SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 73-80,104.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Double Variation of Legitimacy and Autonomy of Community Grassroots Organizations: Based on the Analysis of J Community C Fitness Team in Wuhan

XU Qin   

  1. School of Politics and International Relations, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430079, China
  • Received:2018-01-08 Online:2019-01-15 Published:2019-01-04

PDF (PC)

2209

Abstract: In the area of community cultural governance, due to the impact of the national "external mobilization" and "internal demand", community grassroots organizations have gone through the evolution path of "germination", "development" and "maturity". In the process of evolution of community grassroots organizations, legitimacy and autonomy are two aspects of their growth:on the one hand, the grass-roots organizations build legitimacy for themselves in their daily operations; on the other hand, it keeps the autonomy of the organization. In the community, grassroots organizations have dual variations of legitimacy and autonomy, and it reflects the theoretical logic of government embedding and social autonomy. To crack down on the growth of community grassroots organizations, it needs to construct the governance pattern of benign interaction between government and society, and explore the balance mechanism of government embedding and social autonomy.

Key words: community grassroots organizations, legitimacy, autonomy, community governance

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 中华人民共和国民政部. 2015年社会服务发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2016-07-20).http://www.mca.gov.cn/artical/sj/tjgb/201607/20160700001136.shtml.
[2] 葛道顺. 中国社会组织发展:从社会主体到国家意识[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2011(3):19
[3] 马庆钰, 贾西津. 中国社会组织的发展方向与未来趋势[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2015(4):62
[4] 黄晓春. 当代中国社会组织的制度环境与发展[J]. 中国社会科学, 2015(9):146
[5] 纪莺莺. 当代中国的社会组织:理论视角与经验研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(5):219
[6] 管兵. 城市政府结构与社会组织发育[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(4):129.
[7] 崔月琴, 沙艳. 社会组织的发育路径及其治理结构转型[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2015(10):131
[8] 何艳玲, 周晓峰, 张鹏举. 边缘草根组织的行动策略及解释[J]. 公共管理学报, 2009(1):48
[9] 杨海涛. 民间公共组织的演进逻辑[J]. 社会科学研究, 2015(5):130
[10] 乔运鸿, 龚志文. 资源依赖理论与乡村草根组织的健康发展——以山西永济蒲韩乡村社区实践为例[J]. 理论探索, 2017(1):99.
[11] 李伟. 社会组织建设:现实、挑战与前景[M]. 北京:中国发展出版社, 2011:176-203.
[12] 高丙中. 社会团体的合法性问题[J]. 中国社会科学, 2000(2):100.
[13] 马克斯·韦伯. 经济与社会(上)[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 1997:78.
[14] 朱莉·费希尔. NGO与第三世界的政治发展[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2002:74-103.
[15] 汪锦军. 嵌入与自治:社会治理中的政社关系再平衡[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(2):73
[16] 胡薇. 双轨制:中国社会组织发展的现实路径分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013(6):20
[1] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[2] TONG Min, ZHOU Xiaotong. Social Healing: A Hope-Implanted Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(5): 5-13.
[3] GUO Weihe. Study on the Relationship between State Governance and Community Governance and Modernization of Their Coordinated Evolution [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 5-15.
[4] FANG Yaming, ZHOU Wenyi, HUANG Jianxu. Insertion of Social Work Forces into the Construction of Rural Communities [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 80-88,98.
[5] ZHANG Chao, ZHANG Jiayuan. Employee Expectations, Organizational Accountability and Legitimacy: The Establishment of Internal Legitimacy in Social Service Organizations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(2): 68-75,84.
[6] LI Ling'ou. Hierarchical Governance and Organizational Legitimacy: The Dual Logic and Realization Methods for Social Organizations to Coordinate Response to Emergencies [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(6): 78-88.
[7] LIU Jie, XIE Guimei, ZOU Ying. Reasons for the Alienation of Medical Social Work Department: A Case Study Based on H Hospital in F Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(5): 30-41.
[8] YUAN Ming. Potential Pitfalls of Chinese Government Purchase of Service and Its Countermeasures [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(1): 82-87,94.
[9] GUO Liqiang, GUO Weihe. Promoting Legitimacy through Professionalization: A Case Study of the Participation of Professional Community Workers in the Party Building in the Community [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(4): 37-47.
[10] WEI Jiupeng. Double Variations: Disintegration and Construction of “Legalization” in “Administration”: An Empirical Narration Based on Competition for Activities Space in A Community in Wuhan [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(2): 70-76.
[11] YU Tieshan. Towards Effective Governance: Institutional Logic and Practical Strategy of Community Governance: A Case Study Based on S City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 62-67,97.
[12] TAN Xia, LIN Yigang. Research on the Path of International Community Governance from the Strength Perspective: Taking Chongqing Hongyan Community as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(1): 68-72.
[13] Huang Haiping. Reconstruction of Confucian Cultural Capital in Urban Community Governance [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(5): 61-66.
[14] LIU Zhen, ZHU Zhiwei. Objectives and Structure: Typological Analysis of Community Social Organizations [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(2): 72-77.
[15] MENG Yi, XU Xian. Help People to Help Themselves and Community Governance: A Historical Implication from the UK [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 75-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Social Work and Management
Add：729 East Dongfeng RD., Guangzhou PRC.
Tel：020-37627489 Fax：020-37626653 Email：shgzygl@gdut.edu.cn
Supported:Beijing Magtech