SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 102-107.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Merge-based Derivation in Chomskyan Minimalism

WANG Heyu   

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China
  • Received:2018-04-02 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-15

Abstract: Merge-based derivation in Chomskyan minimalism assumes human language as a computational system, giving a reasonable and concise explanation of the recursion and hierarchy of language. There exist such different structure-building modes as External Merge, Internal Merge, Late Merge and Parallel Merge. External Merge represents the generally selectional relation between lexical items and Internal Merge proceeds under agree between probe and goal. Internal Merge is essentially copy plus remerge and explains the dislocation phenomenon of language. Late Merge and Parallel Merge, both involving operation work zone and parallel operations, explain how the time and order of different merges define the generated structure. There is no conceptual need to postulate both Set-Merge and Pair-Merge since a label is needed in order for the structure of either modes of merge to be properly interpreted at the interfaces. As to the relation between merge and label, a choice has to be made between (i) to explore how merge, without resorting to label, directly generates endocentric and recursive structures and (ii) to replace merge derivation by label syntax, explaining how label distinguishes human language from other communicational systems.

Key words: minimalism, merge, language computational system, label

CLC Number: 

  • HO
[1] CHOMSKY N. The minimalist program[M]. Cambridge Mass:The MIT Press, 1995.
[2] COLLINS C, STABLER E. A formalization of minimalist syntax[J]. Syntax, 2016, 19(1):43-78.
[3] CHOMSKY N. On phases[J]. Current studies in linguistics Series, 2008(45):133-166
[4] ADGER D. Core syntax[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2003.
[5] 宁春岩. 连续合并论[J]. 现代外语, 2010(2):111-120
[6] CHOMSKY N. Beyond explanatory adequacy[C]//ADRIANA B. Structures and beyond:the cartography of syntactic structures. New York:Oxford University Press, 2004:104-131.
[7] NUNES J, URIAGEREKA J. Cyclicity and extraction domai-ns[J]. Syntax, 2000, 3(1):20-43
[8] CHOMSKY N. Minimal recursion:exploring the prospects[C]//ROEPER T, SPEAS M. Recursion:complexity in cognition. Switzerland:Springer International Publishing, 2014:1-15.
[9] CITCO B. On the nature of merge:external merge, internal merge and parallel merge[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 2005, 36(4):475-496
[10] NUNES J. Sideward movement[J]. Linguistic inquiry, 2014, 32(2):303-344
[11] CHOMSKY N. Minimalist inquiries:the framework[C]//MARTIN R, et al. Step by step:essays on minimalist syntax in honor of howard lasnik. Cambridge Mass.:The MIT Press, 2000:89-155.
[12] JOHNSON K. The view of QR from ellipsis[C]//JOHNSON K. Topics in ellipsis. Cambridge:CUP, 2008:69-94.
[13] LANGENDOEN D T. Merge[C]//CARNIE A, et al. Formal approaches to function in grammar:in honor of eloise Jelinek. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2003:307-318.
[14] LEBEAUX D. Where does binding theory apply[M]. NJ:NEC Research Institute, 1998.
[15] ZWART J W. Prospects for top-down derivation[J]. Catalan journal of linguistics, 2009(8):161-187
[16] ZWART J W. Structure and order:asymmetric merge[C]//Boeckx C. Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism. Oxford:OUP, 2011:96-118.
[17] 宁春岩. 并集对称合并与序偶非对称合并[J]. 现代外语, 2013(3):221-229
[18] CHOMSKY N. Problems of projection[J]. Lingua, 2013, 130(18):33-49
[19] CITKO B. Missing labels[J]. Lingua, 2008(118):907-944
[20] ADGER D. A syntax of substance[M]. Cambridge Mass:The MIT Press, 2013.
[21] COLLINS C. Eliminating labels[C]//EPSTEIN S D, SEELY T D. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Oxford:Blackwell, 2002:42-64.
[22] EPSTEIN, et al. Labeling by minimal search:implications for successive-cyclic a-movement and the conception of the postulate "phase"[J]. Linguistic inquiry, 2014, 45(3):463-481
[23] NARITA H. Endocentric structuring of projection-free syntax[M]. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2014.
[24] SEELY T D. Merge, derivational c-command, and subcategorization in a label-free syntax[C]//BOECKX C. Minimalist essays. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2006:182-217.
[25] HORNSTEIN N, PETROSKI P. Basic operations:minimal syntax-semantics[J]. Catalan journal of linguistics, 2009(8):113-139
[26] HORNSTEIN N, NUNES J. Adjunction, labeling and bare phrase structure[J]. Biolinguistics, 2008(8):57-86
[1] ZHENG Guanghuai, MENG Xiangzhe, LIU Jie. Restoring Sociality: Key Issues of Social Work in Response to COVID-19 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(2): 5-14.
[2] LI Ling'ou. Hierarchical Governance and Organizational Legitimacy: The Dual Logic and Realization Methods for Social Organizations to Coordinate Response to Emergencies [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(6): 78-88.
[3] LIU Jinglin, ZHU Yakun. On the Advantages of Private Social Service Organizations in the Public Emergency Capability Construction——With Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 13(6): 57-62.
[4] SU Quan-You, LI Yi-Bo. The Late Qing Dynasty Governments Crisis Response to Braids Revolution [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 13(5): 49-54.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!