SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 109-112.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Impact of Enrollment System Reform in Key Universities on the Enrollment Opportunities of Rural Students

WANG Xiangli   

  1. Periodical Center, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510090, China
  • Received:2018-11-20 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-09-23

Abstract: In the process of popularization of higher education in China, students from urban and wealthy families are more likely to get high-quality higher education opportunities, while students from rural and poverty-stricken areas have relatively limited opportunities. The difference of higher education opportunities between urban and rural children is not only reflected in the quantity, but also in the quality. The gap between urban and rural economy and the development level of basic education are the main reasons for this difference, and to a certain extent, the current enrollment system in colleges and universities strengthens the difference. Among them, the enrollment system based on scores, recommendation and comprehensive evaluation is not conducive for the rural students to get into the key universities. Therefore, in the design of college enrollment system, we should pay more attention to the enrollment opportunities of rural students. Not only should we adopt a preferential policy towards rural students, but also take measures to improve the quality of rural basic education and the comprehensive ability of rural students.

Key words: key universities, reform of enrollment system, education equity, rural students

CLC Number: 

  • G646
[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2017年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2018-07-19). http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/201807/t20180719_343508.html.
[2] 中华人民共和国国务院. 国务院关于印发国家教育事业发展"十三五"规划的通知.[EB/OL].[2018-07-19]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-01/19/content_5161341.htm.
[3] 王伟宜. 高等教育入学机会获得的阶层差异分析——基于1982-2020年我国16所高校的实证调查[J]. 高等教育研究, 2013(12):35-44
[4] 罗立祝. 社会阶层对保送生高等教育入学机会的影响[J]. 高等教育研究, 2008(8):32-41
[5] 黄晓婷, 关可心, 熊光辉, 等. "超级中学"公平与效率的实证研究——以K大学学生学业成绩表现为例[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2016(5):32-37
[6] 李克强. 政府工作报告(2015)[EB/OL]. (2015-03-17). http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2015/0317/c1024-26702211.html.
[7] 图说:2017级北大新生数据大解密[EB/OL]. (2017-09-04). http://edu.sina.com.cn/gaokao/2017-09-04/doc-ifykqmrv8797563.shtml.
[8] LUCAS R S. Effectively maintained inequality:education transitions, track mobility, and social background effcets[J]. Amercian journal of sociology, 2001, 106(6):1642-1690
[9] 薛海平. 从学校教育到影子教育:教育竞争与社会再生产[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2015(3):47-69
[10] 李骏. 城乡出身与累积优势:对高学历劳动者的一项追踪研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2016(2):57-81
[11] 谢爱磊. "读书无用"还是"读书无望"——对底层居民教育观念的再认识[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2017(3):92-108
[12] 吴晓刚, 李忠路. 中国高等教育中的自主招生与人才选拔:来自北大、清华和人大的发现[J]. 社会, 2017(5):139-164
[1] WANG Yating, WANG Huiquan. An Investigation of Targeted Financial Assistance Work Path in University in the New Norm Era [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(4): 96-100.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!