SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 64-71.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Dilemma of Implementing Mandatory Reporting System for Child Abuse in China

LIN Dian   

  1. Law School, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, 201620, China
  • Received:2019-06-26 Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-25

Abstract: It is reasonable to develop the mandatory reporting system for child abuse in the face of China’s growing problem of child abuse, but it needs to be carefully evaluated and studied before it is carried out. If the system is implemented without careful consideration and solving its dilemma, it will not only fail to achieve the effectiveness of the system, but may also create negative effects. At present, eight difficulties should be dealt with if the mandatory reporting system for child abuse is to be implemented in China: the cultural level, the legal level, the procedural guidelines, the responsible departments, the supporting facilities, the civil organizations, the responsible staff and the system researches. Solutions to these problems should be systematically considered for the effective application of the mandatory reporting system for child abuse. First of all, the children’s rights and interests should be actively advocated and safeguarded at the cultural level. Secondly, we should improve the legislative system of the mandatory reporting system for child abuse. Thirdly, government should establish a competent authority in charge of the prevention and treatment of child abuse, and supporting facilities should be improved. Fourthly, we should speed up the development of NGO and build a mode of cooperation between NGO and the government. Finally, government should establish the main status of social workers and strengthen the research on the mandatory reporting system for child abuse.

Key words: child abuse, mandatory reporting system, mandatory reporting

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 余汉仪. 变调的儿童保护[J]. 台大社会工作学刊, 1999(1): 151-179
[2] 陈逸青.国小教育人员对儿童虐待责任通报制态度与经验之研究——以台中市为例[D].台中: 静宜大学, 2010: 10.
[3] 高丽茹. 美国儿童保护制度的发展对中国的启示[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2016(6): 80-84
[4] 彭淑华.台湾儿童及少年福利政策与法令制度之发展[J/OL].[2018-04-15].http://www.cares.org.tw/files/4200/80/3-5--%E5%BD%AD%E6%B7%91%E8%8F%AF--new.pdf.
[5] 强制通报可行吗?专家: 要有足够资源配套[N]. [2018-2-10]. http://www.aca.org.hk/media-report/20180210_hkcnews.pdf.
[6] 徐慧, 胡蝶飞.儿童家暴面临发现难、起诉难、救助难[N].上海法治报, 2013-05-29(A02).
[7] 裴斐. 完善儿童虐待防治法律问题研究[J]. 当代青年研究, 2013(6): 81-86
[8] 刘向宁. 当务之急和制度构建: 从南京虐童案看儿童虐待强制报告[J]. 中国青年研究, 2015(9): 42-46
[9] 刘建榕, 刘金花. 《颜氏家训·教子》的家庭教育心理学思想探析[J]. 心理科学, 1998(4): 369-370
[10] 朱婷婷. 从儿童躯体虐待角度: 看中国传统教养方式对儿童心理发展的影响[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2005(4): 58-61
[11] 孟庆跃, 王健, 黄思桂, 刘兴柱. 虐儿方式及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国社会医学, 1994(1): 32-34
[12] 孟庆跃, 刘兴柱, 王健, 等. 父母忽视、训斥和体罚儿童的频度研究[J]. 中国社会医学, 1994(2): 44-46
[13] 王粉燕, 陈晶琦, 马玉霞. 包头市810名幼儿父母躯体暴力行为调查[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2007(11): 987-988
[14] 刘翠霞, 罗西贝, 蒋秋静, 等. 武汉市城区3~6岁儿童忽视状况的调查分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2009(27): 3831-3833
[15] 胡星. “自己的孩子可以打, 没有人能管我”[N]. 新华每日电讯, 2013-05-15.
[16] 刘建国. 南京“虐童案”戳中儿童维权软肋[N]. 检察日报, 2015-07-22(006).
[17] 胡杰容. 儿童保护的现实困境与制度创新——以“南京虐童案”为例[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(3): 51-58
[18] 儿童权利公约[EB/OL]. [2018-04-15].http://www.un.org/chinese/hr/issue/docs/24.PDF.
[19] 冯晓霞. 家长的教育观念与儿童权利保护——中国家庭中的儿童权利保护问题[J]. 学前教育研究, 1996(3): 20-22
[20] 乔东平, 谢倩雯. 中西方中西方“儿童虐待”认识差异的逻辑根源[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2015(1): 25-32
[21] 宁应斌. 从虐待、恶待到误待儿童: “Child Abuse”的翻译与儿童性侵害的政治[J]. 性别研究, 1999(5): 273-280
[22] 钱铭怡, 刘桂臻, 肖广兰. 北京、宁夏两地青少年父母教养方式的比较研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1999(1): 40-42
[23] 王娟, 张积家, 邓碧琳, 等. 摩梭人的父母教养方式——兼与汉族人的父母教养方式比较[J]. 教育导刊, 2012(7): 38-41
[24] 吴鹏飞. 我国儿童虐待防治法律制度的完善[J]. 法学杂志, 2012(10): 56-60
[25] 中华人民共和国未成年人保护法[N]. 人民日报, 2007-01-10(008).
[26] 中华人民共和国反家庭暴力法[N]. 人民日报, 2016-01-26(010).
[27] 乔东平, 廉婷婷, 苏林伟. 中国儿童福利政策新发展与新时代政策思考——基于2010年以来的政策文献研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019(3): 78-88
[28] 香港社会福利署.处理虐待儿童个案程序指引(2015年修订版)[EB/OL]. [2018-04-15].http://www.swd.gov.hk/doc/fcw/proc_guidelines/childabuse/Procedural%20Guide%20for%20Handling%20Child%20Abuse%20Cases(Revised%202015)_updated%20May%202017_TC.pdf.
[29] 儿童及少年保护工作指南[EB/OL]. [2018-04-15]. https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOPS/cp-1240-6870-105.html.
[30] 教育人员及少年保护工作手册[EB/OL]. [2018-04-15]. http://203.68.64.40/six/main/board/view.asp?ID=1655.
[31] 民政部.受监护侵害未成年人保护工作指引[EB/OL].(2017-04-20). http://shaanxi.mca.gov.cn/article/zxxz/201704/20170401011883.shtml.
[32] 国务院.国务院关于加强困境儿童保障工作的意见[EB/OL].(2016-6-16). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-06/16/content_5082800.htm.
[33] 民政部.家庭寄养管理办法[EB/OL].(2014-09-24).http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2014/content_2792649.htm.
[34] 全国人大常委会.中华人民共和国收养法(修正)[EB/OL]. (2016-07-01).http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/lfzt/rlyw/2016-07/01/content_1992751.htm.
[35] 林典. 社会工作介入我国儿童虐待服务的策略研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(1): 17-23
[36] 申小静, 陈钰. 论反家暴法中的强制报告制度——以儿童保护为视角[J]. 法制博览, 2017(25): 233
[37] 林典, 韩思齐. 社会工作从业人员对儿童虐待责任通报态度之研究——以上海地区为例[J]. 重庆城市管理职业学院学报, 2018(4): 4-9
[38] 姚学宁. 网络儿童色情强制报告制度——基于中加两国儿童保护强制报告制度的比较性分析[J]. 中国应用法学, 2019(2): 112-126
[39] 隗苗苗. 我国香港地区政府购买社会公共服务的现状及其启示[J]. 长沙民政职业技术学院学报, 2016(4): 2-7
[40] 谭磊. 英美国家社工参与弱势儿童福利照顾体系及启示——基于技术治理的视角[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(4): 75-81
[1] FENG Yuan. The Social Characteristics and Prevention Strategies of Child Sexual Assault [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(3): 72-77.
[2] HU Jierong. The Practical Tensions and Institutional Innovation of the Child Protection: A Case Study of Child Abuse in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(3): 51-58.
[3] LIN Dian. The Research on Social Work Intervention Strategy for Child Abuse in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(1): 17-23.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!