SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 58-63.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

An Integrated Absorption: Mechanism Innovation of Foreign NGOs Management and Its Practice

ZHAO Huan1,2, GAO Li1,2   

  1. 1. School of Social and Public Management, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China;
    2. Institute of Social Work and Social Policy, University Think Tank of Shanghai, Shanghai, 200237, China
  • Received:2016-12-16 Online:2017-03-15 Published:2017-03-15

Abstract:

It is the promulgating of Management Act on Activities within the Territory of Foreign NGOs that brings the foreign NGOs activities in China into the legal orbit. However, in response to the plight of the legality of foreign NGOs, meanwhile, there are some practical problems, including lacking of implementation details, obsolete the management concepts, limited talent and the upgrading of difficulties in monitoring and so on, which is inseparable with the long-standing management system based on regulation. Combined with the new historical situation, this paper attempts to present a shift from the control-oriented management toward an integrated absorption, which should become a mechanism innovation in the management of foreign NGOs. And on this basis, the paper proposes the trinity of practice, that is, construction of legalization as an administrative building, flexible administration as an administrative method and social governance as an administrative innovation, to promote the healthy and orderly development of foreign NGOs in China.

Key words: integrated absorption, government management of foreign NGOs, construction of legalization, flexible administration, social governance

CLC Number: 

  • C916

[1] 十二届全国人大常委会第二十次会议.我国出台境外非政府组织境内活动管理法[EB/OL]. (2016-04-28). http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2016-04/28/c_1118765535.htm.
[2] 朱志梅. 柔性执法与社会组织监管机制的创新[J]. 河北法学,2014(2): 119-121.
[3] 王存奎,彭爱丽. 境外非政府组织在华运行现状及管理对策——以维护国家政治安全为视角[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1): 125-126.
[4] SCHMITTER P C. Still the century of corporatism?[J]. The review of politics, 1974(36): 85-131.
[5] 邓正来,丁轶. 监护型控制逻辑下的有效治理——对近三十年国家社团管理政策演变的考察[J]. 学术界,2012(3):5-21.
[6] 王丽娟,慕良泽. 在华境外非政府组织管理研究[J]. 河北学刊,2015(1):165-166.
[7] 陈晓春,施卓宏. 在华境外非政府组织的分类管理探析[J]. 中国行政管理,2014(3):48-51.
[8] 康晓光,韩恒. 分类控制当前中国大陆国家与社会关系研究[J]. 社会学研究,2005(6):73-88.
[9] 康晓光,韩恒. 行政吸纳社会——当代中国大陆国家与社会关系的再研究[J]. Social science in China,2007(2):116-125.
[10] 江华,张建民. 利益契合:转型期中国国家与社会关系的一个分析框架——以行业组织政策参与为案例[J]. 社会学研究,2011(3):136-152.
[11] 田凯. 发展与控制之间:中国政府部门管理社会组织的策略变革[J]. 河北学刊,2016(2):171-173.
[12] 敬乂嘉. 控制与赋权:中国政府的社会组织发展策略[J]. 学海,2016(1):22-31.
[13] 关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定[N],人民日报,2014-10-29(01).
[14] 李立国. 以法治建设引领和规范民政事业发展[J]. 求是,2015(4):9-11.
[15] 侯登华,李双. 试论行政柔性执法的理论基础[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2010(4):81-84.
[16] 王春业. 论柔性执法[J]. 中共中央党校学报,2007(5):50-54.
[17] 徐永祥. 社会的再组织化:现阶段社会管理与社会服务的重要课题[J]. 教学与研究,2008(1):24-29.
[18] 李丹萍,张玲. 境外非政府组织评估:功能、定位与评估体系[J]. 行政论坛,2014(4):85-88.

[1] CHEN Jing. External and Internal Forces: Analysis of Access to Opportunities for Social Organizations to Participate in Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(1): 69-77.
[2] ZHUO Caiqin, ZHANG Xuehui, ZHANG Qianxin. The Path of Social Organizations for the Disabled to Participate in Social Governance: A Case Study Based on Guangdong Association of the Blind [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 50-60.
[3] GUO Weihe. Study on the Relationship between State Governance and Community Governance and Modernization of Their Coordinated Evolution [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 5-15.
[4] WANG Tianxia. Village Elites, Farmers’ Self-Organization and Rural Social Governance Path Innovation: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spring Festival Evening of Villagers in A Village [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(3): 84-91,100.
[5] HUANG Qinglin. Disease, Rumours and the Social Governance of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao in Late 19th Centutry [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 79-85,92.
[6] YIN Pingjun, HUANG Wenlin. Construction of Educational Welfare System for New Generation Migrant Workers: From the Perspectives of Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 81-91.
[7] TANG Yong. Hospice Care and Social Governance Innovation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(4): 46-53,74.
[8] REN Wenqi. Judicial Social Work: The Return and Development of People's Mediation in the New Era [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(3): 5-11,27.
[9] CAI Xiang, CHEN Sheying. NGO and Social Development: Social Organization, Community Building and Grassroots Social Governance in the Post-Economic State Era [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(3): 72-77.
[10] LU Wengang, WANG Yaxuan. Response to Social Organization Trust Crisis and Brand Reconstruction from the Perspective of Social Governance: Based on the Theory of Disaster Causes [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 45-54.
[11] SUN Kuili, WANG Guoyou, ZENG Minrui. A Study of Community-Social Organization -Social Worker Combined Interaction in the Context of Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 55-62.
[12] CHEN Weizhi. The Construction, Characteristics and Significance of Governance Discourse System of the Ruling Party in the New Period [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(5): 85-90.
[13] CHEN Rui, SUN Jing. A Study on the Cooperation Mode between Private Social Work Organizations and Government from the Perspective of the Social Governance: Taking Government-Social Work Organization Cooperation in Anhui Province as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(2): 78-82.
[14] LI Bin, WANG Yi-Fei. Toward a Cooperative Social Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 15(1): 21-26.
[15] LIAO Hong-Bing. Analysis on the Significance and Developing Strategy of Establishment of Social Work Organization by College Teachers [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 15(1): 10-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!