SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 10-19.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Professional Relationships in Social Work From the Perspective of the Nonhuman Turn: Reconstruction, Challenges, and Reflections

LI Shanshan   

  1. Institute of Social Work and Social Policy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China
  • Received:2025-11-19 Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-15

Abstract: As artificial intelligence, big data, and the Internet of Things are becoming increasingly embedded in social governance and public services, the traditional “human-centered” professional relationship in social work is facing systematic theoretical and practical challenges. The nonhuman turn that emerged in the late twentieth century provides important theoretical resources for social work to break through the constraints of anthropocentrism. Based on a review of the theoretical frameworks of posthumanism, actor-network theory, and new materialism, this article reconstructs and reflects upon the professional relationships in social work. Specifically, at the ontological level, professional relationships shift from a subject-centered interactional model to relational networks co-produced by multiple actors. At the epistemological level, knowledge production extends beyond its reliance on human experience and takes on a distributed character shaped jointly by data, algorithms, and material environments. And at the methodological level, practice shifts from linear intervention to relational engagement. However, this theoretical shift also brings practical challenges, including increased complexity and uncertainty, as well as the reconfiguration of professional identity and the blurring boundaries of ethical responsibility. It is therefore necessary to construct a “human–nonhuman coexistent” paradigm of professional relationships in order to respond to the professional crises, value reconstruction, and paradigm transformation of social work in the digital and intelligent era.

Key words: nonhuman turn, professional relationship in social work, “human–nonhuman coexistent” professional relationship

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] Perlman H H. Relationship: the heart of helping people[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018: 202.
[2] Biestek F P. An analysis of the casework relationship[J]. Social casework, 1954, 35(2): 57-61
[3] Alexander C, Charles G. Caring, mutuality and reciprocity in social worker: client relationships: rethinking principles of practice[J]. Journal of social work, 2009, 9(1): 5-22
[4] 区伟祥. 社会工作专业关系浅谈(上)[J]. 中国社会工作, 2017(16): 63
[5] 王思斌. 社会工作概论. 3版[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014: 12.
[6] 邱泽奇. 人机社会的治理转向[J]. 社会, 2025(3): 2-18,1
[7] 黄晨熹, 汪磊鑫. 数字社会工作的内涵、应用及其展望[J]. 河北学刊, 2025(3): 63-73
[8] 刘冰, 陈沐瑶. 数字社会工作: 实践进展、总体特征与未来议题[J]. 社会工作, 2024(6): 1-22,150-152
[9] 卜禾, 段文杰, 查皓钰. 人工智能与社会工作协作的演进逻辑与赋能路径[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(6): 56-66
[10] 文军, 陈宇涵. 人工智能社会工作情智融合发展的机遇与挑战[J]. 求索, 2025(2): 76-85
[11] Robson I. Improving sensemaking in social work: a worked example with Deleuze and Art[J]. Qualitative social work, 2021, 20(5): 1204-1222
[12] Afrouz R, Lucas J. A systematic review of technology-mediated social work practice: benefits, uncertainties, and future directions[J]. Journal of social work, 2023, 23(5): 953-974
[13] 文军. 西方社会学理论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013: 137-138.
[14] Bryant L, Williams C. Place and space in social work[J]. Qualitative social work, 2020, 19(3): 321-336
[15] Dominelli L. Anti oppressive social work theory and practice [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002: 28.
[16] Pyyhtinen O. More-than-human sociology: a new sociological imagination[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016: 63.
[17] Barad K. Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter[J]. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 2003, 28(3): 801-831
[18] Latour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005: 71, 84, 141, 247.
[19] 文军, 陈雪婧. 社区协同治理中的转译实践: 模式、困境及其超越——基于行动者网络理论的分析[J]. 社会科学, 2023(1): 141-152
[20] 邵任薇, 李露, 赵沛沛. 社会工作介入城中村儿童友好空间建设的行动逻辑研究——基于行动者网络理论[J]. 秘书, 2025(1): 37-47
[21] 康德. 纯粹理性批判[M]. 邓晓芒, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2017: 399-416.
[22] 笛卡尔. 笛卡尔主要哲学著作选[M]. 李琍, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2021: 126-141.
[23] 黄贺. 后人类主义的解构性与建构性[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2023-08-14.
[24] 唐娜?哈拉维. 类人猿、赛博格和女人: 自然的重塑[M]. 陈静, 译. 郑州: 河南大学出版社, 2016: 314-327.
[25] Badmington N. Theorizing posthumanism[J]. Cultural critique, 2003(53): 10-27
[26] Braidotti R. Posthuman humanities[J]. European educational research Journal, 2013, 12(1): 1-19
[27] 戴宇辰. “物”缘何行动?——拉图尔的“物之社会学”考察[J]. 社会学评论, 2023(2): 191-211
[28] 赵万里, 蒋钰卓. 数字智能时代的新唯物主义及其批判[J]. 天津社会科学, 2024(1): 23-31
[29] Bennett J. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things[M]. New York: Duke University Press, 2010: 10-13, 20.
[30] Barad K. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning[M]. New York: Duke University Press, 2007: 132-141.
[31] 郑作彧. 物—人关系的基本范畴: 新唯物主义社会学综论[J]. 社会学研究, 2023(2): 72-92,227-228
[32] 布鲁诺?拉图尔. 我们从未现代过: 对称性人类学论集[M]. 刘鹏, 安涅思, 译. 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 2022: 73-77.
[33] Pink S, Ferguson H, Kelly L. Digital social work: conceptualizing a hybrid anticipatory practice[J]. Qualitative social work, 2022, 21(2): 413-430
[34] 吴越菲. 反贫困社会工作的传统范式与当代面向——以“社会工作者—贫困者”专业关系为中心的考察[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2020(5): 22-29,68
[35] 杨超, 何雪松. 社会工作专业关系的“动态合宜”: 基于上海的质性研究[J]. 中国社会工作研究, 2017(2): 121-149,230
[36] 文军, 陈雪婧. 人工智能社会工作的理论意涵与现实挑战[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2025(1): 100-111,158-159
[37] Murphy D, Duggan M, Joseph S. Relationship-based social work and its compatibility with the person-centred approach: principled versus instrumental perspectives[J]. British journal of social work, 2013, 43(4): 703-719
[38] Ingram R, Smith M. Relationship-based practice: emergent themes in social work literature[J]. Institute for research and innovation in social services, 2018:1-15.
[39] 张和清. 专业的确信与后现代视角下的社会工作[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2003(3): 9-12
[40] 文军, 方淑敏. 从专业确信到模糊生成: 面向不确定性的社会工作知识生产及其反思[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(4): 84-94,180
[41] 范明林, 张芯桐. 社会工作专业关系建立与维系: 理论、实务与案例分析[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2024: 51.
[42] 李珊珊, 何雪松. 面向不确定性: 社会工作理论的新挑战[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(4): 116-125,181
[43] Tudor R, Barraclough S. Re-conceptualising agency in social work as socio-material, relational entanglements[J]. Social work & society, 2023, 21(1): 1-14
[44] Parton N. Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: from the “social” to the “informational”?[J]. British journal of social work, 2008, 38(2): 253-269
[45] Fenwick T, Landri P. Materialities, textures and pedagogies: socio-material assemblages in education[J]. Pedagogy, culture& society, 2012, 20(1): 1-7.
[46] 赵芳, 刘思彤. 数字化时代社会工作伦理的挑战与应对[J]. 社会工作, 2024(6): 23-47,152-153
[47] Reamer F G. Social work in a digital age: ethical and risk management challenges[J]. Social work, 2013, 58(2): 163-172
[48] Pascoe K M. Considerations for integrating technology into social work practice: a content analysis of nine professional social work associations’ Codes of Ethics[J]. International social work, 2023, 66(2): 298-312
[49] 赵万里, 谢榕. 数字不平等与社会分层: 信息沟通技术的社会不平等效应探析[J]. 科学与社会, 2020(1): 32-45
[50] 童敏, 辛峻青, 骆成俊. 专业关系与朋友关系: 一项社会工作历史视角的知识观考察[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019(5): 12-19
[51] 黄锐, 孙斐. 再识社会工作专业关系: 理论、实践与伦理的考量[J]. 社会工作, 2025(1): 41-64,154-157
[52] 文军. 重回“人”的新时代: 构建有生命力的社会学[J]. 社会科学, 2024(10): 184-199
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!