SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 21-31.
Previous Articles Next Articles
A Study on the Impact of Challenging and Obstructive Stressors on the Turnover Intention of Social Workers: Workplace Anxiety and the Role of Future Job Self-Clarity
LI Zhengdong, WANG Jin
- School of Humanities, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, 201418, China
CLC Number:
- C916
| [1] 牛莉霞, 乔亚凡, 夏文德. 绩效压力对工作繁荣的“双刃剑”效应: 工作反刍和组织支持感的作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2024(3): 21-34. [2] 李宗波, 李锐. 挑战性—阻碍性压力源研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2013(5): 40-49,59. [3] CAVANAUGH M A, BOSWELL W R, ROEHLING M V, et al. An empirical examination of self-reported workstress among U. S. managers[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2000, 85(1): 65-74. [4] 胡高强. 社会工作者工作支持、职业认同与工作情绪[J]. 调研世界, 2021(4): 41-47. [5] 李正东. 社会工作从业人员职业认同及其影响因素研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(2): 66-76. [6] LEPINE M A, ZHANG Y W, CRAWFORD E R, et al. Turning their pain to gain: charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance[J]. Academy of management journal, 2016, 59(3): 1036-1059. [7] SHANTZ A, AREVSHATIAN L, ALFES K, et al. The effect of HRM attributions on emotional exhaustion and the mediating roles of job involvement and work overload[J]. Human resource management journal, 2016, 26(2): 172-191. [8] 丁照军, 王富强, 张玲玲. 挑战性—阻碍性压力源对隐性知识共享意愿影响的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023(19): 92-110. [9] 廖化化, 颜爱民. 情绪劳动与工作倦怠——一个来自酒店业的体验样本研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016(4): 147-158. [10] 王鉴忠, 李琦, 宋君卿, 等. 积极组织行为学视角下辱虐管理与员工乐观解释风格对离职倾向的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2020(5): 688-696. [11] 陈浩, 黄乔茵, 舒小悦, 等. 绩效压力下的职场孤独感缓解机制研究——一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 中国人事科学, 2024(8): 61-74. [12] SELYE H. The stress of life[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978: 137. [13] KHLIEFAT A, CHEN H. The impact of the challenge and hindrance stress on hotel employees interpersonal citizenship behaviors: psychological capital as a moderator[J]. International journal of hospitality management, 2021, 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102886. [14] 许涛, 范亚冰, 姚昊. 挑战性—阻碍性压力对教师创新工作行为的影响效应与机制[J]. 现代教育论丛, 2024(5): 82-93. [15] 任磊, 刘燕. 挑战性—阻碍性压力源对员工主动变革行为的影响机理[J]. 企业经济, 2022(8): 101-111. [16] 刘芳, 姜冬梅. 工作压力对企业会计人员离职倾向的影响研究——以员工被信任感为调节变量[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2018(24): 27-28, 31. [17] 李宗波, 彭翠. 挑战性—阻碍性压力对工作满意度、情绪衰竭的差异性影响——上下属关系的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2014(3): 82-86. [18] 李正东, 郭森森. 工作压力何以影响员工的离职倾向?——自我效能感的视角[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(2): 69-85. [19] 李正东, 王津. 职场焦虑研究的知识谱系、理论框架与未来展望[J/OL]. 河南科技大学学报(社会科学版). [2025-06-29]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/41.1356.C.20250530.0940.002.html. [20] CHENG B H, MCCARTHY J M. Understanding the dark and bright sides of anxiety: a theory of workplace anxiety[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2018, 103(5): 537-560. [21] FEENEY J R, MCCARTHY J M, GOFFIN R J. Applicant anxiety: examining the sex-linked anxiety coping theory in job interview contexts[J]. International journal of selection and assessment, 2015, 23(3): 295-305. [22] LIU C E, YU S, CHEN Y, et al. Supervision incivility and employee psychological safety in the workplace[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(3): 840. [23] 李志成, 王震, 祝振兵, 等. 基于情绪认知评价的员工绩效压力对亲组织非伦理行为的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018(3): 358-365. [24] HOBFOLL S E. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancingconservation of resources theory[J]. Applied psychology, 2001, 50(3): 337-421. [25] 张亚军, 肖小虹. 挑战性—阻碍性压力对员工创造力的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016(6): 10-18. [26] 周霞, 王亚丹. 强制性公民行为对知识型员工离职倾向的影响研究: 一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018(5): 159-165. [27] 徐洋洋, 林新奇, 习怡衡. 孤独的员工何时会更投入: 未来工作自我清晰度和变革型领导的干预效应研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019(5): 79-89. [28] 焦昕婷, 赵慧军, 门贺. 多任务处理一定会导致拖延吗? —基于调节焦点理论的视角[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2024(6): 131-144. [29] STRAUSS K, GRIFFIN M A, PARKER S K. Future work selves: how salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2012, 97(3): 580-598. [30] 张敏, 叶茂林, 彭坚, 等. 未来工作自我: 概念、测量及其相关研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016(5): 794-803. [31] 张昊民, 徐书会, 马君. 打工人还是追梦人? 自我验证视角下工作意义对员工主动性行为的影响研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2021(1): 37-47. [32] LIN W, WANG L, BAMBERGER P A, et al. Leading future orientations for current effectiveness: the role of engagement and supervisor coaching in linking future work self salience to job performance[J]. Journal of vocational behavior, 2016, 92(2): 145-156. [33] ARIF M, SINDHU M, UROOJ S F, et al. Impact of abusive supervision on turnover intention through future work self-salience and organization-based self-esteem[J]. International journal of organizational leadership, 2017, 6(4): 481-490. [34] HALBESLEBEN J R, WHEELER A R. I owe you one: coworker reciprocity as a moderator of the day-level exhaustion-performance relationship[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 2011, 32(4): 608-626. [35] BOWLER W M, PAUL J B, HALBESLEBEN J R. LMX and attributions of organizational citizenship behavior motives: when is citizenship perceived as brownnosing?[J]. Journal of business and psychology, 2019, 34(2): 139-152. [36] MOBLEY W H. Intermediate linkages in relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover[J]. Journalof applied psychology, 1977, 62(2): 237-240. [37] 黄亚夫, 王慧, 曾小叶, 等. 职场焦虑量表中文版测评员工的效度和信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2022(8): 719-723. [38] TUCKEY M R, BEN J S, CAROLYN M B, et al. Hindrances are not threats: advancing the multidimensionality of work stress[J]. Journal of occupational health psychology, 2015, 20(2): 131-147. [39] 杨刚, 高梦竹, 纪谱华, 等. 挑战性—阻碍性压力源是否导致员工知识隐藏? ——情绪耗竭与正念思维的作用[J]. 软科学, 2021(9): 68-74, 87. [40] 庞晓华, 栗继祖, 徐丽丽, 等. 新生代矿工挑战性—阻碍性压力对工作倦怠的影响——基于组织公平感与心理弹性的作用机制[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023(10): 93-99. [41] ABBAS M, RAJA U. Challenge-hindrance stressors and job outcomes: the moderating role of conscientiousness[J]. Journal of business and psychology, 2019, 34(2): 189-201. [42] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211. [43] 唐贵瑶, 胡冬青, 吴隆增, 等. 辱虐管理对员工人际偏差行为的影响及其作用机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2014(12): 1782-1789. [44] HASTINGS, STEPHANIE E, et al. The Structure of counterproductive work behavior: a review, a structural meta-analysis, and a primary study[J]. Journal of management, 2016, 42(1): 203-233. [45] HOM P W, LEE T W, SHAW J D, et al. One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2017, 102(3): 530-545. |
|
||