SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 93-101.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on Urban Community Construction from the Perspective of Project System: A Case Study of the Guangzhou Happy Community Construction Project

KUANG Mengye   

  1. College of Social and Public Administration, Guangdong Baiyun University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510450, China
  • Received:2018-08-30 Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-25

Abstract: This paper explores the action logic and strategy of the main participants in Guangzhou Happy Community Construction project from the perspective of project system and with reference to research methods of practical sociology. As the project owner, the Bureau of Civil Affairs of Guangzhou Municipality acts as project planner, resource distributor,organizer and coordinator, and its actions follow the logic of benefit and efficiency. District civil affairs bureaus and sub-district offices, as the project packers, play a role to reallocate resource and transfer information, which follows the logic of task completion and project developing. Due to their different cognition of the whole project and personal working attitude, the community committees adopt action strategiesfor community construction in the competition for the packaged projects. Their action strategies can be roughly divided into 3 types: proactive, perfunctoryand complaining.This project-based community construction, to a certain extent, achieves the aim of locating community demand as the work focus and improves the efficiency and effect of community construction. However, this operation mode is restricted and influenced by the bureaucracy and project system in the reality. The divergence of the interests of the participants leads to the alienation of the project objectives, and also brings a cumulative gap of wealth to the grassroots community.

Key words: urban communities, community construction, project system

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 阿兰纳·伯兰德, 朱健刚. 公众参与与社区公共空间的生产——对绿色社区建设的个案研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2007(4): 118-136
[2] 新快报. 两年多投入7亿元, “幸福社区”建成啥模样[EB/OL]. [2014-04-06]. https://m.fang.com/news/gz/789_15483936.html?src=client&from=timeline&isappinstalled=0.
[3] 吴晓林, 郝丽娜. “社区复兴运动”以来国外社区治理研究的理论考察[J]. 政治学研究, 2015(1): 47-58
[4] WEIL M O. Community building: Building community practice[J]. Social work, 1996, 41(5): 481-499
[5] GARDNER J W. Building community for leadership studies program[M]. Washington, DC: Independent Sector, 1994: 15-27.
[6] 香港社区工作教育工作者联席会议. 社区工作理论与实践[M]. 香港: 香港中文大学出版社, 1994: 121-123.
[7] 王思斌. 体制改革中的城市社区建设的理论分析[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2000(5): 5-14
[8] 唐忠新. 中国城市社区建设的兴起和主要特征[J]. 天津社会科学, 2001(6): 44-48
[9] 向德平, 申可君. 社区自治与基层社会治理模式的重构[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2013(2): 127-130
[10] 李波, 苗薇薇. 发达国家社区建设模式及其对我国的启示[J]. 山东社会科学, 2009(11): 142-143
[11] 陈文茹. 西方发达国家城市社区建设的现状及发展趋势分析[J]. 前沿, 2007(2): 167-169
[12] 管志利. 社区管理模式之比较选择[J]. 山西青年管理干部学院院报, 2008(8): 87-90
[13] 罗光华. 城市基层社会管理模式创新研究——以广州市新一轮基层社会管理创新为例[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2011: 58-59.
[14] 陈治桃, 宋文祥, 黄丽华. 五型社区:城市社区社会治理新模式[M]. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2013: 006.
[15] 吴铎. 论社区建设主体——上海市浦东新区社区发展报告[J]. 社会学研究, 1997(5): 10-15
[16] 杨林. 城市社区建设中居民参与现状与对策研究[J]. 中国培训, 2016(24): 292
[17] 张圣. 共同体思想与社区公共精神的构建——中国社区建设的理论反思[J]. 福建行政学院学报, 2017(6): 112-120
[18] 折晓叶, 陈婴婴. 项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑——对“项目进村”案例的社会学分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(4): 126-148
[19] 渠敬东. 项目制: 一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(5): 113-130
[20] 郑晓茹. 城市社区项目制治理的行动框架、逻辑与范畴研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(5): 57-66
[21] 广东省人民政府. 印发广东省国民经济和社会发展第十二个五年规划纲要的通知[EB/OL]. [2018-08-10]. http://guoqing.china.com.cn/gbbg/2011-11/03/content_23815910.htm.
[22] 陈向军, 史勇, 邱艾邦, 等. 中共广东省第十一次代表大会今日召开[EB/OL]. [2018-08-10]. http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/70731/17844621.html.
[23] 广州市幸福社区创建工作指导平台. 走进幸福社区[EB/OL]. [2018-08-10]. http://www.gzmz.gov.cn/gzsmzj/zjxfsq/xfsq_list_tt3.shtml.
[1] ZHAO Dingdong, HUANG Zhaoyi. Time Banking in Community Building: Advantages, Dilemmas and Strategies Improvement: A case Study of LanJiang Street in Lanxi City [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 20(2): 71-80,91.
[2] 蓝Yu-Yun .
On the Construction of Autonomous “Safe Community”
[J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 14(3): 70-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!