SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 69-77.

• SHEHUI GUANLI • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Will More Public Interest Property Promote Information Disclosure in Social Organizations? Chain Intermediary of Council Governance and Internal System Building

ZHANG Tianzhen, FEI Meiping   

  1. School of Social and Behavioral Science, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China
  • Received:2022-11-07 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-09-14

Abstract: Information disclosure is the key for social organizations to gain social trust. As an important resource to sustain the survival and development of organizations, the acquisition of public interest property is accompanied by the transfer of power and obligation, and has an impact on the information disclosure of social organizations. Based on the survey data of CSWLS2019, this paper empirically examines the impact of public interest property on information disclosure of social organizations and its mechanism of action, using 731 social organizations as research samples. It is found that the public interest property can play a role in promoting information disclosure without the multi-layer accountability mechanism, and the public interest property can enhance the information disclosure level of social organizations through the chain intermediary role of council governance and internal system construction. The government is a strong principal in the public interest market, and the greater the proportion of government funds in public interest assets, the higher the degree of information disclosure of social organizations. The findings of this study have some implications for improving the accountability mechanism of public welfare property.

Key words: social organizations, public welfare property, information disclosure, council governance, organizational system

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 王名, 贾西津. 试论基金会的产权与治理结构[J]. 公共管理评论, 2004(1):115-125
[2] 全国科学技术名词审定委员会. 管理科学技术名词[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2016:742-765.
[3] 孟志强, 彭建梅, 刘佑平. 2011年度中国慈善捐助报告[M]. 北京:中国社会出版社, 2012:45.
[4] PENG S, KIM M, DEAT F. The effects of nonprofit reputation on charitable giving:a survey experiment[J]. International journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations, 2019, 30(5):811-827
[5] 中华人民共和国慈善法[EB/OL].[2016-03-21]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c29334/201603/26ffa0ac610d4e3c93f7a6d3413eb3bf.shtml.
[6] 邵贞棋, 赵西卜. 社会组织信息披露的框架体系研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(9):91-96
[7] SAXTON G D, ZHUANG J. A game-theoretic model of disclosure-donation interactions in the market for charitable contributions[J]. Journal of applied communication research, 2013, 41(1):40-63
[8] 程博. 官方微博与非营利组织信息披露质量:自媒体真的有治理效应吗?[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2019(7):52-67
[9] 颜梦洁, 李青. 政治关联与非营利组织透明度:自媒体监督的调节效应[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2021(2):129-141
[10] BEHN R D. Rethinking democratic accountability[M]. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press, 2001:255-270.
[11] SAXTON G D, GUO C. Accountability online:understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations[J]. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 2011, 40(2):270-295
[12] 范锰杰. 我国个人公益捐赠所得税政策解析[J]. 财会月刊, 2020(23):151-155
[13] BEHN B K, DEVRIES D, LIN J. Voluntary disclosure in nonprofit organizations:an exploratory study[J]. Advances in accounting incorporating advances in international accounting, 2010, 26(1):6-12
[14] 王名, 刘求实. 中国非政府组织发展的制度分析[J]. 中国非营利评论, 2007(1):92-145
[15] 颜克高, 陈晓春. 非营利组织信息披露机制的理论构建[J]. 华东经济管理, 2010(12):122-125
[16] SAXTON G D, KUO J S, HO Y C. The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by nonprofit organizations[J]. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 2012, 41(6):1051-1071
[17] 刘丽珑, 李建发. 非营利组织信息透明度改进研究——基于全国性基金会的经验证据[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015(6):91-101
[18] ERHARDT N L, WERBEL J D, SHRADER C B. Board of director diversity and firm financial performance[J]. Corporate governance an international review, 2003, 11(2):102-111
[19] 罗斯 L 瓦茨, 杰罗尔德 L 齐默尔曼, 等. 实证会计理论[M]. 陈少华, 等, 译. 大连:东北财经大学出版社, 2006:35-38.
[20] KRISHNAN R, YETMAN M H, YETMAN R J. Expense misreporting in nonprofit organizations[J]. Accounting review, 2006, 81(2):399-420
[21] 丁惠平. 市场化、全球化与网络化——当代中国社会组织变迁的影响机制及内在逻辑[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2017(6):183-191, 208
[22] GILL M, FLYNN R J, REISSING E. The governance self-assessment checklist:an instrument for assessing board effectiveness[J]. Nonprofit management and leadership, 2005, 15(3):271-294
[23] 王菲. 我国非营利组织"公益产权"研究[J]. 山东行政学院学报, 2012(4):40-42
[24] 丁惠平. 限制、准入与共治:中国社会组织治理的演变历程与未来走向[J]. 学习与探索, 2022(10):30-38, 190
[25] VERBRUGGEN S, CHRISTIAENS J, MILIS K. Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations' compliance with reporting standards?[J]. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 2011, 40(1):5-32
[26] TINKELMAN D. Differences in sensitivity of financial statement users to joint cost allocations:the case of nonprofit organizations[J]. Journal of accounting, auditing & finance, 1998, 13(4):377-393
[27] 刘畅, 袁易卿, 孙中伟, 等. 中国社会工作动态调查(CSWLS2019):设计、实施与样本描述[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(1):1-32
[28] BROWN W A. Board development practices and competent board members:implications for performance[J]. Nonprofit management and leadership, 2007, 17(3):301-317
[29] GORDON T, FISCHER M, MALONE D, et al. A comparative empirical examination of extent of disclosure by private and public colleges and universities in the United States[J]. Journal of accounting and public policy, 2003, 21(3):235-275
[30] HAYES A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:a regression-based approach[M]. New York:Guilford Press, 2013:335-337.
[31] 郭景萍. 社会工作机构的运作与管理[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2015:148-149.
[32] 北京师范大学中国慈善事业研究中心. 2001-2011中国慈善发展指数报告[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2012:17.
[33] 汪华. 新自由主义全球化、弹性积累与福利国家体制适应性困境[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020(4):40-47
[34] 来庆立. 终结还是异变——新自由主义现状与前景辨析[J]. 当代世界与社会主义, 2022(1):97-105
[35] BLYTH E. The professionalization of social work in England[J]. China journal of social work, 2009, 2(2):131-141
[1] LI Qiaoming, Zhou Ziyue. Adaptable Compatibility as the Transformation Action Strategies & Logic of Civil Supportive Social Organizations: Based on Field Work of X Organization in G City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(3): 80-91.
[2] FANG Ying. Research on the Development of Social Organization from the Perspective of Social Innovation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(2): 30-36,73.
[3] ZHU Hao, XU Shuhong. The Dilemma and Mechanism Innovation of Social Organizations Participating in the Supply of Children’s Welfare Services: A Case Study of Shanghai [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 70-78.
[4] CHEN Jing. External and Internal Forces: Analysis of Access to Opportunities for Social Organizations to Participate in Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(1): 69-77.
[5] ZHUO Caiqin, ZHANG Xuehui, ZHANG Qianxin. The Path of Social Organizations for the Disabled to Participate in Social Governance: A Case Study Based on Guangdong Association of the Blind [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 50-60.
[6] FANG Ying. Cooperation with Boundary: The New Relationship between Social Work Organization, the Subdistrict Office and the Neighborhood Committee [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(4): 58-68.
[7] GU Jiang-xia. Exploring the Forming Process of “Community, Social Organizations and Social Workers” Joint Action Mechanism in Urban Community: Based on the Experience of a Pilot Plan in S City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 86-92.
[8] LAI Shuai. The Innovative Development Path of Community-Social Organization-Social Worker Combined Interaction in Tibetan Urban Communities [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 69-74.
[9] 吕Qing , ZHANG Shu-Fang. An Investigation into Social Organizations’ Ability Development from the Perspective of Ability Enhancement—— With “Jiangyin Youth Love Harbor” in Jiangsu as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 14(1): 52-56.
[10] TANG Genghua, LONG Ruhui, HUANG Cuishan. Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure of Typical Corporations in the Pearl River Delta and Their  Social Responsibility Preferences [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 12(2): 39-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!