责信理论视角下社会工作机构绩效评估研究——以S市社会工作机构绩效评估为例

Abstract

Abstract: The performance evaluation of social work agency in China has made great achievements, but it also faces many dilemmas of accountability, such as tired agency, unprofessional evaluation, insufficient participation, and low credibility of the evaluation results. In order to get rid of these dilemmas, the value orientation should shift from passive inspection to organizational empowerment; evaluation system should be improved to build professional accountability from multiple perspectives; the legal accountability should be built by the rule of law; the public accountability should be improved through multi-agent participation to ensure that the performance evaluation can carry the public value of social work services.

Key words: social service accountability, social work agency, performance evaluation

CLC Number:

C916

XU Daowen, TANG Dating. A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Social Work Agency from the Perspective of Accountability: Based on the Performance Evaluation of Social Work Agency in S City[J].SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 28-36.

References

[1] 陈云凡, 王丹. 政府购买助残服务契约责信架构研究[J]. 社会工作, 2015(6): 3-11
[2] 官有垣, 陈锦棠, 陆宛苹. 第三部门评估与责信[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.
[3] 刘淑琼. 绩效、品质与消费者权益保障: 论社会服务契约委托的责信课题[J]. 社会政策与社会工作学刊, 2005(2): 34-39
[4] JOHNSTON J M, B S ROMZEK. Contracting and accountability in State Medicaid reform: Rhetoric, theories and reality[J]. Public administration review, 1999, 59(5): 383-399
[5] 尹阿雳, 赵环. 审核与增能: 社会工作服务机构评估模式的整合升级——基于深圳市社工服务机构评估(2009—2016年)的经验反思[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(1): 13-14
[6] 高丽, 徐选国. 政府购买社会服务第三方评估的合法性困境及其重构[J]. 社会建设, 2019(6): 43-52
[7] 刘旺洪, 徐梓文. 合法性理论及其意义——韦伯与哈贝马斯的比较[J]. 世界经济与政治论坛, 2017(6): 154-166
[8] 郝宇青. 论合法性理论之流变[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007(5): 67-74
[9] 何颖, 李思然. 新公共管理理论方法论评析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2014(11): 66-72
[10] 竺乾威. 从新公共管理到整体性治理[J]. 中国行政管理, 2008(10): 52-58
[11] 徐道稳. 中国社会工作行政化发展模式及其转型[J]. 社会科学, 2017(10): 90-97
[12] 杨雪冬. 压力型体制: 一个概念的简明史[J]. 社会科学, 2012(11): 4-12
[13] 赵环, 严骏夫, 徐选国. 政府购买社会服务的逻辑起点与第三方评估机制创新[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(3): 1-6, 22
[14] 姚进忠, 崔坤杰. 绩效抑或专业: 我国社会工作评估的困境与对策[J]. 中州学刊, 2015(1): 76-77
[15] 陈天祥. 政府绩效评估与管理: 政治、过程与技术[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2015: 39.
[16] 王锐兰. 解读非营利组织绩效评价: 基于民主政治视野的研究[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2009: 96.
[17] 姚进忠. 项目导向: 社会工作评估机制优化研究——基于厦门实践的调查与剖析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(5): 22-33
[18] 郁菁. 政府购买社会组织社会服务项目绩效评估模式研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(5): 126-132
[19] 史传林. 地方政府绩效评估指标体系变动的内在逻辑——基于深圳市政府绩效评估指标体系的动态分析[J]. 行政论坛, 2015(3): 45-50

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Social Work Agency from the Perspective of Accountability: Based on the Performance Evaluation of Social Work Agency in S City

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[2]	YU Tieshan. The Development Path of Social Work Agency from the Perspective of Competition Strategy: An Empirical Study Based on the Data of CGSS2010 and CLDS2014 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(1): 73-77.
[3]	MENG Ya-Nan. On Development of Social Organization in Modern Organizations System in China：A Case Study in BD City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 15(2): 53-63.