SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 23-31.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Agents and Space Production: The Practice Logic of Social Organizations Participating in the Community Green Governance——Based on the Practice of W Organization

GAO Li   

  1. Social and Public Administration School, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China
  • Received:2018-11-19 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-15

Abstract: From the perspective of third-party evaluators, this paper takes the professional practice of W organization's participation in the green governance of urban communities in H district as a case study. While critically reflecting on the previous theories, the paper constructs an analytical perspective of agents and space production based on the theory of "interests alignment and organizational action", so as to explore in depth the micro-mechanism and the inherent operating logic of social organizations' participation in the practices of community green governance. The study finds that in the practice of promoting community green governance, while confronted with the governance scenarios of weak community participation, limited motivation and community relationship alienation under the strong administrative governance, W organization actively promotes down-top, resident-led community green governance actions from the three aspects of "cognition", "empowerment" and "community building", thus directly promoting the restructuring of community elements, the reshaping of community public space, the cultivation of community spirit, and the reconstruction of social networks. In this way participation motivation of the agents has been shifted from the self-interested participation in the interest alignment mode to the altruistic governance of the organizational action mode, thus truly forming a community-based green governance community.

Key words: community green governance, agents, public space production, a community for communal life

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 冉连. 绿色治理:变迁逻辑、政策反思与展望-基于1978-2016年政策文本分析[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(6):9-17
[2] 刘东国.绿党政治[M]. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社, 2002:2.
[3] 弗·卡普拉, 等.绿色政治:全球的希望[M]. 石音, 译.北京:东方出版社, 1988:28.
[4] 杨立华, 刘宏福. 绿色治理:建设美丽中国的必由之路[J]. 中国行政管理, 2014(11):6-12
[5] 苑琳, 崔煊岳. 政府绿色治理创新:内涵、形势与战略选择[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(11):151-154
[6] STEPHANIE PANE HADEN, JENNIFER D, OYLER, JOHN D. Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management:an exploratory analysis[J]. Management Decision, 2009, 47(7):1041-1055
[7] BABACAR DIENG, YVON PESQUEUX. On "green governance"[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2017, 20(1/2):111-123
[8] 李元祯, 牛晓飞, 武立东, 等. 绿色治理与治理转型——第九届公司治理国际研讨会综述[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017(5):185-192
[9] 史云贵, 刘晓燕. 县级政府绿色治理体系的构建及其运行论析[J]. 社会科学研究, 2018(1):81-88
[10] 廖小东, 史军. 绿色治理:一种新的分析框架[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6):172-173
[11] 杨立华, 刘宏福. 绿色治理:建设美丽中国的必由之路[J]. 中国行政管理, 2014(11):6-12
[12] 史云贵, 刘晓燕. 县级政府绿色治理体系的构建及其运行论析[J]. 社会科学研究, 2018(1):81-88
[13] 南开大学绿色治理准则课题组. 《绿色治理准则》及其解说[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017(5):4-22
[14] 蒋显荣, 郭霞. 居民经验知识与城市绿色治理[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2017(2):114-118
[15] 王晨. 新合作主义视域下的公民参与城市社区治理——基于德国城市绿色空间治理的思考[J]. 理论探讨, 2015(3):163-166
[16] 廖小东, 史军. 西部地区绿色治理的机制研究——以贵州为例[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2016(5):101-111
[17] 杨艺, 宋晓维. 农村绿色治理能力建设研究——以农村生活垃圾处理为例[J]. 学习与实践, 2016(8):115-118
[18] 阿兰纳·伯兰德, 朱健刚. 公众参与与社区公共空间的生产-对绿色社区建设的个案研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2007(4):118-136
[19] 刘中起. 基层社区动员的框架整合:凌云"绿主妇"个案研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(5):40-49
[20] 安东尼·吉登斯. 社会的构成[M]. 李康, 李猛, 译. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1998:89.
[21] 埃哈尔·费埃德伯格. 权力与规则——组织行动的动力[M]. 张月, 等, 译. 上海:格致出版社、上海人民出版社, 2008:287-297.
[22] 桂勇.邻里空间:城市基层的行动、组织与互动[M]. 上海:上海世纪出版集团, 2008:10-20.
[23] 亨利·列斐伏尔. 空间:社会产物与使用价值. 现代性与空间的生产[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社, 2003:47.
[24] 杨敏. 作为国家治理单元的社区——对城市社区建设运动过程中居民社区参与和社区认知的个案研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2007(4):137-264
[25] 江华, 张建民, 周莹. 利益契合:转型期中国国家与社会关系的一个分析框架——以行业组织政策参与为案例[J]. 社会学研究, 2011(3):136-152
[26] 徐选国. 社会理性与城市基层治理社会化的视角转换——基于上海梅村的"三社联动"实践[J]. 社会建设, 2017(6):5-15
[27] 谢舜, 周鸿. 科尔曼理性选择理论评述[J]. 思想战线, 2005(2):70-73
[28] 高丽, 于梦娇, 赵环. 全球化背景下的生态议题与社会工作的绿色转向[J]. 新视野, 2018(4):69-75
[1] LUO Qiao, TANG Haoran. Value Reconstruction, Scene Shaping and Action Empowerment: Three Foundations for Social Work to Participate in the Community Construction of Community Environmental [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 5-14.
[2] LIN Fangfei, ZHANG Zihao. Transforming the “ Threateners ”: Social Work’s Engagement in Community-Based Co-Management of Nature Reserves [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 15-28.
[3] CHENG Pengli. Research on the Construction of Environmental Social Work Method System with Advocacy as the Core [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 29-35.
[4] FENG Boya. Research on Social Workers’ Environmental Consciousness from the Perspective of Green Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 36-46.
[5] LIU Changxi, CUI Zhanmin. A Study of Financialization, Longevity and Financial Capability Enhancement [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 47-56.
[6] YIN Yin, CUI Youyou. Financial Social Work as Assistance to Intelligent Old-Age Care: The Perspective of Active Ageing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 57-63.
[7] JI Wenxiao, LI Erpeng, Wang Ning. Research on Social Work Practice in Post-Disaster Transitional Resettlement Area: Taking the “7·20” Catastrophic Flood Disaster in Xinxiang as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 64-77.
[8] HUANG Qinglin, LI Ting. An Analysis of the Effect of the Basic Medical Insurance for Urban and Rural Residents on Alleviating Old Age Poverty in China: From the Perspective of Dual Poverty [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 78-86.
[9] MAI Yingte. Research on the Objectives and Policy Instruments of Social Work Policies for the Elderly: Based on the Analysis of 58 Central Policy Texts [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(5): 87-96.
[10] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[11] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[12] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[13] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[14] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[15] WEN Hao, Sile Hu. Academic Stress and Internalizing Problems among Chinese High Schoolers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators and Implications [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 48-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!