SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 52-64,110.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Application and Thinking of CIPP Model in the Evaluation of Social Work Service Project: Take the H Institution Rural Preschool Child Care Project as an Example

CHEN Chaolian, HE Hu   

  1. College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming,Yunnan, 650201,China
  • Received:2024-10-22 Online:2025-09-15 Published:2025-09-15

Abstract: With the continuous expansion of government-funded social work services, social work is emerging as a vital professional force in social governance, garnering increasing attention from both the government and society. A significant challenge confronting the field is how to evaluate the professionalism and effectiveness of its services scientifically. The CIPP model, known for its systematic, comprehensive, and improvement-oriented approach, is particularly suited for evaluating social work projects. This study employs the CIPP model to evaluate the rural childcare program of Institution H, integrating the Delphi method to construct an evaluation index system that supplements and optimizes the existing framework. Through assessments of the project’s context, input, process, and outcomes, the study provides improvement recommendations, such as increasing the budget for enhancing social workers’ professional capabilities, deepening needs assessments, prioritizing service quality, refining service plans, and improving supervision efficiency. To refine and optimize the social work evaluation system, it is crucial to establish a feedback-oriented evaluation mechanism, emphasize the professional development of social work, and shift from audit-focused evaluations to empowerment-based assessments. This approach ensures the dual objectives of performance evaluation and professional growth, ultimately achieving “improvement through evaluation” and “correction through evaluation.”

Key words: rural preschool children, childcare services, CIPP evaluation model, social work project evaluation

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 民政部 财政部关于政府购买社会工作服务的指导意见[EB/OL]. [2024-03-28]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2013/content2361580.htm.
[2] 杜元钰. 政府购买资产评估专业服务研究[J]. 中国资产评估, 2015(8): 29-32.
[3] 李秀峰, 祝军. 共青团“青年之家”实体平台的评估指标体系研究——基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的应用[J]. 中国青年社会科学, 2021(2): 28-39.
[4] 胡志利. 基于CIPP的本科院校应用型人才培养评价模式研究[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2022(1): 124-128.
[5] NEHE A, SATYAWATI S T, DWIKURNANINGSIH Y. Evaluation of comprehensive guidance and counseling program using the CIPP model[J]. Inovasi kurikulum, 2024, 21(3): 1633-1648.
[6] STUFFLEBEAM D L. The CIPP model for program evaluation[J]. Evaluation models, 1983(6): 117-141.
[7] 武茜璇. CIPP模型在社区教育项目评估中的应用及思考——基于全国“终身学习品牌项目”的个案研究[J]. 高等继续教育学报, 2023(1): 29-35, 71.
[8] 王宇红, 吴迪茵. 社会工作视角下的公益性儿童托管服务项目之社会生态系统分析. [J] 南京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2013(3): 80-86.
[9] 方巍, 祝建华, 何铨. 社会项目评估[M]. 上海: 格致出版社, 上海人民出版社, 2012.
[10] STUFFLEBEAM D L, SHINKFIELD A J. Systematic evaluation [M]. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, 2017 : 170-171.
[11] STUFFLEBEAM D L, SHINKFIELD A J. The CIPP model for evaluation[A]//STUFFLEBEAM D L, KELLAGHAN T. The international handbook of educational evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003: 85-138.
[12] 殷世东. 中小学劳动教育课程评价体系的建构与运行: 基于CIPP课程评价模式[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2021(10): 85-88, 98.
[13] 曹伟军, 赵周洁. 整合导向的社会工作服务项目评估指标体系建构研究——基于济南市槐荫区的实践经验[J]. 社会政策研究, 2019(2): 149-161.
[14] 赵传达. 利用几种不同的评估工具进行社会工作项目服务成效评估的比较研究——以新公民社工”流动儿童全面发展项目”的评估为例[D]. 北京: 中国社会科学院, 2013: 1-10.
[15] 石晓霞. 基于CIPP模式的心智障碍儿童融合教育项目评估研究——以D社工机构为例[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021: 5-9.
[16] 夏志英. 档案管理理论现代化与实践方法研究——评《档案管理理论与实践》[J]. 人民长江, 2024 (11): 257-258.
[17] 朱晨海, 曾群. 结果导向的社会工作评估指标体系建构研究——以都江堰市城北馨居灾后重建服务为例[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2009(3): 63-68.
[18] 徐道稳, 唐达婷. 责信理论视角下社会工作机构绩效评估研究——以 S 市社会工作机构绩效评估为例 [J]. 社会工作与管理, 2020(4): 28-36.
[19] 刘江, 顾东辉. 方法为本、理论驱动与机制分析——社会工作服务效果评估的三种策略[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021(6): 5-13.
[20] 姚进忠, 崔坤杰. 绩效抑或专业: 我国社会工作评估的困境与对策[J]. 中州学刊, 2015(1): 73-78.
[21] 陈天祥, 等. 政府绩效评估与管理: 政治、过程与技术 [M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社. 2015: 39.
[1] HE Longtao, PENG Huamin. The Caregiving Experiences of Cancer Patients’ Family Caregivers: Based on the Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Chinese and American Qualitative Studies [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 1-14,22.
[2] CHEN Airu, DUAN Runzhi. A Practical Study on Creating Child-Friendly Communities From the Perspective of Children’s Independent Activity: Analysis of the W Community Children’s Service Project [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 15-22.
[3] TAN Lei, LIAO Ying. The Development Trajectory and Logical Evolution of Professional Service for Social Work Stations in Towns (Sub-Districts): A Case Study of City G [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 23-31,43.
[4] LI Qingxian. Internet Utilization, Social Capital and the Involvement of the Grey-Haired Group in Volunteer Services: An Empirical Analysis Grounded on the Data of CSS2023 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 32-43.
[5] WU Rui, TANG Wei. Adaptive Reconstruction: Coping Strategies and Practical Mechanisms of Community Organizations in Service Filling Under the Background of Post-Project System: Take the Governance Process of S Community Committee in C City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 44-51,73.
[6] HE Jixin, GAO Wenjing. External Constraints and Endogenous Motivation: A Study on the Obstacles for the Young Elderly to Participate in the Construction of Grassroots Governance Community [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 65-73.
[7] BAI Yue. Optimization Path Analysis on Collaborative Governance Under the Mechanism of the “Linkage of Five Elements in the Community” [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 74-84,96.
[8] ZHANG Chi. A Study on the Effect Evaluation of Home Community Elderly Care Service Policy From the Perspective of Policy Subject [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(5): 97-110.
[9] CHEN Jinsong, HAN Fang, CAI Guoliang. A Study on the Spirit of Verbal Exploration in Case Talks Based on Data and Information [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 1-7,25.
[10] ZHANG Zhaoguo, LU Chunyan. Pathways for New Quality Productivity to Empower High-Quality Development of Service Efficiency in Social Work Stations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 8-15.
[11] HUANG Haiping. Professional Locking and Response Strategies in Social Work Practice Under the Background of Rural Revitalization: Taking the Township Social Work Stations in C and S Towns of Y City, Guangdong Province as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 16-25.
[12] XIANG Yu, SHEN Libing, HE Zhifeng. The Politics of Evidence: What Is Service Effectiveness? A thematic Analysis Based on Interviews with Stakeholders of Government-Purchased Social Work Services [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 26-37.
[13] YANG Weiwei, GUO Qiusheng. Context Construction and Localization Adjustment of School Social Work: Based on the Investigation and Research of Puyang Experimental Primary School [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 38-46.
[14] JIA Bo, HASI Eerdun, WANG Qinggeletu. A Study on the Professional Competence of Medical Social Workers and Their Influencing Factors in Inner Mongolia: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Data of Inner Mongolia Medical Social Worker Dynamics Survey in 2023 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 47-57.
[15] WEN Tenglong, ZHOU Xianda, CHENG Fu. Active Aging and Empowerment: An Action Framework and Implementation Strategies of Social Work Services for Elderly Living Alone [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(4): 58-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!