SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 44-51,73.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Adaptive Reconstruction: Coping Strategies and Practical Mechanisms of Community Organizations in Service Filling Under the Background of Post-Project System: Take the Governance Process of S Community Committee in C City as an Example

WU Rui, TANG Wei   

  1. College of International Law and Sociology, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, 400031, China
  • Received:2024-10-09 Online:2025-09-15 Published:2025-09-15

Abstract: The introduction of professional social work organizations in the project system plays an important role in improving the quality of community governance. While existing studies have examined the process, difficulties, and effects of social work intervention in community service, they often neglect how community organizations consolidate service achievements after project completion. The practice of the Neighborhood Committee of S Community in C City shows that, when faced with challenges following the completion of a social work project, the community has adopted a series of practical mechanisms guided by “adaptive restructuring” through “survival coping strategies”, “development coping strategies” and “supportive coping strategies”. These mechanisms include nurturing successors, division of labor, mobilizing community activists, and finding partners to ensure the continuity of service. In order to realize the long-term sustainable development of community services, it is essential not only to ensure the high-quality implementation of the project but also to focus on cultivating the self-sufficiency of the community, establishing stable cooperative relations, and promoting the long-term construction of community self-organization.

Key words: adaptive reconstruction, post-project system, community organization, coping strategy

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 李红飞, 甘满堂. 随迁老人的社区融入及社会工作介入研究——以深圳市L社区为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2017(1): 31-37.
[2] 廖鸿冰, 李斌. 社会工作介入社区居家养老服务研究[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2014(6): 121-124.
[3] 钟莹, 刘传龙. 《禁毒法》背景下的社区戒毒工作与社会工作介入[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011(3): 109-113.
[4] 方舒. 我国社会工作参与社区矫正机制的检视与创新[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2013(3): 143-146,154.
[5] 王思斌. 社会工作在创新社会治理体系中的地位和作用——一种基础—服务型社会治理[J]. 社会工作, 2014(1): 3-10,150.
[6] 李文静. 社会工作在社区治理创新中的作用研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(4): 21-27.
[7] 李学斌, 严雪. 论社会工作在社区建设中的作用[J]. 社会工作下半月(理论), 2008(4): 10-13.
[8] 折晓叶, 陈婴婴. 项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑——对“项目进村”案例的社会学分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(4): 126-148,223.
[9] 渠敬东. 项目制: 一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(5): 113-130,207.
[10] 付伟, 焦长权. “协调型”政权: 项目制运作下的乡镇政府[J]. 社会学研究, 2015(2): 98-123,243-244.
[11] 郑广怀, 王晔安, 马铭子. “以红领专”: 社会工作者的专业自主性与国家的领导权建构[J]. 社会学研究, 2021(6): 136-155,229.
[12] 徐俊萍. 社会工作专业服务的持续性探索——基于“蓓蕾成长计划”项目的思考[J]. 青春岁月, 2014(21): 94-95.
[13] 张育广, 姚欢芸. 风险治理中社区组织韧性: 意涵、局限与优化[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2023(1): 91-100.
[14] 李永胜, 张玉容. 基层党建在城市社区治理中的作用、问题及创新研究[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(5): 112-118.
[15] 吴莹. 空间变革下的治理策略——“村改居”社区基层治理转型研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2017(6): 94-116,244.
[16] 杜培培, 陈光裕. 空间重构视域下老单位社区变迁及其治理策略研究[J]. 学习与实践, 2019(7): 108-117.
[17] 袁君刚, 马文嘉. 单位制社区转型的实践创新与治理策略——以山东省C社区为例[J]. 东北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(4): 36-45.
[18] 周晨虹. 内生的社区发展: “资产为本”的社区发展理论与实践路径[J]. 社会工作, 2014(4): 41-49,153.
[19] 黄晓春, 嵇欣. 非协同治理与策略性应对——社会组织自主性研究的一个理论框架[J]. 社会学研究, 2014(6): 98-123,244.
[20] 王思斌. 中国社会工作的嵌入性发展[J]. 社会科学战线, 2011(2): 206-222.
[1] ZHANG Yuguang, YAO Huanyun. Community Organization Resilience in Risk Governance: Implications, Limitations and Optimization [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23(1): 91-98.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!