进程、困境与实践策略[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022(6): 50-59.
[4] 许宝君, 陈伟东. “三社联动”到“五社联动”的转换逻辑及实现路径[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2023(9): 80-88,159.
[5] 任敏, 胡鹏辉, 郑先令. “五社联动”的背景、内涵及优势探析[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(3): 15-17.
[6] 王思斌. 积极建设乡镇社工站, 促进基层治理现代化[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(22): 7.
[7] 民政部办公厅. 关于加快乡镇(街道)社工站建设的通知[EB/OL]. [2024-07-11]. https://xxgk.mca.gov.cn:8445/gdnps/pc/content.jsp?mtype=7&id=116795.
[8] 徐东涛, 汪真诚. 常规扎根与动态回应: 外包式社工站参与基层治理的多重逻辑与运作机制[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2023(7): 69-80,158.
[9] 徐盈艳. 协同整合: 乡镇(街道)社工站的角色与功能探索[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(3): 12-25.
[10] 程书松, 方曙光. 资产为本视角下社工站参与基层治理现代化建设的实践进路[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2023(4): 78-86.
[11] 徐家良, 成丽姣. “服务激活社会”——五社联动驱动社会建设的运行模式[J]. 治理研究, 2023(2): 33-45,157-158.
[12] 吴高辉, 文宇. 卷联式培育: 党建引领乡村共治的创新路径及其发生逻辑——基于“五社联动”的多案例研究[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2023(4): 55-68,126.
[13] 湖北创新“五社联动”机制提升社区治理效能. [EB/OL]. [2024-07-11]. https://www.mca.gov.cn/n152/n166/c46326/content.html.
[14] 徐选国. 从体制创新到生态建构: “五社联动”对“三社联动”的传承与超越[J]. 社会科学战线, 2024(8): 241-250.
[15] 王玥, 毛佳欣. “时间银行”互助养老模式实现路径——以“五社联动”社区创新治理为背景[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(2): 75-83.
[16] 顾永红, 刘宇. 行政吸纳服务: 双重委托代理困境下政府购买养老服务策略研究——基于武汉市“五社联动”经验[J]. 社会保障研究, 2022(2): 10-18.
[17] 胡鹏辉, 任敏, 严艺文. 重建熟悉关系: “五社联动”中专业社工参与乡村治理何以可为——基于Q县H村项目实践案例的探究[J]. 学习与实践, 2023(5): 112-120.
[18] 牛犁耘, 秦永超. 服务治理与支持建构: “五社联动”中社会工作行动的困境与突围[J]. 学习论坛, 2023(4): 94-100.
[19] 张晨, 王霏. 社会组织如何助力“五社联动”破解动迁社区治理困境?——来自S市G区B社区的个案[J]. 新视野, 2023(5): 48-55.
[20] 刘蕾, 李德艳. 项目化共生: 社区“五社联动”治理模式优化研究——以江苏苏州创新实践为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(5): 1-18.
[21] 吕方. 以社区能力为中心的城乡社区治理体系现代化——“五社联动”的实践形态及其知识意义[J]. 济南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(3): 105-114.
[22] 卢瑾, 郭光玉. 建构社区治理共同体的多重逻辑与实现路径——基于昆明市C社区“五社联动”分析[J]. 中共天津市委党校学报, 2024(4): 87-95.
[23] DONAHUE J. On collaborative governance [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004: 464-467.
[24] ANSELL C. Gash a collaborative governance in theory and practice[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2008, 18(4): 543-571.
[25] WALTER U M, PETR C G. A template for family-centered interagency collaboration[J]. Families in society the journal of contemporary human services, 2000, 81(5): 494-503.
[26] PADIILA Y, DAIGLE L. Inter-agency collaboration in an international setting[J]. Administration in social work, 1998, 22(1): 65-81.
[27] EMERSON K, NABATCHI T, BALOGH S, et al. An integrative framework for collaborative governance[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2012, 22(1): 1-29.
[28] SABATIER P A , WEIBLE C , FICKER J . Eras of water management in the United States: implications for collaborative watershed approaches[J]. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management, 2005, 1(1): 23-52.
[29] MARGERUM R D , WHITALL D . The challenges and implications of collaborative management on a river basin scale[J]. Journal of environmental planning & management, 2004, 47(3): 409-429.
[30] THOMSON A M, PERRY J L. Collaboration processes: inside the black box[J]. Public administration review, 2006, 66(s1): 20-32.
[31] 魏娜, 郭彬彬, 张乾瑾. 协同治理视角下基金会开展儿童医疗救助研究——基于Z基金会J项目的案例分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(3): 38-43.
[32] 闫亭豫. 国外协同治理研究及对我国的启示[J]. 江西社会科学, 2015(7): 244-250.
[33] 欧黎明, 朱秦. 社会协同治理: 信任关系与平台建设[J]. 中国行政管理, 2009(5): 118-121.
[34] 杨志军. 多中心协同治理模式研究: 基于三项内容的考察[J]. 中共南京市委党校学报, 2010(3): 42-49.
[35] 杨清华. 协同治理与公民参与的逻辑同构与实现理路[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(2): 46-50,70.
[36] 文军, 陈雪婧. 社区协同治理中的转译实践: 模式、困境及其超越——基于行动者网络理论的分析[J]. 社会科学, 2023(1): 141-152.
[37] 李振锋, 王翔君. 老旧小区改造中协同治理的模式比较研究——基于对北京市3个治理案例的考察[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2023(10): 46-60.
[38] 何雪松, 崔晋宁. 情境合法性、协同治理与项目成效: 社会组织参与社区治理的案例比较研究[J]. 学术研究, 2024(7): 79-86,2,193.
[39] 刘黎红, 冯碧莹. 社区儿童福利的协同治理与服务递送——以民国时期的儿童福利站为例[J]. 青年研究, 2022(4): 35-44,95.
[40] 任慧颖. 应急志愿服务的多主体—全过程联动研究——基于公共危机协同治理理论的视角[J]. 理论学刊, 2022(1): 152-160.
[41] 阚道远, 杨宁. 区域党建一体化驱动跨域协同治理: 作用机制与实践框架——基于长三角一体化实践的研究, 2024(3): 127-141,160.
[42] 徐梦周, 朱永竹, 杨大鹏. 数字经济发展的空间关联与协同治理: 以长三角城市群为例[J]. 治理研究, 2022(5): 102-112,128.
[43] 湖北省民政厅课题组, 孟志强. “五社联动”助推基层治理体系和治理能力现代化[J]. 中国民政, 2021(17): 37-40.
[44] BENTRUP G. Evaluation of a collaborative mode: a case study analysis of watershed planning in the intermountain west[J]. Environmental management, 2001, 27: 739-748.
[45] 汪阔林. “五社联动”中的共建共治密码[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(10): 25.
[46] 杨乐, 邓亚情, 李艳荣. 奏响社区治理协奏曲——湖北省武汉市汉阳区琴断口街七里一村社区的“五社联动”探索[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(3): 17-18.
[47] 田培杰. 协同治理概念考辨[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(1): 124-140.
[48] 徐玉特. 制度分析视角下政府协同治理困境及其优化路径探析[J]. 领导科学, 2023(4): 97-101.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!