SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 50-60,100.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

How Can Social Service Outsourcing Be Effective Entering the Countryside? A Case Study From the Perspective of Cooperative Production

WANG Wei, WU Xiaolong, HUANG Xingchen   

  1. College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211106,China
  • Received:2024-06-07 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-15

Abstract: In the context of comprehensive rural revitalization, the effective provision of public services in rural areas has become an important governance challenge. Government contracting and outsourcing, as a method to achieve “state-society” partnership, exhibit distinct administrative characteristics in their implementation. However, they also face challenges regarding weak autonomy, narrow coverage and disruptions in continuity. Adopting the perspective of cooperative production, this paper conducts extensive theoretical analysis and case review of the “Qiao Sao” project in S rural community, N city based on an analytical framework of “structure-process-value”. The study reveals that social work organizations can guide village level governance organizations into a structured process through service outsourcing, fostering a cooperative organizational structure for project operation that revitalizes local participation; By reengineering the whole process of cooperative planning, design, delivery and evaluation, a connected service chain is established to expand service coverage. Furthermore, by redefining rural publicity, the study highlights the co-creation of the high-quality and efficient service value, and the governance value that enhances participation, and the public value grounded in trust and collaberation. The interlinked mechanisms of structure creation, process reengineering and value co-creation provide meaningful insights for the grass-roots implementation of the project systems and the effective supply of rural public services.

Key words: social work, cooperative production, public service projects, comprehensive Rural Revitalization

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[N]. 人民日报, 2022-10-26(001).
[2] 中共中央 国务院关于学习运用“千村示范、万村整治”工程经验有力有效推进乡村全面振兴的意见[N]. 人民日报, 2024-02-04(001).
[3] 郑广怀. 乡镇社工站推动乡村公共价值合作生产的过程与机制[J]. 学海, 2023(5): 132-145.
[4] 张良. 项目制如何形塑农村基层治理[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2023(5): 82-91,113,159.
[5] 渠敬东. 项目制: 一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(5): 113-130,207.
[6] 余成龙, 冷向明. “项目制”悖论抑或治理问题——农村公共服务项目制供给与可持续发展[J]. 公共管理学报, 2019(2): 147-158,176.
[7] 黄晓春. 中国社会组织成长条件的再思考——一个总体性理论视角[J]. 社会学研究, 2017(1): 101-124,244.
[8] 黄晓勇, 徐明, 郭磊, 等. 中国社会组织报告(2022)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2022.
[9] 吴宝家, 唐银彬. 合作生产赋能农村环境公共服务有效供给的机制探讨——基于四川省D镇巷道环境整治的案例研究[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(5): 95-105.
[10] 顾江霞. 社会工作服务项目战略规划的“三重逻辑”辨析——以广州和佛山社会工作服务项目发展为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021(1): 64-72.
[11] 陶有祥, 成婷. 精准脱贫战略下乡村振兴内生力机制研究——基于产业振兴的视角[J]. 理论与现代化, 2018(5): 52-58.
[12] 张博, 梅莹莹. 全面推进乡村振兴视域下的农村生态环境治理: 政策演进与路径选择[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(2): 112-120.
[13] 郭芳. 乡村振兴背景下社会工作参与农村社区治理提升路径研究[J]. 村委主任, 2023(7): 31-33.
[14] 李祖佩. 项目下乡与农村基层治理模式优化——以“嵌入的自主性”为视角[J]. 政治学研究, 2023(6): 202-213,236.
[15] 王富国. 乡村振兴背景下社会工作参与农村社区治理的路径[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2022(19): 128-130.
[16] 李晓昀, 邓崧, 胡佳. 数字技术赋能乡镇政务服务: 逻辑、障碍与进路[J]. 电子政务, 2021(8): 29-39.
[17] 赵方方. 社会工作介入农村社区治理实践研究——以三亚市S村社区为例[J]. 农场经济管理, 2020(10): 33-35.
[18] 任其远. 浅谈社会工作介入农村社区治理[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2021(8): 254-256.
[19] 王思斌. 社会工作在创新社会治理体系中的地位和作用——一种基础—服务型社会治理[J]. 社会工作, 2014(1): 3-10,150.
[20] 郭道久. 协作治理是适合中国现实需求的治理模式[J]. 政治学研究, 2016(1): 61-70,126-127.
[21] 钱坤. 从“悬浮”到“嵌入”: 外生型社会组织参与乡村治理的困境与出路[J]. 云南行政学院学报, 2020(1): 25-30.
[22] 武小龙, 康旭晖. “曲线型”嵌入: 社会工作机构参与社区治理的过程逻辑[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(5): 39-52.
[23] 钟祥虎. 社会工作的嵌入: 农村公共文化服务体系创新模式构建[J]. 湖北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(6): 53-57.
[24] 任文启, 顾东辉. 基层治理专业化视野下社会工作站建设的进程、困境与实践策略[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022(6): 50-59.
[25] 林磊. 在地内生性: 社会组织自主性的微观生产机制——以福建省Q市A社工组织为例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(7): 79-86.
[26] 刘传俊, 刘祖云. 基于协同治理视角下农村公共服务主体博弈与有效供给[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2018(3): 57-65.
[27] 许丹. 中国农村公共文化服务高质量发展——基本内涵、问题清单与行动框架[J]. 社会科学研究, 2021(5): 115-123.
[28] 刘闯, 王亚华, 刘璐. 专业注入与集体激活: 社工参与农村公共服务供给的实践逻辑——以北京市赵庄子村为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2024(1): 45-64.
[29] SORRENTINO M, SICILIA M, HOWLETT M. Understanding coproduction as a new public governance tool[J]. Policy and society, 2018, 37(3): 277-293.
[30] 王学军, 陈友倩. 合作生产治理效能提升的机制构建[J]. 行政论坛, 2023(5): 90-100.
[31] OSTROM E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development[J]. World development, 1996, 24(6): 1073-1087.
[32] 张云翔. 公共服务的共同生产: 文献综述及其启示[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2018(5): 31-45,126.
[33] BOVAIRD T. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services[J]. Public administration review, 2007, 67(5): 846-860.
[34] 杨康, 李放, 沈苏燕. 农村互助养老绩效的内涵及其实践逻辑: 基于合作生产视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022(4): 118-132.
[35] 潘莉, 孙洁, 王晔安. 合作生产视角下乡镇社会工作站促建社区韧性的机制研究——以望城“禾计划”项目为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2022(4): 75-85,100.
[36] 王家合, 杨倩文. 数字技术赋能乡村公共服务价值共创: 结构、过程与结果[J]. 理论探讨, 2024(1): 70-78.
[37] 王丽. 善治视域下乡村治理的公共性困境及其重构[J]. 行政论坛, 2022(3): 99-104.
[38] 刘津. 村民参与村治的行动逻辑及关系结构困境[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(5): 59-70.
[39] 高万红, 李晓娇, 王硕. 乡村振兴战略中农村妇女参与基层治理的路径研究——以云南楚雄彝族自治州W村妇女组织建设为例[J]. 社会工作, 2023(6): 54-65,103-104.
[40] 刘天文. 行政借道社会: 基层治理创新中的政府调适行为研究——基于Z省S区的经验案例分析[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(3): 66-79.
[41] 张康之. 走向合作制组织: 组织模式的重构[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020(1): 47-63,205.
[42] W. 理查德·斯科特, 杰拉尔德·F. 戴维斯. 组织理论: 理性、自然与开放系统的视角[M]. 高俊山, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011: 89.
[43] 张诚, 刘祖云. 乡村公共空间的公共性困境及其重塑[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(2): 1-7,163.
[44] 郭险峰. 从“赋能”到“价值实现”: 新时代乡村振兴的逻辑理路与实践进路[J]. 四川行政学院学报, 2023(6): 5-13,101.
[45] 景跃进. 中国农村基层治理的逻辑转换——国家与乡村社会关系的再思考[J]. 治理研究, 2018(1): 48-57.
[46] 曹海林, 周全. “项目进村”实施中的行政能力、产业推进与村民收益[J]. 社会发展研究, 2023(2): 122-138,244.
[1] LIU Binzhi, LI Xiangting. Procedural Guidelines and Core Techniques of Nostalgia Therapy in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(3): 1-9,41.
[2] ZHUO Caiqin, QIN Yue, ZHANG Qianxin. Developing a Competency-Based Social Worker-Involved Employment Training Model for Individuals with Disabilities: A Practical Study on Employment Training Programs for Visually Impaired Baristas [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(3): 10-23.
[3] ZHU Yuanyuan, TANG Siwei. The Coupling Mechanisms, Current Situation and Pathways for Empowering New Local Social Work Talent in the Construction of New Quality Productive Forces [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(3): 24-33.
[4] XIE Han. The Impact of School Interpersonal Relationships on the Mental Health of Rural Children: A Comparison Between Left-Behind and Non-Left-Behind Children [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(3): 34-41.
[5] XU Qilong, ZHANG Junhao. A Study on the Process and Mechanism of Border Social Work Stations in Promoting the Accessibility of Basic Public Services in Border Areas [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(3): 68-80.
[6] HE Xuesong, KUANG Mengye, HU Yi, WU Yilan. 2024 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 1-16.
[7] CHEN Tao, WU Cuizhen, XU Yuezhen. County-Level Social Work: The Practice Path of China’s Macro Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 17-23.
[8] TONG Min, ZHOU Xiaotong. Research on Endogenous Power Production Mechanism of Rural Remote Villages in Mountainous County Under the Rural Revitalization Strategy: Taking the Social Work Stations in Towns N and C of Country D in Quanzhou City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 24-34.
[9] HOU Liwen, LI Huan. Ethical Practice of County-Level Social Work Organizations: A Case Study of Cang [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 35-43.
[10] LIU Jiang, GENG Tongtong, GU Qunfeng. The Development of County-Level Social Work: An Explanation on the Mutual Shaping Mechanism Between Leadership Attention Allocation and Social Work Professional Communities [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 44-54.
[11] KANG Jiao, FENG Yuliang. Practice Limits and Development Strategies of Evidence-Based Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 55-64.
[12] YANG Pan, LIANG Tukun. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Human Capital on Social Workers’ Turnover Intention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 65-75.
[13] LIANG Yucheng, LEI Jie, SU Zhenhao, DU Yanrong. Digital Social Work: Expert Consensus on Definition, Significance, and Practice (2024) [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 1-9.
[14] BU He, TANG Yao, DUAN Wenjie. Pathways of the Intersection of Social Work Practice and Artificial Intelligence [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 10-18.
[15] LIU Yulan. Research on the Reconstruction of Community Rehabilitation Service System for Disabled Children from the Perspective of Developmental Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 19-26.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!