SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 72-78.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Difficulties and Development of Educational Assessment for Children with Intellectual Disabilities in China: Based on the Experience of America Special Education Assessment System

DU Nan   

  1. Department of Social Work,East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China
  • Received:2018-09-30 Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-25

Abstract: Based on the description ofapplication of the intellectual disability assessment system in special education in China and America, this paper summarizes the difficulties in practice of this field, including the lack of legislative protection, ambiguous classification of children with special needs and the lack of a unified assessment process and appropriate local assessment tools. These limitation may affect the result whether the tested children can take part in special education and which services and corrections are assigned to them. These conditions are not conducive to the benign development of the tested children and the rational allocation of educational resources. Based on the experience of special education evaluation in America, this paper finally puts forward some suggestions to promote the development of intellectual disability education evaluation in China, such as legislative support, establishment of authoritative evaluation institutions or departments, scientific evaluation criteria, improve local measurement tools, increase school social work participation and professional construction of social work.

Key words: special education, children with intellectual disabilities, assessment, social work

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 刘春玲. 智力障碍儿童的发展与教育[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011: 5.
[2] 中华人民共和国教育部. 特殊教育基本情况(总计)[EB/OL]. [2018-10-11]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A03/moe_560/jytjsj_2014/2014_gd/201508/t20150831_204453.html.
[3] 韦小满. 美国特殊教育立法中有关评估的法律和法规概述[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2005(10): 73-76
[4] 杨娟. 我国特殊儿童教育评估中存在的问题[J]. 成都师范学院学报, 2011(10): 109-112
[5] 王辉. 智力障碍儿童教育评估问题的几点思考[J]. 现代特殊教育, 2010(11): 14-17
[6] 刘明, 邓赐平. 美英特殊儿童评估现状及启示[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2009(9): 14-18
[7] 高杭. 美国《残疾人教育法案》: 法理、实践及其公平意义[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2010(7): 23-25
[8] 艾伦·米瑞斯. 学校社会工作[M]. 陈蓓丽, 蔡屹, 曹锐, 等, 译. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2008.
[9] 林文亿. 美国学校社会工作发展及其对我国的启示[J]. 青年探索, 2009(1): 86-90
[10] 陈奇娟. 美国学校社会工作在特殊教育实践中的介入[J]. 社会福利(理论版), 2015(9): 41-45
[11] 安秋玲. 论社会工作在我国特殊儿童教育中的介入[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2009(3): 13-16
[12] 江秀娜. 社会排斥视角下社会工作介入特殊儿童教育——对X机构六名特殊儿童个案的分析[J]. 社会福利(理论版), 2012(9): 40-45
[13] 何侃, 王娟, 张媛, 等. 智障群体的教育公平现状及思考[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2008(1): 56-62
[14] 严淑琼, 方俊明. 曼彻斯特全纳标准对我国全纳教育的启示[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2008(8): 21-26
[15] 中国残疾人联合会.1987年全国残疾人抽样调查五类《残疾标准》[EB/OL]. [2018-10-11]. http://www.cdpf.org.cn/sjzx/cjrgk/200804/t20080402_387545_2.shtml.
[16] 全日制弱智学校(班)教学计划(征求意见稿)[J].人民教育,1988(6):8-9.
[17] 陈久奎, 阮李全. 特殊教育立法问题研究——人文关怀的视角[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2006(6): 49-54
[18] SPTUILL J. Composite SAS of the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale, fourth edition: is it determined by only one are SAS[J]. Psychological assessment, 1996, 8(3): 328-330
[19] 仇剑崟, 赵介城, 崔萍. C-WISC和BT-CR对智力偏低儿童的评估[J]. 上海精神医学, 1994(3): 152-154
[20] 宁亚飞, 缪玉, 刘淑飞, 等. 智力障碍儿童智力等级评定工具问题[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2013(12): 1292-1294
[21] 陈家麟. 学校心理健康教育——原理与操作[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2002: 235-255.
[22] 郑日昌, 陈永胜. 儿童心理辅导[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2003: 126-130.
[23] 胡晓毅. 美国特殊教育立法中非歧视性评估原则及其对我国的启示[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2005(02): 14-18
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[11] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[12] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[13] YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[14] HE Xuesong, WANG Tianqi. 2021 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
[15] HE Jian, LAN Caiguang. Help Others by Mutual Assistance VS. Help Others to Self-Reliance: A New Interpretation of the Localization of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 16-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!