SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 70-78.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mechanism of the Five Elements Linkage in the Primary-Level Governance: Operation Mechanism, Governance Limits and Optimization Paths

QIU Guoliang1,2, LI Jing1, WANG Songyang1   

  1. 1. Shantou University School of Law, Shantou, Guangdong, 515063, China;
    2. Shantou University Research Center for Rural Revitalization, Shantou, Guangdong, 515063, China
  • Received:2023-06-23 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-15

Abstract: In the practice of primary-level governance, experiences such as the organizational framework of party structure embedded in the community, the mobilization of endogenous forces in the community, and the external supply of social charity resources have been formed. However, due to factors such as the path dependence of omnipotent governance, the effectiveness of the Linkage of Five Elements has not been fully utilized. Therefore, it is urgent to promote the improvement of the primary-level governance mechanism of the Linkage of Five Elements from the aspects of government hierarchy system, social voluntary participation, community consultation platform, and residents’ subjective awareness.

Key words: primary-level governance, the five elements linkage in the community, governance limits, optimize the path, diversified synergy

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 中共中央, 国务院. 关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见[N]. 光明日报, 2021-04-28.
[2] 习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会 夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[J]. 前线, 2017(11): 4-28
[3] 张健, 陈轶喆, 吴曼曼. 合肥探索基层社会治理创新的“五社联动”模式[J]. 中国社会组织, 2017(7): 27-30
[4] 中共中央. 关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度、推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定[EB/OL]. (2019-11-05). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-11/05/content_5449023.htm.
[5] 曹海军. 党建引领下的社区治理和服务创新[J]. 政治学研究, 2018(1): 95-98
[6] 徐家良, 成丽姣. “服务激活社会”——五社联动驱动社会建设的运行模式[J]. 治理研究, 2023(2): 33-45,157-158
[7] 刘厚金. 基层党建引领社区治理的作用机制——以集体行动的逻辑为分析框架[J]. 社会科学, 2020(6): 32-45
[8] 叶本乾, 万芹. 新时代党建引领城市社区治理的逻辑契合和路径选择[J]. 党政研究, 2018(6): 39-45
[9] BOURDIEU P. The forms of capital[M]// RICHARDSON J G. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, CT: Greenwood Press, 1986: 241-258.
[10] PUTNAM R D. The prosperous community: social capital and public life[J]. The American prospect, 1993, 13(4): 35-42
[11] 罗伯特 D 帕特南. 使民主运转起来[M]. 王列, 赖海榕, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015: 207-217.
[12] 郝宇青. 加强基层组织建设的政治逻辑[J]. 行政论坛, 2018(1): 16-22
[13] 安东尼·吉登斯. 社会学[M]. 4版. 赵旭东, 齐心, 王兵, 等, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2003: 16.
[14] 埃米尔·涂尔干. 社会分工论[M]. 渠敬东, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2017: 1-20.
[15] 王德福. 业主自治中的消极分子及其约束机制[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(3): 17-23,159
[16] 马克斯·韦伯. 经济与社会[M]. 林荣远, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2006: 278-324.
[17] 安东尼·唐斯. 官僚制内幕[M]. 郭小聪, 李学, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2017: 75-90.
[18] 张静. 基层政权: 乡村制度诸问题[M]. 3版. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019: 29-32.
[19] 张文显. “三治融合”之理[J]. 治理研究, 2020(6): 5-8,2
[20] 胡鹏辉, 任敏, 严艺文. 重建熟悉关系: “五社联动”中专业社工参与乡村治理何以可为——基于Q县H村项目实践案例的探究[J]. 学习与实践, 2023(5): 112-120
[21] 孙辉. 当前基层治理中存在的问题及其因应之道[J]. 党政论坛, 2020(4): 27-30
[22] 唐皇凤, 汪燕. 新时代自治、法治、德治相结合的乡村治理模式: 生成逻辑与优化路径[J]. 河南社会科学, 2020(6): 63-71
[23] 原珂, 赵建玲. “五社”联动助力基层社会治理共同体建设[J]. 河南社会科学, 2022(4): 75-82
[1] HOU Jundong, LUAN Yahui. Community Voluntary Service Co-Production: Connotation Logic and Process Mechanism [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 1-10.
[2] LI Min, LUO Huyi, BAO Hailin. Changes of Family Reproduction and Relationships: The New Implication of Women’s Outwork [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 20-27.
[3] WANG Huijuan. On the Four Approaches to Understand Assets-Based Community Development Models [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 28-35.
[4] WANG Luping, SUN Kuili. Review and Prospect of the Research about Integration and Development of Charity and Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 36-44.
[5] LIU Yong. Research on Public Trust Repair on Charities under Trust Violation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 45-52.
[6] LIU Yanxia, ZHA Yuan. Practical Dilemmas and Breakthrough Strategies of School Social Work in the Less Developed Western Region [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 53-60.
[7] HE Zhijing, WANG Zhizhong, CHANG Biru. Discussion on Career Choice Mechanism of Social Work Undergraduate Students from the Perspective of Social Cognitive Career Theory [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 61-69.
[8] WU Yanhua, ZHANG Zhihua. Flexible Governance of International Community Driven by Social and Cultural Space Governance: Based on the Case of Q Community in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 79-89.
[9] XING Xifeng. Historical Evolution and Path Dependence of China’s Social Policy: Analysis Based on Historical Institutionalism [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24(1): 90-98.
[10] PENG Xiaobing, WANG Ruohan. Obstructed Expression of Farmers’ Interests and Guiding the Return of Rural Values: The Dilemma of Rural Governance and the Path of Social Work Intervention in Rural Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(6): 5-13.
[11] WANG Jie, ZHANG Shaoqing. Constructing Rural Governance Community, What Can Social Work Do? A Case Study of Village L in Fujian Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(6): 14-22.
[12] ZHANG Fufu. Social Work Helps Rural Revitalization: Functional Orientation, Realistic Dilemma and Practical Strategies [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(6): 23-33.
[13] MENG Yi, HU Yang, MA Huanhuan. A Systematic Evaluation of the Factors Influencing Occupational Burnout of Social Workers [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(6): 34-45.
[14] WU Jiahui, MIAO Chunfeng. A Study on Group Interventions to Enhance the Sense of Hope of Rural Left-Behind Children: Based on the Practice of Village D in Yingtan City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(6): 46-58.
[15] TANG Yong, YE Fuyi, NI Xiaoqi. Grief Healing: A Grief Counseling Group-Based Intervention for Bereaved College Students Grieving the Death of a Loved One [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(6): 59-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!