SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 71-80.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Theoretical Foundations, Core Characteristics and Practical Pathways of Evidence-Based Social Work Guidelines
ZHU Yumeng1, FU Fang1, CHI Iris2,3, BAI Zhenggang4,5
- 1. School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China;
2. Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, 90089;
3. Sau Po Centre on Aging, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China;
4. Institute of Clinical Research, Evidence Based Medicine Center of TCM, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China;
5. Campbell China Network Coordinator Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China
CLC Number:
- C916
| [1] 民政部.社会工作标准化技术委员会成立会议在京召开[EB/OL].(2013-12-30). http://laws.swchina.org/standard/2013/1230/3476.shtml. [2] 全国社会工作标准化技术委员会. 儿童社会工作服务指南: MZ/T 058-2014[EB/OL]. [2026-03-27]. https://std.samr.gov.cn/hb/search/stdHBDetailed?id=8B1827F18906BB19E05397BE0A0AB44A. [3] 全国社会工作标准化技术委员会. 老年社会工作服务指南: MZ/T 064-2016[EB/OL]. [2026-03-27]. https://std.samr.gov.cn/hb/search/stdHBDetailed?id=8B1827F221EBBB19E05397BE0A0AB44A. [4] 全国社会工作标准化技术委员会. 社区社会工作服务指南: MZ/T 071-2016[EB/OL]. [2026-03-27]. https://std.samr.gov.cn/hb/search/stdHBDetailed?id=8B1827F24350BB19E05397BE0A0AB44A. [5] 全国社会工作标准化技术委员会. 社会工作方法: 个案工作: MZ/T 094-2017[EB/OL]. [2026-03-27]. https://std.samr.gov.cn/hb/search/stdHBDetailed?id=8B1827F24C5BBB19E05397BE0A0AB44A. [6] 全国慈善事业和社会工作标准化技术委员会. 未成年人司法社会工作服务规范: GB/T 42380-2023 [EB/OL]. [2026-03-27]. https://std.samr.gov.cn/gb/search/gbDetailed?id=F78920660FD7B223E05397BE0A0AE533. [7] 赵玉琪, 潘俊霖, 李春萍, 等. 中国社会科学领域指南的现状与思考[J]. 循证研究, 2024(1): 1-18 [8] Global Social Service Standards Guideline Registration and Evidence-based Evaluation Platform (TRUST). Top 100 ranking list[EB/OL]. [2025-10-10]. http://www.truststandard.cn/inx/#/rank. [9] 拜争刚, 吴淑婷, 齐铱. 循证理念和方法在中国社会工作领域的应用现状分析[J]. 社会建设, 2017(4): 57-66 [10] 拜争刚, 齐铱, 杨克虎, 等. 循证社会科学的起源、现状及展望[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018(10): 1118-1121 [11] 张越伦, 吴东, 李乃适, 等. 试论循证医学的哲学基础[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2021(3): 401-406 [12] 汪子嵩, 范明生, 陈村富, 等. 希腊哲学史(第2卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2014: 418-419. [13] 杨文登. 社会工作的循证实践: 西方社会工作发展的新方向[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(2): 50-59 [14] 胡雁, 朱政, 傅亮, 等. 临床实践指南的发展与应用[J]. 中国护理管理, 2016, 16(9): 1156-1160 [15] Sign 50. A guideline developer’s handbook[EB/OL]. [2025-02-10].https://www.sign.ac.uk/what-we-do/methodology/sign-50-a-guideline-developers-handbook/. [16] Institute of Medicine(US). Clinical practice guidelines we can trust[M]. Washington(DC): National Academies Press, 2011: 15. [17] Global Social Service Standards Guideline Registration and Evidence-based Evaluation Platform (TRUST). Standards library[EB/OL]. [2026-01-13]. http://www.truststandard.cn/inx/#/search. [18] Nickerson R S. Reflections on reasoning[M]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. , 1986: 10-12. [19] Gambrill E. Evidence-based practice: an alternative to authority-based practice[J]. Families in society, 1999, 80(4): 341-350 [20] 董碧蓉, 岳冀蓉, 徐英. 制定循证指南的原则[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2006(2): 80-83 [21] Munz P. Our knowledge of the growth of knowledge[M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985: 72. [22] Claire S, Kristin L. Identifying social care research literature: case studies from guideline development[J]. Evidence based library and information practice, 2017, 12(3): 525-531 [23] Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis[J]. Qualitative health research, 2012, 22(10): 1435-1443 [24] GRADE wording group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations[J]. BMJ, 2004, 328(7454): 1490 [25] 苏仁凤, 玉炫, 史乾灵, 等. 证据合成方法学: 现状与发展[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2023(6): 1301-1309 [26] 李幼平, 刘雪梅. 系统评价的起源、发展和作用[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011(1): 2-6 [27] 黄崇斐, 拜争刚, 吴淑婷, 等. 定性系统评价的撰写方法介绍[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2015(9): 1106-1111 [28] Munn Z, Peters M D J, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach[J]. BMC medical research methodology, 2018(1): 143 [29] 苏珊, 何娜, 翟所迪. 临床实践指南更新的方法与思考[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2020(6): 26-30 [30] 陈耀龙, 王小琴, 吴琼芳, 等. 中国临床实践指南更新情况调查[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2014(2): 178-183 [31] Shekelle P, Eccles M P, Grimshaw J M, et al. When should clinical guidelines be updated?[J]. British medical journal, 2001, 323(7305): 155-157 [32] Becker M, Neugbauer E A M, Eikermann M. Partial updating of clinical practice guidelines often makes more sense than full updating: a systematic review on methods and the development of an updating procedure[J]. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014, 67(1): 33-45 [33] Goossen K, Bieler D, Hess S, et al. An adapted “Ottawa” method allowed assessing the need to update topic areas within clinical practice guidelines[J]. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022, 150: 1-11 [34] Akl E A, Meerpohl J J, Elliott J, et al. Living systematic reviews: 4. living guideline recommendations[J]. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017, 91: 47-53 [35] 拜争刚, 谷舒音, 陈昊, 等. 循证社会照护指南的制订方法及实例解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2024(1): 112-118 [36] 谷舒音, 拜争刚, 陈昊, 等. 循证社会干预指南与标准系列研究之二: 循证社会照护指南证据及推荐意见形成的方法分析[J]. 医学新知, 2024(2): 167-178 [37] Ren X, Lotfi T, Chen J, et al. Identifying actionable statements in Chinese health guidelines: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Evidence-based medicine, 2025, 30(5): 305-312 [38] 拜争刚, 朱雨萌, 陈昊, 等. 循证社会干预指南与标准系列研究之一: 基于循证理念制定标准[J]. 医学新知, 2024(1): 53-63 [39] Unrau Y A, Gabor P A, Grinnell R M. Evaluation in social work: the art and science of practice[M]. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007: 222-224. [40] Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines[J]. Annals of internal medicine, 2012, 156(7): 525 [41] Rosenfeld R M, Nnacheta L C, Corrigan M D. Clinical consensus statement development manual[J]. Otolaryngology: head and neck surgery, 2015, 153(2 Suppl): S1-S14. [42] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Developing NICE guidelines: the manual[EB/OL]. [2026-01-12]. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg20/chapter/glossary#developer. [43] 高一城, 刘芷含, 陶立元, 等. 健康公平性在指南制订中的思考与方法学建议[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2023(6): 1319-1324 [44] O’neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health[J]. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014, 67: 56-64 [45] Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews[M]. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 2017: 19-42. [46] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Social work with adults experiencing complex needs(NG216)[EB/OL]. [2025-04-15]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng216. [47] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guideline scope [EB/OL]. [2026-01-12]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng216/documents/final-scope. [48] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Social work with adults experiencing complex needs: evidence reviews for needs assessment. [EB/OL]. [2026-01-12]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng216/evidence/a-needs-assessment-pdf-11020106990. [49] 王娅妮, 张淑芳, 马雯雯, 等. 基于牛津证据等级评价中药治疗脑卒中的证据质量研究[J]. 世界科学技术—中医药现代化, 2018(7): 1238-1244 [50] Guyatt G H, Oxman A D, Vist G E, et al. Grade: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendation[J]. British medical journal, 2008, 336(7650): 924-926 [51] 曾宪涛, 冷卫东, 李胜, 等. 如何正确理解及使用GRADE系统[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011(9): 985-990 [52] 邓通, 汪洋, 黄笛, 等. 临床实践指南制订方法——GRADE方法理论篇[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2018(12): 1441-1445,1449 [53] Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann H J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. rating the quality of evidence[J]. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2011, 64(4): 401-406 [54] 拜争刚, 刘少堃, 黄崇斐, 等. 定性系统评价证据分级工具——CERQual简介[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2015(12): 1465-1470 [55] 汪洋. Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具简介[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019(11): 1322 [56] 王浩, 唐晓宇, 王和平, 等. ROBINS-I: 评估非随机干预性研究偏倚风险的新工具[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2018(7): 789-793 [57] 桂裕亮, 杨亮, 曾宪涛, 等. 临床实践指南制订方法——经济学证据在指南制订中的应用[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2018(11): 1285-1288 [58] 靳英辉, 邓通, 曾宪涛, 等. 临床实践指南制订方法——指南的实施与转化[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2019(9): 1040-1042, 1046 [59] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Social work with adults experiencing complex needs: supplement 2: economic searches[EB/OL]. [2026-01-12]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng216/evidence/supplement-2-economic-searches-pdf-11020109581. [60] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Membership of social work with adults experiencing complex needs[EB/OL]. [2026-01-12]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng216/documents/committee-member-list. [61] 席小华, 金超然. 社会工作服务标准建构的理论框架与实践路径——以《未成年人司法工作服务规范》研发为例[J]. 青少年犯罪问题, 2025(4): 134-146 [62] 何龙韬. 复杂实践情境下的社会工作循证研究体系: 从医学化到整体性[J]. 社会科学研究, 2025(6): 30-44 [63] 何雪松, 刘莉. 政府购买服务与社会工作的标准化——以上海的三个机构为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(2): 127-136, 179 [64] 梁娟娟. 标准化对养老机构社会工作发展有何作用——以广州市老人院为例[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(22): 20-21 [65] Gibbs L. Book review: developing practice guidelines for social work intervention: issues, methods, and research agenda[J]. Research on social work practice, 2005, 15(2): 137-139 [66] 朱雨萌, 盖琼艳, 陈昊, 等. 循证社会干预指南与标准系列研究之三: 基于循证理念推动标准科学实施[J]. 医学新知, 2024(4): 438-447 [67] 王春晖. 贯彻《养老机构社会工作服务规范》的几点建议[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(22): 25-26 [68] Robertson R. Globalisation or glocalisation?[J]. Journal of international communication, 1994(1): 33-52 [69] 沈黎, Campanini A. 全球在地化: 中国社会工作教育高质量发展的实践路径[J]. 南京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(5): 5-10 [70] 任文启. 走向循证: 未成年人司法社会工作发展的新动向[J]. 中国社会工作, 2023(12): 1 [71] 童峰, 杨轶, 喻成林. 循证社会工作介入老人长期照护模式研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2020(5): 62-68 [72] 梁露尹. 基于循证实践的社会工作介入残疾人社区康复研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会出版社, 2024: 1-10. [73] 公益时报. 山东青岛西海岸新区发布《“专业社工+志愿服务”基本规范》地方标准发布[EB/OL]. (2025-03-11). http://www.gongyishibao.com/newdzb/html/2025-03/11/content_3464906.html. |
|
||