SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 91-99.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study on the Patterns and Types of Resident Participation in Co-Production Within Micro-Infrastructure Development

WANG Lu   

  1. Management Department, Taiyuan University,Taiyuan,Shanxi,030012,China
  • Received:2024-07-03 Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-15

Abstract: Micro-infrastructure development, as a collaborative production process involving multiple stakeholders to improve community environments based on shared needs, represents an innovative pathway for governments to encourage resident participation and raise public awareness. However, insufficient attention is paid to micro-infrastructure development. This paper introduces the theory of co-production, following the logical sequence of “influencing factors-initial behavior-sustained behavior-production outcomes”, to analyze resident participation in the micro-infrastructure process. It constructs a corresponding behavioral model encompassing three levels: the production process, the behavioral process, and the cognitive process, and categorizes the types based on two dimensions: participation methods and micro-infrastructure attributes. Ultimately, the study suggests that governments should transform their roles, adopt differentiated management approaches, and actively integrate strategies such as technological innovation and emotional engagement to promote resident participation in the co-production of micro-infrastructure through scientific and effective intervention and guidance.

Key words: co-production, micro-infrastructure, resident participation, community governance, community commons

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 中共中央 国务院关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见[EB/OL]. (2021-07-11). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/11/content_5624201.htm.
[2] 廖天虎. 我国共建共治共享社会治理制度的完善及拓展[J]. 人民论坛, 2024(19): 59-61.
[3] 陈友华, 佴莉. 社区共同体困境与社区精神重塑[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2016(4): 54-63,189.
[4] 袁方成. 增能居民: 社区参与的主体性逻辑与行动路径[J]. 行政论坛, 2019(1): 80-85.
[5] 吴月. “共同生产”如何达成——基于城市社区公共服务的实证研究[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(5): 31-42,205.
[6] 陆海燕. 超越参与: 公共服务中的共同生产[J]. 中共福建省委党校学报, 2019(4): 118-126.
[7] 吴金鹏. 公民共同生产行为: 文献评述、研究框架与未来展望[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2022(6): 156-168.
[8] 吴丹, 潘权骁. 社区微更新何以走向共同生产: 政府动员策略的四重调适[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2024(6): 174-184.
[9] 刘淑妍, 吕俊延. 城市治理新动能: 以“微基建”促进社区共同体的成长[J]. 社会科学, 2021(3): 3-14.
[10] 王欢明. “草根”驱动的公共服务合作生产及其机制——基于S市Y街道微基建PPP改造的案例分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(4): 27-35.
[11] 葛天任, 王拓涵. 社区更新微基建的公平规划与合作治理——以北京“清河实验”的YG社区为例[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5): 27-36.
[12] 诸大建. 微基建与城市可持续发展[J]. 可持续发展经济导刊, 2020(8): 22-23.
[13] 陈飞, 梁同同, 程天, 等. 基于供需匹配的城市旧住区微基建理论内涵及实践案例研究[J]. 现代城市研究, 2023(12): 86-93.
[14] 魏秦, 康艺兰, 常琛. 艺术针灸·社区赋能: 黄浦区南昌路街道微基建更新实践[J]. 公共艺术, 2022(2): 98-107.
[15] ALFORD J. Defining the client in the public sector: a social-exchange perspective[J]. Public administration review, 2002, 62(3): 337-346.
[16] PARKS R B , BAKER P C, KISER L, et al. Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations[J]. Policy studies journal, 2010, 9(7): 1001-1011.
[17] OSTROM E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development[J]. World development, 1996, 24(6): 1073-1087.
[18] PERCY L S. Conceptualizing and measuring citizen co-production of community safety[J]. Policy studies journal, 2005, 7(S1): 486-493.
[19] NABATCHI T, SANCINO A, SICILIA M. Varieties of participation in public services: the who, when, and what of coproduction[J]. Public administration review, 2017, 77(5): 766-776.
[20] 张绪娥. 我国社区更新的合作生产模式及其机制研究[D]. 北京: 中央财经大学, 2023: 85-87.
[21] 充分运用“共同缔造”理念 推进老旧小区改造[J]. 住宅科技, 2017(12): 9.
[22] 定明捷, 曾祯. 复杂适应系统视角下的社区公共服务价值共创: 一个分析框架[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2021(6): 124-138.
[23] 容志, 张云翔. 社区微更新中政社共同生产的类型与生成逻辑——基于上海市Y社区的实践案例分析[J]. 探索, 2020(3): 127-141.
[24] 刘炳胜, 张发栋, 薛斌. 由内而外的城市社区更新何以可能?——以X社区更新治理为例[J]. 公共管理学报, 2022(1): 121-133,174.
[25] 王承慧. 走向善治的社区微更新机制[J]. 规划师, 2018(2): 5-10.
[26] PARRADO S , RYZIN V G G , BOVAIRD T , et al. Correlates of co-production: evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens[J]. International public management journal, 2013, 16(1): 85-112.
[27] ROSENTRAUB M S, SHARP E B. Consumers as producers of social services: coproduction and the level of social services[J]. Southern review of public administration, 1981, 4(4): 502-539.
[28] 苏曦凌. 公共服务的空间叙事: 可及性、可及化与可及度[J]. 社会科学, 2022(9): 112-120.
[29] 容志, 张云翔. 从专业生产到共同生产: 城市社区公共服务供给的范式转型[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2020(6): 91-101,127-128.
[30] 颜玉凡, 叶南客. 认同与参与——城市居民的社区公共文化生活逻辑研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2019(2): 147-170,245.
[31] 彼得·蒂森, 沃特·范·多伦, 王冬芳, 等. 你是谁/住在哪里: 居住小区的特征能解释合作生产吗?[J]. 国际行政科学评论(中文版), 2016(1): 86-107.
[32] PESTOFF V. Collective action and the sustainability of co-production[J]. Public management review, 2014, 16(3): 383-401.
[33] OSBORNE S P, RADNOR Z, STROKOSCH K. Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment[J]. Public management review, 2016, 18(5): 639-653.
[34] ARNSTEIN S. A ladder of citizen participation[J]. Journal of the American planning association, 1969, 85: 24-34.
[35] OSBORNE S P, STROKOSCH K. It takes two to tango? understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives[J]. British journal of management, 2013, 24(S1): S31-S47.
[36] 吴金鹏. 公共服务共同生产的过程机制与创新策略——以公共图书馆服务为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022(9): 92-100.
[37] 侯俊东, 栾雅慧. 社区志愿服务共同生产: 内涵逻辑及过程机理[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2024(1): 1-10.
[38] 王德福. 治城: 中国城市及社区治理探微[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2021: 182-203.
[39] 高飞. 梯度情感动员的双重过程: 社会治理共同体构建中的递进逻辑[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(4): 55-62.
[1] SHI Tianqi, DAI Yi. Professional Dilemmas and Coping Strategies of Community Workers from the Perspective of Dual Institutional Logic [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(6): 32-41.
[2] CHEN Jing, LUO Qin. Subjectivity Deficiency and Reconstruction of Social Work Agencies in Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 68-78,88.
[3] ZHANG Yuguang, HAN Yaojun. The Exploration of Digital Technology Empowering Urban Community Intelligent Governance: Based on the Case Analysis of Jiunanhai County Community in Guangzhou [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 85-93.
[4] HU Xiaojun. Construction of the Practice Model and Development Support System for Community Philanthropy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(6): 90-100.
[5] HOU Jundong, LUAN Yahui. Community Voluntary Service Co-Production: Connotation Logic and Process Mechanism [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 1-10.
[6] LI Xiao, WANG Wenjing, LIU Yueting, ZHENG Misi. Foundation-Practice-Principle: A Path of Competence Development for Community Workers in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(4): 53-64.
[7] LIN Chengyan, ZHUO Caiqin. Theoretical Options and Practice Integration of Social Work Participating in Community Governance: An Action Research of Community Service Based on Community Capacity Building Theory [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(6): 77-91.
[8] PAN Li, SUN Jie, WANG Yean. A Study on the Mechanism of Building Rural Community Resilience from Co-Production in Township Social Work Stations: Taking the “He Project” in Wangcheng District as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 75-85.
[9] TONG Min, ZHOU Xiaotong. Social Healing: A Hope-Implanted Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(5): 5-13.
[10] GUO Weihe. Study on the Relationship between State Governance and Community Governance and Modernization of Their Coordinated Evolution [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 5-15.
[11] YU Tieshan. Towards Effective Governance: Institutional Logic and Practical Strategy of Community Governance: A Case Study Based on S City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 62-67,97.
[12] TAN Xia, LIN Yigang. Research on the Path of International Community Governance from the Strength Perspective: Taking Chongqing Hongyan Community as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 68-72.
[13] XU Qin. The Double Variation of Legitimacy and Autonomy of Community Grassroots Organizations: Based on the Analysis of J Community C Fitness Team in Wuhan [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 73-80,104.
[14] Huang Haiping. Reconstruction of Confucian Cultural Capital in Urban Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(5): 61-66.
[15] LIU Zhen, ZHU Zhiwei. Objectives and Structure: Typological Analysis of Community Social Organizations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(2): 72-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!