理念、条件与机制：社会工作循证实践发展的研究议题

Abstract

Abstract: This paper focuses on the issues of ideal, condition and mechanism in future research on evidence-based social work. As regards to ideal, evidence-based social work needs to pay attention to how to respond to or absorb the standpoints such as social justice orientation, reflective practice, and non-hierarchization. In terms of condition, it is necessary to identify the institutional thought and organizational conditions of evidence-based social work. As regards to mechanism, the realization mechanism of the whole long chain of evidence-based practice needs to be clarified. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out normative research at the level of ideal, but also to carry out in-depth empirical research based on the theoretical support of sociology, communication and other disciplines, and reveal the dynamics and resistance of emergence, dissemination and implementation of new knowledge/technology. Particularly important is that Chinese social work has a unique path of development. To answer the above questions, scholars have to restart on the basis of the western experience.

Key words: evidence-based social work, ideal, condition, mechanism

CLC Number:

C916

CHEN Weijie. Ideal, Condition and Mechanism: Research Issues about theDevelopment of Evidence-based Social Work[J].SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(5): 29-37.

References 79

[1]	TERRY M, DAVIS L E. Encyclopedia of social work (20th edition)[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2008:158.
[2]	SOYDAN HALUK, PALINKAS LAWRENCE A. Evidence-based practice in social work:development of a new professional culture[M]. New York:Routledge, 2014.
[3]	BARKER ROBERT L. The dictionary of social work[M]. Washington, DC:The NASW Press, 2014.
[4]	GRINNELL R M, UNRAU Y A. Social work research and evaluation:foundations of evidence-based practice[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2011.
[5]	BREKKE J S. Shaping a science of social work[J]. Research on social work practice, 2012, 22(5):455-464
[6]	ROBERTS A R, YEAGER K R. Foundations of evidence-based social work practice[M].New York:Oxford University Press, 2006.
[7]	GRAY MEL, PLATH DEBBIE, WEBB STEPHEN A. Evidence-based social work:a critical stance[M]. London, New York:Routledge, 2009.
[8]	DRISKO JAMES W, GRADY MELISSA D. Evidence-based practice in clinical social work[M]. New York:Springer, 2012.
[9]	PALINKAS LAWRENCE A, SOYDAN HALUK. Translation and implementation of evidence based practice[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, Inc., 2012.
[10]	PETROSINO. Reflections on the genesis of the campbell collaboration[J]. The experimental criminologist, 2013, 8(2):9-12
[11]	拜争刚. 循证理念和方法在中国社会工作领域的应用现状分析[J]. 社会建设, 2017(4):57-66
[12]	何雪松. 证据为本的实践的兴起及其对中国社会工作发展的启示[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2004(1):13-18
[13]	杨文登. 社会工作的循证实践:西方社会工作发展的新方向[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(2):50-59
[14]	彭少峰, 张昱. 循证社会工作的本土模式、实践限度与可能价值——以南通循证矫正为例[J]. 学习与实践, 2015(2):99-106
[15]	范斌, 方琦. 社会工作证据为本的实践:演进脉络与发展趋向[J]. 学海, 2017(6):79-84
[16]	郭伟和, 徐明心, 陈涛. 社会工作实践模式:从"证据为本"到反思性对话实践——基于"青红社工"案例的行动研究[J]. 思想战线, 2012(3):34-39
[17]	尉宁. 循证实践在社会工作机构中的运用[D]. 南京:南京理工大学, 2013.
[18]	吴世友, 朱眉华, 苑玮烨. 资产为本的干预项目与社会工作实务研究设计——基于上海市G机构的一项扶贫项目的试验性研究[J]. 社会建设, 2016(3):48-57
[19]	朱晓, 曾育彪. 资产社会政策在中国实验的启示——以一项针对北京外来务工子女的资产建设项目为例[J]. 社会建设, 2016(6):18-26
[20]	范逸琦, 安秋玲. 机构老年痴呆症患者的音乐干预研究——以上海N福利院为例[J]. 社会建设, 2016(6):27-38
[21]	吴帆, 郭申阳, 马克·弗雷泽. 社会工作服务介入儿童行为发展效果评估的实证研究[J]. 社会建设, 2016(6):6-17
[22]	薛媛媛. 干预手册方案设计的基本过程与处置原则——以围产期孕产妇预防抑郁项目为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(5):6-14
[23]	吴同, 马俊豪. 音乐记忆训练对轻度阿尔兹海默症记忆障碍的干预研究——以上海市M福利院为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(5):33-43
[24]	王海萍, 许秀娴. 我国社会工作干预项目评估流程与方法回顾[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(5):15-20
[25]	梁瑞佳, 安秋玲. 机构老年人脑衰老焦虑状况的干预研究——以上海市D、M福利院健脑操项目为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(5):21-32
[26]	FU F, ZHAO H J, TONG F, et al. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to cancer caregivers[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2017(8):834
[27]	张婷婷, 张曙. 认知行为治疗在丧亲照顾中应用成效的系统评价[J]. 社会建设, 2017(4):30-41
[28]	刘米娜, 李学斌. 太极延缓社区中老年人认知功能衰退有效性的系统评价[J]. 社会建设, 2017(4):42-56
[29]	王英, 拜争刚, 吴同, 等. 社区层面开展的多专业联合干预老年自杀有效吗?[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(6):62-73, 113
[30]	TANG YONG, FU FANG, GAO HUA, et al. Art therapy for anxiety, depression, and fatigue in females with breast cancer:a systematic review[J]. Journal of psychosocial oncology, 2019, 37(1):79-95
[31]	顾晓明, 任建华, 邱炜. 规范与循证矫正——南通市崇川区社区矫正生命树的实践探索[M]. 上海:华东理工大学出版社, 2014:18.
[32]	郭伟和. 扩展循证矫正模式:循证矫正在中国的处境化理解和应用[J]. 社会工作, 2017(5):3-13, 110
[33]	王思斌. 中国社会的求-助关系——制度与文化的视角[J]. 社会学研究, 2001(4):1-10
[34]	张昱, 孙志丽. 社会工作的社会建构[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(2):31-38
[35]	王思斌. 中国社会工作的嵌入性发展[J]. 社会科学战线, 2011(2):206-222
[36]	文军. 论社会工作理论研究范式及其发展趋势[J]. 江海学刊, 2012(4):125-131
[37]	林顺利. 中国社会工作教育的兴起与发展[J]. 社会工作, 2016(2):11-17, 122
[38]	关信平. 论当前我国专业社会工作的制度建设[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2017(5):21-27,144
[39]	郭伟和. 迈向反身性实践的社会工作实务理论——当前社会工作理论界的若干争论及其超越[J]. 学海, 2018(1):125-133
[40]	SPECHT HARRY, COURTNEY MARK E. Unfaithful angels:how social work has abandoned its mission[M]. New York:Simon & Schuster, 1995.
[41]	DAVIES HUW T O, NUTLEY SANDRA M, SMITH PETER C. What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services[M] Bristol:The Policy Press, 2000.
[42]	FRIEDLAENDER ERON, WINSTON FLAURA. Evidence based advocacy[J]. Injury prevention, 2004, 10(6):324-326
[43]	MCNUTT JOHN G. Building evidence-based advocacy in cyberspace:a social work imperative for the new millennium[J]. Journal of evidence-based social work, 2006, 3(3/4):91-102
[44]	HICK S, MCNUTT J. Advocacy and activism on the internet:perspectives from community organization and social policy[M]. Chicago, IL:Lyceum Press, 2002.
[45]	WEBB S A. Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work[J]. British journal of social work, 2001, 31(1):57-79
[46]	HUMPHRIES BETH. What else counts as evidence in evidence-based social work?[J]. Social work education, 2003, 22(1):81-91
[47]	古学斌. 行动研究与社会工作的介入[J]. 中国社会工作研究, 2013:1-30
[48]	SCHÖN DONALD A. The reflective practitioner:how professionals think in action[M]. New York:Basic Books, Inc., 1983.
[49]	BARREDO R D V. Reflection and evidence-based practice in action:a case based application[J]. Internet journal of allied health science & practice, 2005, 3
[50]	弗雷泽, 等. 干预研究:如何开发社会项目[M]. 安秋玲, 译. 上海:上海教育出版社, 2018.
[51]	夏林清. 斗室星空:"家"的社会田野[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 30(3):88-103
[52]	龚尤倩, 夏林清. 行动研究的社会探究之道——以台湾社工专业实践为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(3):57-66
[53]	PETR CHRISTOPHER G, WALTER UTA M. Evidence-based practice:a critical reflection[J]. European journal of social work, 2009, 2(2):221-232
[54]	TONG A, FLEMMING K, MCINNES E, et al. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research:ENTREQ[J]. BMC med res methodol, 2012, 12(1):181
[55]	THYER BRUCE A. Evidence-based practice and social work[A]//MEL GRAY, JAMES MIDGLEY, STEPHEN A WEBB. The SAGE Handbook of Social Work. Landon:SAGE Publications Ltd, 2012:408.
[56]	MADISON ANNA-MARIE. Performance and accountability in human services:ownership and responsibility of professionals[J]. New England journal of public policy, 1997(13):165-173
[57]	GINSBERG LEON H. 社会工作评估:原理与方法[M]. 黄晨曦, 译. 上海:华东理工大学出版社, 2013:7-9.
[58]	杨文登, 叶浩生. 社会科学的三次"科学化"浪潮:从实证研究、社会技术到循证实践[J]. 社会科学, 2012(8):107-116
[59]	拜争刚, 齐铱, 杨克虎, 等. 循证社会科学的起源、现状及展望[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018(10):1118-1121
[60]	GAMBRILL E E. Evidence-based practice:an alternative to authority-based practice[J]. Families in society:the journal of contemporary social services, 1999, 80(4):341-350
[61]	ZHANG A, FRANKLIN, JI Q, et al. Evidence-based practice in Chinese social work:overcoming language and developmental barriers[J]. China journal of social work, 2018, 11(1):41-55
[62]	REID W J. The empirical practice movement[J]. Social service review, 1994, 68(2):165-184
[63]	GELLIS Z, REID W. Strengthening evidence-based practice[J]. Brief treatment and crisis intervention, 2004(4):155-165
[64]	ROSEN A. The scientific practitioner revisited:some obstacles and prerequisites for fuller implementation in practice[J]. Social work research, 1996, 20(2):105-111
[65]	周雪光.中国国家治理的制度逻辑[M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2017.
[66]	TASK FORCE ON SOCIAL WORD RESEARCH. Building social work knowledge for effective services and policies:a plan for research development[M]. Austin:University of Texas School of Social Work, 1991:66.
[67]	SOYDAN HALUK. Understanding social work in the history of ideas[J]. Research on social work practice, 2012, 22(5):468-480
[68]	ZLOTNIK JOAN LEVY, BIEGEL DAVID E, SOLT BARBARA E. The institute for the advancement of social work research:strengthening social work research in practice and policy[J]. Research on social work practice, 2002, 12(2):318-337
[69]	PADGETT D K. The society for social work and research at 10 years of age and counting:an idea whose time had come[J]. Research on social work practice, 2005, 15(1):3-7
[70]	WILLIAMS JANET B W, TRIPODI TONY, RUBIN ALLEN, et al. A historical account of the society for social work and research:presidential perspectives on advances in research infrastructure[J]. Social work research, 2008, 32(4):208-219
[71]	拜争刚, 赵坤, 刘丹, 等. 循证社会科学的推动者:Campbell协作网[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018(12):1380-1385
[72]	OSTERLING KATHY LEMON, AUSTIN MICHAEL J. The dissemination and utilization of research for promoting evidence-based practice[J]. Journal of evidence-based social work, 2008, 5(1/2):295-319
[73]	刘思达. 职业自主性与国家干预——西方职业社会学研究述评[J]. 社会学研究, 2006(1):197-221
[74]	WIKE TRACI L, BLEDSOE SARAH E, et al. Evidence-based practice in social work:challenges and opportunities for clinicians and organizations[J]. Clinic social work journal, 2014(42):161-170
[75]	ZERHOUNI E. The NIH roadmap[J]. Science. 2003, 302(5642):63-72.
[76]	WANDERSMAN A, DUFFY J, FLASPOHLER, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice:the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation[J]. American journal of community psychology, 2008, 41(3-4):171-181
[77]	PINCH J T, BIJKER E W. The social construction of facts and artefacts:or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other[J]. Social studies of science, 1984(14):399-441
[78]	CALLON M. The sociology of an actor-network:the case of the electric vehicle[A]//CALLON M, LAW J, RIP A. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London:Macmillan Press, 1986:19-34.
[79]	罗杰斯. 创新的扩散[M]. 辛欣, 译. 北京:中央编译出版社, 2002:21.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Ideal, Condition and Mechanism: Research Issues about theDevelopment of Evidence-based Social Work

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 79

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHU Hao, XU Shuhong. The Dilemma and Mechanism Innovation of Social Organizations Participating in the Supply of Children’s Welfare Services: A Case Study of Shanghai [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 70-78.
[2]	LIU Jiang, GU Donghui. Method-Based, Theory-Driven and Mechanism Analysis: Three Approaches for Social Work Service Effect Evaluation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(6): 5-13.
[3]	ZHONG Xingju, WANG Liyuan. Exploring a Community-Oriented Aged Care Model from the Developmental Perspective: A Case Study on the Construction of Pension Canteen of X Community in Chongqing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(5): 70-82.
[4]	FU Shuangle, YANG Bowen, LIU Linping. Rationality or Legitimacy: Motive Mechanism of Social Work Major Development: Study on Major Arrangement of Higher Learning Institutions in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 51-62.
[5]	TANG Yaoping, HUANG Yali. Research on Establishing Supervision Mechanism of Pension Service Industry in Guangzhou [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(1): 81-88.
[6]	LIU Jie, XIE Guimei, ZOU Ying. Reasons for the Alienation of Medical Social Work Department: A Case Study Based on H Hospital in F Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(5): 30-41.
[7]	TONG Feng, YANG Yi, YU Chenglin. The Study of Evidence-based Social Work Intervention in Long-term Care Model for the Elderly [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(5): 62-68.
[8]	TAN Lei. Study on the Evaluation Mechanism for Social Work Participating in the Service of the Public Welfare Institutions [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(2): 58-64.
[9]	HUANG Jianfeng, YAN Zi. Underpinning Social Security Mechanism from the Perspective of Synergetic Governance: On the Coupling Mechanism of Structural Synergy and Procedural Synergy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(2): 81-91.
[10]	LUO kewen, HUANG xinxin. On the Reform and Reflection to the Classifying Evaluation Mechanism for University Faculty against the Background of Constructing High-level University [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(6): 114-118.
[11]	SHAO Junwu. Perfecting the Internal Relief Mechanism of Students' Rights and Interests in Colleges and Universities by Introducing Jury Form [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19(2): 85-91.
[12]	FANG Ying, ZHU Junrong. Institutional Isomorphism and Heteromorphism of Social Work Organization under the Project Mechanism: Taking Social Work Agencies in Guangdong Province as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(6): 59-65.
[13]	WAN Guowei, LIU Chen, CHEN Mengzhen. Theoretical Trends of East Asian Welfare Regime: Overseas Studies in Recent 30 Years [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(4): 66-74.
[14]	XU Zehao. Practical Education Mechanism Exploration for University Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the context of new teaching resources: From the Perspective of SNM [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(4): 82-86.
[15]	Yang Weiwei. Back to Social Work Classic Study: Exploring the Theoretical Connotation and Methodology Development of “Person in Environment” [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(2): 19-29.