SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 86-92.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Exploring the Forming Process of “Community, Social Organizations and Social Workers” Joint Action Mechanism in Urban Community: Based on the Experience of a Pilot Plan in S City

GU Jiang-xia   

  1. School of Humanities and Communication, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics,Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510320, China
  • Received:2018-08-25 Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-25

Abstract: It is difficult for the government alone to deal with the various governance problems in the grass-roots communities because of the tremendous change incurrent urban community structure. The “community, social organizations and social workers” joint action led by the State is a beneficial attempt to build a pluralistic community governance network. This paper analyzes the opportunity and cooperation form for the community resident’s committee, social organizations and social work agency to work together. Under the guidance of the grass-roots government, especially the sub-district office, the three agencies can jointly cope with public crisis in the community through consultation, communication and cooperation. They can hold activities such as venture philanthropy to stimulate residents to participate in, and integrate various resources to solve the common needs of the community, thus gradually forming“community, social organizations and social workers” joint actions mechanism. However, as the result of the lack of relevant policy in this process, the government should guide and standardize the development of community social organizations and develop community residents’ participation in order to improve the modernization level of community governance.

Key words: “community, social organizations and social workers” joint actions, grass-root level governance, residents participation

CLC Number: 

  • C912
[1] 民政部, 财政部. 关于加快推进社区社会工作服务的意见[EB/OL]. [2014-02-20]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2014/content_2600242.htm.
[2] 郭伟和. 地方性实践知识: 城市社区工作者反建制力量的隐蔽领域——基于B市莲花社区的个案研究[J]. 学海, 2016(2): 143-152
[3] 朱健刚,陈安娜. 嵌入中的专业社会工作与街区权力关系——对一个政府购买服务项目的个案分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2013(1): 43-64
[4] 李祥, 陈淑秋. 特大城市基层社会治理现代化的“三社联动”机制[J]. 佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版), 2018(5): 25-31
[5] 顾东辉. “三社联动”的内涵解构与逻辑演绎[J]. 学海, 2016(5): 104-110
[6] 肖唐镖, 谢菁. “三社联动”机制: 理论基础与实践绩效[J]. 地方治理研究, 2017(1): 40-51
[7] 王学梦, 李敏. 接纳、嵌入与融合: “三社联动”的内在机理与关系建构[J]. 治理研究, 2018(6): 93-102
[8] 曹海军, 吴兆飞. 社区治理和服务视野下的三社联动: 生成逻辑、运行机制与路径优化[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(6): 30-37
[9] CUTHIL MICHAEL, JO HN. Capacity building: Facilitating citizen participation in local governance[J]. Australian journal of public administration, 2005, 64(4): 63-80
[10] ZHOU MUJUN. Debating the state in private housing neighborhoods: The governance of homeowners'associations in urban Shanghai[J]. International journal of urban and regional research, 2014(9): 1846-66
[11] 陈鹏. 从“产权”走向“公民权”[J]. 开放时代, 2009(4): 126-139
[12] 黄晓星. 社区运动的“社区性”——对现行社区运动理论的回应与补充[J]. 社会学研究, 2011(1): 41-62
[13] 朱健刚. 社区组织化参与中的公民性养成——以上海一个社区为个案[J]. 思想战线, 2012(2): 55-60
[14] 陈映芳. 城市中国的逻辑[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 2012: 310-385.
[15] 石发勇. 准公民社区——国家、关系网络与城市基层治理[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2013: 21-22.
[16] 莱斯特·M·萨拉蒙. 政府工具: 新治理指南[M]. 肖娜, 等, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 7-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!