SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 5-11.

    Next Articles

Rethinking theTernary Relationship between Purchasers, Service Providers and Users from the Problems in the Process of Purchase of Service Contracting: Taking Guangzhou as an Example

DING Yu, XIAO Reng   

  1. School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510275, China
  • Received:2016-10-19 Online:2017-03-15 Published:2017-03-15

Abstract:

The practice of Purchase of Service Contracting (POSC) in Guangzhou for over ten years reveals three main problems in the whole POSC process, namely, unsophisticated institutionalization, professionalization and funding structure. These problems yield various other problems from the purchasers, service providers and users perspectives, limiting the orderly and effective development of POSC. Through reflection, these problems and issues are intertwined to affect the whole POSC process. The relationship among the purchasers, service providers and users is not linear and top-down, but a kind of three-cored, multilateral, and multidimensional relationship.

Key words: purchase of service contracting, social work, relationship between purchasers, service providers and users

CLC Number: 

  • C916

[1] HODGE G A. Privatization:an international review of performance[M]. Westview Pr, 2000:.
[2] 雷杰,罗观翠,段鹏飞,等. 广州市政府购买家庭综合服务分析研究[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015.
[3] 马贵侠,叶士华. 政府向社会工作机构购买服务的运作机制、困境及前瞻[J]. 广东工业大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1):49-55.
[4] 陈琴. 政府购买社工服务的实践分析与困境研究:以A区“社区服务中心”为个案[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学,2014.
[5] 邰鹏峰. 政府购买公共服务的监管成效、困境与反思:基于内地公共服务现状的实证研究[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(1):95-99.
[6] 王瑞鸿. 政府购买社工服务中的多元视角[J]. 中国社会工作,2015(22):6.
[7] 马晓晗. 政府购买社工服务,顶层设计还需再突破[J]. 中国社会工作,2015(19):16-20.
[8] 陈建国. 政府购买公共服务的过程管理研究——基于北京市的案例分析[J]. 理论探索,2012(4):115-119.
[9] 王冠. 政府购买服务的三元关系探讨[J]. 山西师大学报(社会科学版),2011(6):55-58.
[10] 李卫湘. 广东:规范民政领域政府购买和资助社工服务[J]. 中国社会工作,2013(30):36-37.
[11] 张弘力,林桂凤,夏先德. 论中央对地方专项拨款[J]. 财政研究,2000(5):16-20.
[12] 彭凯健. 社会工作协会、社工机构和政府互动关系研究[D]. 西安:西北农林科技大学,2015.
[13] 黄光星. 政府购买服务机制还有待改善[J]. 中国社会工作,2013(22):61.
[14] 肖光坤. 拓展公共服务政府购买范围的法治化思考[J]. 企业导报,2015(7):1-4.
[15] 许小玲. 政府购买服务: 现状、问题与前景——基于内地社会组织的实证研究[J]. 思想战线 2012,38(2):75-78.
[16] 吴世坤. 合谋的制衡:以激励性规制理论优化地方政府与社工组织关系[J]. 重庆行政:公共论坛,2015(5):66-67.
[17] 武婉娴. 人本治疗视角下社工的需要[J]. 中国社会工作,2014(25):30-31.
[18] 顾江霞. 政府购买服务契约的权力运作逻辑——基于珠三角B市购买社会服务的研究[J]. 招标与投标,2013(5):34-41.
粤持证社工数5年增3.5万[EB/OL].[2016-01-30].http://www.gzmz.gov.cn/gzsmzj/mtgz/201601/4770c201029d43a5ac60779d11871060.shtml.
[20] 数说社工[N]. 广州日报,2015-01-19.
[21] MOESBY-JENSEN C K, H S NIELSON. Emotional labor in social workers’ practice[J]. European journal of social work, 2015(5): 690-702.
[22] 杨梨. 政府购买服务:民办社工机构的困境与对策[J]. 社会工作与管理,2014(2): 28-33.
[23] 汪昊. 机构承接购买服务操作之难[J]. 中国社会工作,2015(19):25-26.
[24] 张琰. 社会转型期民办社工机构介入社区的障碍分析: 以济南A服务社、B服务社为例[D]. 济南:山东建筑大学,2011.
[25] 卢磊. 民办社工服务机构发展中的十个反思[J]. 中国社会工作,2014(4): 28-30.
[26] 李伟峰. 双重制度逻辑下企业社会工作的发展:一个新制度主义视角的解析[D]. 北京:中国社会科学院研究生院,2012.
[27] 李越. 深圳市政府购买岗位社会工作服务的问题与对策研究[D]. 福建师范大学,2013.
[28] 徐盈艳,黄晓星. 促成与约制:制度嵌入性视角下的社会组织发展——基于广东五市政府购买社会工作服务的实践[J]. 新视野,2015(5):74-78.
[29] 黎熙元,徐盈艳. 政府购买服务规制下的社会工作机构发展:广东四个城市试点项目的比较研究[J]. 当代港澳研究,2012(4):15-23.
[30] 洪鉴铨. 把控财务风险做个“三好”学生[J]. 中国社会工作,2015(6):44-45.
[31] 龙凌. 以项目社工为依托的社区服务中心“嵌入式”运营研究:以深圳市W社区服务中心为例[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2013.
[32] 黄岚. 上海市中心城区养老服务社会化的现状、问题与对策思考[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2007.
[33] 邓金霞. 政府购买公共服务的“委托管理”模式:基于上海两个典范社区文化活动中心的经验[J]. 中国政府采购,2015(9):44-46.
[34] 姚迈新. 政社关系视角下社会组织提供公共服务问题研究[J]. 岭南学刊,2013(3): 121-126.
[35] 费梅苹. 政府购买社会工作服务中的基层政社关系研究[J]. 社会科学,2014(6):74-83.
[36] 彭少峰,张昱. 迈向“契约化”的政社合作——中国政府向社会力量购买服务之研究[J]. 内蒙古社会科学,2014(35):161-166.
[37] 范燕宁. 政府购买公共服务“双主体”政策背景下 社会工作专业机构面临的机遇与挑战[J]. 社会工作,2013(5):91.
[38] 郁建兴、瞿志远.公私合作伙伴中的主体间关系:基于两个居家养老服务案例的研究[J]. 经济社会体制比 较, 2011(4):109-117.
[39] 梁宵. 论公共服务购买:政府与社会组织伙伴关系的建构[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2013(10):24-26.
[40] 王才章. 政府购买公共服务中政府与社会组织的关系——一个组织社会学的新制度主义视角[J]. 学术论坛, 2016(3):62-66.

[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[11] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[12] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[13] YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[14] HE Xuesong, WANG Tianqi. 2021 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
[15] HE Jian, LAN Caiguang. Help Others by Mutual Assistance VS. Help Others to Self-Reliance: A New Interpretation of the Localization of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 16-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!