SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 60-68.
• SHEHUI GONGZUO • Previous Articles Next Articles
Intergenerational and Intragenerational Caregiving Differences from the Perspective of Social Development: Based on a Qualitative Study of Dementia Caregivers
LIU Haitao, GU Donghui
- School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
CLC Number:
- C916
| [1] 费孝通. 家庭结构变动中的老年赡养问题——再论中国家庭结构的变动[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社科科学版), 1983(3): 6-15 [2] 齐亚强, 牛建林. 家庭成就观的代际传承及其对青少年教育获得的影响[J]. 青年研究, 2021(6): 13-26,91 [3] JIA CHEN, LUCY P JORDAN. Intergenerational support and life satisfaction of young-, old-and oldest-old adults in China[J]. Aging & mental health, 2016, 22(3): 412-420 [4] KUO LM, HUANG HL, HSU WC, et al. Home-based caregiver training: benefits differ by care receivers’ dementia diagnosis[J]. Geriatric nursing, 2016, 37(5): 376-384 [5] 于大川, 朱丽君, 赵小仕. 失能老人的照护特征与照护效果研究[J]. 南方人口, 2022(3): 27-38 [6] 朱榕, 张莉, 李娟, 等. 老年痴呆家庭照护者照护能力现状及影响因素研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2019(1): 90-93 [7] 张亮. 中国儿童照顾政策研究: 基于性别、家庭和国家的视角[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016: 21. [8] CHUNG J C. An intergenerational reminiscence programme for older adults with early dementia and youth volunteers: values and challenges[J]. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2009, 23(2): 259-264 [9] YANG CHENG, JING XI, MARK W ROSENBERG, et al. Intergenerational differences in social support for the community-living elderly in Beijing, China[J]. Health science reports, 2018, 1(11): 1-10 [10] BARBARA D’AMEN, MARCO SOCCI, SARA SANTINI. Intergenerational caring: a systematic literature review on young and young adult caregivers of older people[J]. BMC Geriatrics, 2021, 21(1): 1-17 [11] 米奇利. 社会发展: 社会福利视角下的发展观[M]. 苗正民, 译. 上海: 格致出版社、上海人民出版社, 2009. [12] 庞元正, 丁冬红. 当代西方社会发展理论新词典[M]. 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 2001: 8. [13] MICHAEL WOOLCOCK, DEEPA NARAYA. Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy[J]. The World Bank research observe, 2000, 2(15): 225-249 [14] JAMES MIDGLEY. Social development: theory & practice[M]. Longdon: SAGE Publications, 2014. [15] 赵建国, 邵思齐. 日本福利社会发展理论的实践应用及启示[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(3): 85-92 [16] 郭林, 谌基东. 中国老年照护的嬗变、逻辑与制度完善[J]. 学术研究, 2021(7): 85-90,188 [17] 桂世勋. 合理调整养老机构的功能结构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2001(4): 97-101,127 [18] 杨建军, 汤婧婕, 汤燕. 基于“持续照顾”理念的养老模式和养老设施规划[J]. 城市规划, 2012(5): 20-26,65 [19] 姜洪庆, 孙雅娟. 基于持续健康照顾理念的养老社区规划研究[J]. 南方建筑, 2015(6): 90-94 [20] 雷静雯. 认知症长期照料设施生活空间设计研究——基于日常活动视角[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2019: 24. [21] WANG J, CAO Y, WU B, et al. Perceived empowerment, social support and quality of life among Chinese elderly residents in long-term care facilities[J]. Journal of aging and health, 2018, 5(2): 178-183 [22] S MORGAN, LH YODER. A concept analysis of person-centered care[J]. Journal of holistic nursing, 2012, 30(1): 6-15 [23] 赵雅欣, 钟清玲, 吴蓓. 中美老年痴呆患者养老或长期照护研究现状与前景分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2022(5): 1266-1270 [24] 程瑜, 陈思然. 共疫与熔补: 以“人”为中心的慢性病社区照护理念探析[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(6): 79-87 [25] 王振涛, 姜依辰, 吴巍. HAPPY照护模型助力认知症社区居家照护质量提升[J]. 质量与认证, 2020(2): 52-53 [26] 汪凤炎, 郑红. 中国文化心理学[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2013: 255-256. [27] 甘绍平. 代际义务的论证问题[J]. 中国社会科学, 2019(1): 22-41,204-205 [28] 许琪, 王金水. 代际互惠对中国老年人生活满意度的影响[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(1): 104-115,145 [29] 穆光宗. 家庭养老制度的传统与变革: 基于东亚和东南亚地区的一项比较研究[M]. 北京: 华龄出版社, 2002: 212. [30] 王跃生. 中国家庭代际关系的维系、变动和趋向[J]. 江淮论坛, 2011(2): 122-129 [31] 李猛. 韦伯: 法律与价值[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2001: 243-245. [32] 龙玉其. 孝道与生计: 农村失能老人子女照护需求、 照护冲突与调适[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(3): 71-81 [33] 路易斯·亨利·摩尔根. 古代社会[M]. 杨东莼, 马雍, 马巨, 译. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2007: 278-279. [34] SHELLEY E CANNING, DARREN BLAKEBOROUGH. Intergenerational dance in long-term residential care: social citizenship in dementia care[J]. BC studies, 2019, 202(8): 167-178 [35] CHRISTOPHER R WARD, LENORE LOS KAMP, SALLY NEWMAN. The effects of participation in an intergenerational program on the behavior of residents with dementia[J]. Activities, adaptation & aging, 1996, 20(4): 61-76 [36] KLAUS HABERKERN, TINA SCHMID, MARC SZYDLIK. Gender differences in intergenerational care in European welfare states[J]. Ageing and society, 2015, 35(2): 298-320 [37] TRATTNER WALTER I. From poor law to welfare state: a history of social welfare in America[M]. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press, 1994: xxxii. [38] 考斯塔·艾斯平-安德森. 福利资本主义的三个世界[M]. 郑秉文, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 22. [39] TITMUSS R M. Commitment to welfare[M]. London: Allen & Unwin, 1928: 128. [40] MARY DALY. Care as a good for social policy[J]. Journal of social policy, 2002, 31(4): 251-270 [41] ANTTONEN A, SIPILA, J. European social care services: is it possible to identify models?[J]. Journal of European social policy, 1996, 6(2): 87-100 [42] 理查德·蒂特马斯. 蒂特马斯社会政策十讲[M]. 江绍康, 译. 长春: 吉林出版集团, 2011: 32. [43] PEARL A DYKSTRA. Cross-national differences in intergenerational family relations: the influence of public policy arrangements[J]. Innovation in aging, 2018, 1(2): 1-8 [44] 莫妮卡·亨宁克, 英格·哈特, 阿杰·贝利. 质性研究方法[M]. 王丽娟, 徐梦洁, 胡豹, 译. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2015: 95-96. [45] 罗红光. “家庭福利”文化与中国福利制度建设[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(3): 145-161,244 [46] 刘海桃. 整合式照护: 基于认知症照护者的经验研究[J]. 社会工作, 2022(2): 1-12,104-105 [47] 杜鹏, 高云霞, 谢立黎. 中国老年照护服务: 概念框架与发展路径[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2022(9): 1-10 [48] 唐钧. 老年照护体系的整体效应[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2022(4): 94-104 [49] ELISA-MARIE BEHRNDT, MELANIE STRAUBMEIER, HILDEGARD SEIDL, et al. The German day-care study: multicomponent nondrug therapy for people with cognitive impairment in day-care centres supplemented with caregiver counselling (DeTaMAKS)–study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial[J]. BMC health services research, 2017, 17(7): 1-16 [50] 安东尼·哈尔, 詹姆斯·梅志里. 发展型社会政策[M]. 罗敏, 范酉庆, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2006: 5-6. [51] FRANCESCO MIELE, FEDERICO NERESINI, GIOVANNI BONIOLO, et al. Supportive care for older people with dementia: socio-organizational implications[J]. Ageing & society, 2022, 42(2): 376-408 [52] MILTE R, RATCLIFFE J, BRADLEY C, et al. Evaluating the quality of care received in long-term care facilities from a consumer perspective: development and construct validity of the Consumer Choice Index–Six Dimension instrument[J]. Ageing & society, 2019, 39(1): 138-160 |
| [1] | LUAN Wenjing, HUA Ruoxin, CHEN Jing. The Concept of Day Care for the Elderly: Clarification and Revealation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(2): 29-35. |
|
||