我国社会服务项目的鉴定性评估及其国际视野下的反思

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 自从我国确立社会主义和谐社会的建设目标、提出改进政府公共服务供给方式的要求以来，我国社会服务高速发展，其评估问题愈益引起重视。不同于国际社会服务项目的评估实践，我国当前的主流评估方式是鉴定性评估。在从国际视野分析鉴定性评估在评估发展中的地位以及当前国际项目评估经验性和循证性特征的基础上，提出在继续借鉴鉴定性评估方式加强社会服务项目的准入性管理的同时，当前尤其要加大对项目生命周期的循证性评估，提升评估在社会服务项目成效评价中的作用。

关键词: 社会服务项目, 鉴定性评估, 国际视野, 反思

Abstract: Since setting the goal of building a socialist harmonious society and the central government’s request to improve public services provision, social services in China have developed rapidly, and their evaluation issues have also attracted more and more attention. Different from the evaluation practice of international social service programs, the current mainstream evaluation method in China is accreditation. On the basis of review on the status of accreditation in the evaluation, as well as the empirical and evidence-based characteristics of current international program evaluation from an international perspective, this article proposes to strengthen the access management of social service programs by means of accreditation of its subject, promote the evidence-based evaluation on the whole program life course, and enhance its role in the evaluation of the effectiveness of social service programs.

Key words: social service program, accreditation, international perspective, reflection

中图分类号:

C916

方巍. 我国社会服务项目的鉴定性评估及其国际视野下的反思[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2021, 21(5): 25-32.

FANG Wei. Accreditation of Social Service Program: Current Situation in China and Its Reflection from an International Perspective[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(5): 25-32.

参考文献

[1] SCHALOCK R L, et al. An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning[J]. Evaluation and program planning, 2014(45): 110-118
[2] 罗伊斯, 赛义, 帕吉特. 项目评估: 循证方法导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2018: 1-402.
[3] WEISS C H. Theory-based evaluation: past, present, and future[J]. New directions for evaluation, 1997(76): 41-55
[4] CORYN C L S, NOAKES L A, WESTINE C D, et. al. A Systematic Review of Theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009[J]. American journal of evaluation, 2011, 32(2): 199-226
[5] 叶托, 胡税根. 政府购买社会服务的绩效评估指标体系研究——基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的应用[J]. 广东行政学院学报, 2015(4): 5-13, 45
[6] 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典(第五版)[M], 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005: 673.
[7] 黄佳豪. 地方政府购买居家养老服务评估研究——以合肥为例[J]. 理论与改革, 2016(2): 98-101
[8] 童峰, 刘金华. 浅谈养老服务评估指标体系的建构[J]. 学术论坛, 2015(12): 127-130
[9] 韩江风. 政府购买服务中第三方评估的内卷化及其优化——以Z市S区社会工作服务评估项目为例[J]. 四川理工学院学报(社会科学版), 2019(2): 20-37
[10] GILBERT N, TERRELL P. Dimensions of social welfare policy[M]. Boston: Pearson, 2013.
[11] GINSBERG L. H. 社会工作评估——原理与方法[M]. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2005: 45-92.
[12] 肖瓅, 程玉兰, 马昱等. Delphi 法在筛选中国公众健康素养评价指标中的应用研究[J]. 中国健康教育, 2008(2): 81-84
[13] 田甜, 力晓蓉, 应桂英. Delphi 法筛选四川省实用新农合统计指标的应用[J]. 卫生软科学, 2012(10): 844-847
[14] 廖琦, 桂金艳. Delphi 法在护理专业中的应用进展[J]. 护理研究, 2015(3): 269-271
[15] 杨怀洁, 杨成良, 王青丽. Delphi 法在护理研究中的应用现状[J]. 现代临床医学, 2015(3): 166-167, 171
[16] 范柏乃. 我国城市居民生活质量评价体系的构建与实际测度[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2006(4): 122-131
[17] MERTENS D M, WILSONA T. Program evaluation theory and practice: a comprehensive guide[M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 2019: 1-621.
[18] 罗希, 李普希, 弗里曼. 评估: 方法与技术[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2007: 1-22.
[19] 罗伊斯, 赛义, 帕吉特, 等. 公共项目评估导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2007: 1-362.
[20] 古贝, 林肯. 第四代评估[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008: 1-233.
[21] 方巍. 社会项目评估研究发展趋势与启示[J]. 社会工作, 2010(6): 4-9
[22] 范斌, 张海. 社会服务评估发展的历史性观察[J]. 理论月刊, 2014(3): 5-11
[23] 方巍, 祝建华, 何铨. 社会项目评估(第二版)[M]. 上海: 格致出版社, 上海人民出版社. 2020: 9-10, 164.
[24] KODA-KIMBLE M A, PHARM D, SPEEDIE M K. Accreditation: we want standards, not standardization[J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2009, 29(5): 491-494
[25] JANSEN R T P. Accreditation in the european union: where we are, where should we go[J]. Journal of the association for laboratory automation, 1999, 4(4): 74-74
[26] MOHD SAID S, et al. Accreditation of engineering programs: an evaluation of current practices in malaysia[J]. International journal technology design education, 2013, 23(2): 313-328
[27] BARRETT B, FERNANDEZ F, GONZALEZ E M. Why universities voluntarily pursue us accreditation: the case of Mexico[EB/OL]. [2019-09-25]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00427-y.
[28] STOESZ D, KARGERH J. Reinventing social work accreditation[J]. Research on social work practice, 2009, 19(1): 104-111
[29] FELDMAN R A. “Reinventing social work accreditation”: write on![J]. Research on social work practice, 2009, 19(1): 124-126
[30] MIDGLEY J. Comments on “reinventing social work accreditation”[J]. Research on social work practice, 2009, 19(1): 119-121
[31] SCRIVENS E. A Taxonomy of the dimensions of accreditation system[J]. Social policy and administration, 1996, 30(2): 114-124
[32] TOUATI N, POMEY M P. Accreditation at a crossroads: are we on the right track?[J]. Health policy, 2009, 90(2&3): 156-165
[33] WEINBACH R W. Evaluating social work services and programs[M]. Boston: Pearson Evaluating, 2005: 1-249.
[34] DUDLEY J R. Social work evaluation: enhancing what we do[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013: 1-366.
[35] GRINNELL R M JR, GABOR P A, UNRAU Y A. Program evaluation for social workers: foundations of evidence-based programs[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019: 1-464.
[36] GUBA E S, LINCOLN Y S. Fourth generation evaluation[M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989: 1-296.
[37] 方巍. 循证社会工作的本土化与本土社会工作的国际化——关于循证实践的服务模式转型及思想渊源的思考[C]//顾东辉. 社会工作评论(第二辑). 上海: 上海人民出版社. 2017, 23-34.
[38] 李幼平, 李静, 孙鑫, 等. 循证医学在中国的发展: 回顾与展望[J]. 兰州大学学报(医学版), 2016(1): 25-28
[39] SATTERFIELD J M, et al. Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice[J]. The milbank quarterly, 2009, 87(2): 368-390
[40] FITZ-GIBBON C T, MORRIS L L. Theory-based evaluation[J]. Evaluation practice, 1996, 17(2): 177-184
[41] BRICKMAYER J D, WEISS C H. Theory-based evaluation in practice: what do we learn?[J]. Evaluation review, 2000, 24(4): 407-431
[42] CHEN H T. Theory-driven evaluations[M]. California: SAGE Publications, 1990: 1-326.
[43] 方巍. 项目理论与社会福利服务及评估专业化[C]//中国社会工作研究(第七辑). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2010, 99-108.
[44] 方巍. 居家养老服项目理论评估——以杭州市下城区天水街道为例[C]//浙江省民政厅. 浙江民政政策理论研究. 杭州: 杭州出版社, 2011, 589-597.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed