SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 1-9,19.

    Next Articles

Working With Technological Artefacts: The Nonhuman Turn in Social Work Intervention in the Digital-Intelligent Era

LV Jieqiong   

  1. Department of Society and Culture, Party School of C. P. C. Jiangsu Committee, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009,China
  • Received:2025-11-20 Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-15

Abstract: The advent of the digital-intelligent era has introduced new opportunities for technological artefacts to reshape the boundaries and practical modes of social work services. The application of technological artefacts is promoting a “nonhuman turn” in social work intervention wherein nonhuman entities function as active agents in practical networks. As supporters of social workers, technological artefacts engage in translation processes such as problematization, interessement, enrollment, and mobilization within relational networks composing both human and nonhuman entities. Through these processes, technological artefacts collaborate with human actors to form joint agency and advance the effectiveness of social work interventions. Social workers collaborating with technological artefacts should adhere to contextualized principles, including assessing the situational appropriateness of technologies, engaging in ongoing critical reflections on their agential effects, and actively participating in “value negotiation” with technological artefacts. Social workers are key actors, translators, and constructors within the “human-nonhuman assemblage” intervention network, driving the ecology of social work practice towards fairness, justice, and enhanced well-being. The “nonhuman turn” enriches our understanding of the complexities of social work practice in an era characterized by deeply intertwined human-nonhuman relationships.

Key words: social work practice, nonhuman turn, technological artefacts, digital-intelligent era

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 我国生成式人工智能用户规模已达5.15亿人 普及率为36.5%[EB/OL]. (2025-10-18). http://finance.people.com.cn/n1/2025/1018/c1004-40584654.html.
[2] 国务院关于深入实施“人工智能+”行动的意见[EB/OL]. [2026-01-04]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202508/content_7037862.htm.
[3] Richard G. The nonhuman turn[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015: 7.
[4] Savalois N, Lescureux N, Brunois F. Teaching the dog and learning from the dog: interactivity in herding dog training and use[J]. Anthrozoos, 2013, 26(1): 77-91
[5] 刘斌志, 王李源. 园艺疗法: 面向人与自然和谐关系的社会工作新探索[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019(6): 48-55
[6] Oca?a C M, Botero M R. Socio-digital intervention: towards what future do we want to walk to?[J]. Sociologia y tecnociencia, 2021, 11(2): 310-325
[7] 韩江风, 陈凤. 技术不确定性视角下数字社会工作的发展机遇与转型风险[J]. 甘肃开放大学学报, 2024(5): 1-6
[8] 吉尔贝?西蒙东. 论技术物的存在模式[M]. 许煜, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2024: 11, 14, 30.
[9] 董金平. 从身体规训到精神控制——如何走出智能时代技术物操控的藩篱[J]. 山东师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2025(6): 157-168
[10] 刘雨婷. 社会学视域下的五种数字观[J]. 社会学研究, 2023(4): 205-225
[11] Markovic D. Digital social work or e-social work? Towards social work in a digital environment [EB/OL]. [2026-03-07]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/3181485521?pq-origsite=wos&accountid=10659&sourcetype=Conference%20Papers%20&%20Proceedings.
[12] González P G, Rodríguez C M C, Hernández A M. The perception of social workers on the implications of Artificial intelligence in their professional practices: an exploratory study[J]. Cuadernos de trabajo social, 2025, 38(1): 97-108
[13] Latimer J, Miele M. Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non-human[J]. Theory culture & society, 2013, 30(7-8): 5-31
[14] Ihde D. Technology and the lifeworld [M]. Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990: 68-80.
[15] Verbeek P P. Cyborg intentionality: rethinking the phenomenology of human-technology relations[J]. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 2008, 7(3): 387-395
[16] Murray A, Rhymer J, Sirmon D G. Humans and technology: forms of conjoined agency in organizations[J]. Academy of management review, 2021, 46(3): 552-571
[17] Muhle F. Robots as addressable non-persons: an analysis of categorial work at the boundaries of the social world[J]. Frontiers in sociology, 2024, 9: 126083
[18] 李生柱, 龙宇晓. 作为一种行动者网络的民俗实践——来自拉图尔及其巴黎学派的理论启示[J]. 贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025(2): 77-97
[19] 刘冰, 陈沐瑶. 数字社会工作: 实践进展、总体特征与未来议题[J]. 社会工作, 2024(6): 1-22
[20] Pink S, Ferguson H, Kelly L. Digital social work: conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice[J]. Qualitative social work: research and practice, 2022, 21(2): 413-30
[21] 周巍, 李开. 增能视角下社会工作服务数字化的伦理困境与实践路向[J]. 社会工作, 2024(6): 69-89
[22] Kanani K, Regehr C. Clinical, ethical, and legal issues in e-therapy[J]. Families in society-the journal of contemporary human services, 2003, 84(2): 155-162
[23] Mishna F, Milne E, Bogo M, et al. Responding to COVID-19: new trends in social workers’ use of information and communication technology[J]. Clinical social work journal, 2021, 49(4): 484-94
[24] 吴越菲. 迈向跨区域服务传送的乡村振兴: 网络社会工作的实践可能[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(5): 39-48
[25] Thompson K. Multi-agency information practices in children’s services: the metaphorical “jigsaw” and professionals quest for a “full” picture[J]. Child & family social work, 2013, 18(2): 189-197
[26] Brownlee K, Graham J R, Doucette E, et al. Have communication technologies influenced rural social work practice?[J]. British journal of social work, 2010, 40(2): 622-637
[27] Reamer F G. Social work in a digital age: ethical and risk management challenges[J]. Social work, 2013, 58(2): 163-172
[28] Nicholas D B, Fellner K D, Frank M, et al. Evaluation of an online education and support intervention for adolescents with diabetes[J]. Social work in health care, 2012, 51(9): 815-827
[29] Materia F T, Smyth J M. Acceptability of intervention design factors in mHealth intervention research: experimental factorial study[J]. Jmir mhealth and uhealth, 2021, 9(7): e23303
[30] La Rose T, Detlor B. Social work digital storytelling project: digital literacy, digital storytelling, and the makerspace[J]. Research on social work practice, 2021, 31(6): 599-609
[31] 严艺文. 数字技术赋能专业社会工作的叙事实践[J]. 社会建设, 2025(1): 79-97
[32] 王瑞华. 互联网+社工: 提升社会治理能力的新路径[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2020(5): 134-143
[33] Lehtiniemi T. Contextual social valences for artificial intelligence: anticipation that matters in social work[J]. Information communication & society, 2024, 27(6): 1110-1125
[34] 何龙韬. AI+安宁疗护社会工作线上服务的干预设计研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(6): 27-44
[35] Sarwar A, Harris M. Children’s services in the age of information technology: what matters most to frontline professionals[J]. Journal of social work, 2019, 19(6): 699-718
[36] Devlieghere J, Bradt L, Roose R. Policy rationales for electronic information systems: an area of ambiguity[J]. British journal of social work, 2017, 47(5): 1500-1516
[37] Senior R, Pickett L, Stirling A, et al. Development of an interactive dashboard for gun violence pattern analysis and intervention design at the local level[EB/OL]. [2026-03-07]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2902974707?pq-origsite=wos&accountid=10659&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals.
[38] Chan C, Sage M. A narrative review of digital storytelling for social work practice[J]. Journal of social work Practice, 2021, 35(1): 63-77
[39] 刘帅. “非人类转向”: 共生性景观与具体化机制——兼论文学本体论探讨的新方向[J]. 海峡人文学刊, 2024(4): 21-30, 152
[40] Pfadenhauer M, Dukat C. Robot caregiver or robot-supported caregiving?[J]. International journal of social robotics, 2015, 7: 393-406
[41] Labour B. On actor-network theory[J]. Soziale welt zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche forschung und praxis, 1996, 47(47): 369-381
[42] Labour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2005: 64-71.
[43] Labour B. Mixing humans and nonhumans together: the sociology of a Door-Closer[J]. Social problems, 1988, 35(3): 298-310
[44] Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc bay[J]. The sociological review, 1984, 32(1): 196-233
[45] 邱泽奇. 人机社会的治理转向[J]. 社会, 2025, 45(3): 2-18
[46] 刘鹏. 行动者网络理论: 理论、方法与实践[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2020: 1.
[47] 戴宇辰. “物”缘何行动?——拉图尔的“物之社会学”考察[J]. 社会学评论, 2023(2): 191-211
[48] 吴莹, 卢雨霞, 陈家建, 等. 跟随行动者重组社会——读拉图尔的《重组社会: 行动者网络理论》[J]. 社会学研究, 2008(2): 218-234
[49] 上海普陀社会工作. [治理有谱]AI社工, 为基层干部精准赋能[EB/OL]. [2025-11-10]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/x3IEQLk7W7O5fROcfNWZDw.
[50] 上海普陀社会工作. [细“治”入微]当AI赋能“社工”, 能为社区治理带来什么变化?[EB/OL]. [2025-11-10] . https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/24K4f40_ULzSurZcglfQsA.
[51] 王宛艺. 融合15个信息系统, “一次认证一口登录”——上海深化“社区云”平台建设, 着力减轻基层干部“数字负担”[N]. 文汇报, 2025-05-13(02).
[52] 童敏. 空间思维的实践转向: 本土社会工作专业化何以可能[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2020(4): 93-99
[53] 彭善民. 社会工作与公共生活建构[J]. 学习与实践, 2013(7): 108-113
[54] Cheung J C-S, Ho S C-Y, Yau C-Y. Social work in the era of WEB 3.0[J]. Journal of social work, 2025, 25(3): 418-423
[55] 文军, 陈宇涵. 人工智能社会工作情智融合发展的机遇与挑战[J]. 求索, 2025(2): 76-85
[56] Elder-vass D. Searching for realism, structure and agency in Actor Network Theory[J]. British journal of sociology, 2008, 59(3): 455-473
[57] 卫小将. 国家社会工作的理念、内涵与发展策略[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(6): 108-116
[58] 卫小将, 林媛媚. 数字社会工作的技术异化与人文重申[J]. 中州学刊, 2025(4): 75-83
[59] 文军. 重回“人”的新时代: 构建有生命力的社会学[J]. 社会科学, 2024(10): 184-199
[1] LI Shanshan. Professional Relationships in Social Work From the Perspective of the Nonhuman Turn: Reconstruction, Challenges, and Reflections [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2026, 26(5): 10-19.
[2] HE Xuesong, YU yu, MIAO miao. 2025 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2026, 26(2): 1-26.
[3] HE Xuesong, KUANG Mengye, HU Yi, WU Yilan. 2024 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(2): 1-16.
[4] WU Juan. Progress and Prospects of Practice Research on Social Work in China: Quantitative Analysis Based on CSSCI Journal Literature from 1998 to 2023 [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25(1): 38-48.
[5] ZHANG Xiao-Hong. Ethical Dilemma in the Practice of Localization of Social Work
——A Study of Guangzhou Integrated Family Service Centre
[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 15(4): 23-29.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!