SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 75-81.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Participation of British and American Social Workers in the Welfare Care System for Vulnerable Children and its Enlightenment: From the Perspective of Technocracy

TAN Lei   

  1. School of Politics and Law, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510090, China
  • Received:2017-11-21 Online:2018-07-15 Published:2018-07-13

Abstract: The social services for the vulnerable children in U.K and U.S.A are based on the Demand classifications. The social services include various services for the looked-after children, the leaving children, the disabled children accessing short breaks and the homeless children, and the social workers have unique advantages, such as individualization, precision, emergency, and moral motivation.the concept of technocracy is obvious during the assessment on the social work service for the vulnerable children. However, there are shortcomings for the technocracy, such as lacking of individualization and overall response, the neglect of ethics, and bothering service objects. There are three implications of the perspective of technocracy on the development of the social work in China. Recognizing the disadvantages of putting too much emphasis on scientific methods and index and balance the scientific and artistic quality of the profession, strengthening the participation of the demand side in the assessment process and giving more professional support and multiple care to the front-line social workers in China.

Key words: vulnerable children, social worker, technocracy

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] LISA HOLMES, SAMANTHA MCDERMID. Understanding costs and outcomes in child welfare services:a comprehension costing approach to managing your resources[M]. London:Jessica Kingsley Pblishers, 2012.
[2] ELEANOR H AYER. Homeless children[M]. New York:Lucent Books, 1997.
[3] LAURA K EGENDORF. Poverty:opposing viewpoints[M]. San Diego:Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1999:166-169.
[4] 刘永谋. 技术治理主义:批评与辩护[N]. 光明日报, 2017-02-20.
[5] 张丙宣. 技术治理的两副面孔[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2017(9):28-32.
[6] DIANA LEAT. Philanthropic foundation, public good and public policy[M]. London:Macmillan Publishers Ltd., 2016:36.
[7] 黄晓春, 嵇欣. 技术治理的极限及其超越[J]. 社会科学, 2016(11):72.
[8] 卢文洁. 广州市社工已过万人[N]. 广州日报, 2017-10-25.
[1] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[2] CHENG Shiting, ZHANG Wei, XIE Shiyu. Retention of Front-Line Social Workers: Utility Analysis of the Mediation of Family Support [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 52-60.
[3] GAO Yiduo. The Complex Inner World: Research on Social Workers’ Emotional Labor Process [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(1): 41-49.
[4] YU Tieshan. Pendulum Development: The Number of Community Full-Time Social Workers and Its Influencing Factors: An Empirical Study Based on CLDS2014 and CLDS2016 Data [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 63-70,79.
[5] ZHOU Yongkang, CHEN Shuang. A Study of Local Social Workers’ Relationship with Colleagues Under the Background of Chinese Culture [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(1): 54-63.
[6] ZENG Shouchui, LI Xiao, HE Xuesong. Social Workers’ Turnover: Difference between Intention and Action [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(5): 14-21.
[7] HUANG Jun, CHEN Ling. Problems and Solutions for Family Guardianship of Disadvantaged Children: Based on the Survey in City J [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(3): 30-36.
[8] ZHOU Ling, DU Juan. Current Status and Influencing Factors of Financial Literacy of Chinese NGO Workers: Based on the Results of 956 Questionnaires in 31 provinces, City and Autonompus Region in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(2): 32-40.
[9] CHEN Lin, XING Jie, MAO Xupeng. Social Workers in the Integrated Medical and Elderly Care Service Development: Dilemmas and Causes [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 56-63,71.
[10] GU Jiang-xia. Exploring the Forming Process of “Community, Social Organizations and Social Workers” Joint Action Mechanism in Urban Community: Based on the Experience of a Pilot Plan in S City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 86-92.
[11] XU Xiaoyun. Prevention of Aging and Intervention of Social Workers: Social Participation of the Elders from the Perspective of Active Aging [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(5): 52-60.
[12] SUN Zhongwei, ZHOU Haiyan. Work Conditions, Family Support and Professional Development: Multi-factor Analysis of Chinese Social Workers' Turnover Intention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(4): 29-36.
[13] WANG Jinwen. Social Workers Going to the Countryside: The Subject Practice of Rural Social Governance in New Era [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(4): 80-88.
[14] GUO Hao, ZHANG Zhiyin. Study on the Image of Social Workers and Its Shaping Factors: Based on the Survey Data of Guangzhou and Shenzhen Residents [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(6): 45-51.
[15] LIU Xiaoqing, HE Jian. Discussion on the Relationship between the Marketization of Resources and the Action Predicament of Social Workers [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(4): 40-45,59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!