SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 81-91.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Underpinning Social Security Mechanism from the Perspective of Synergetic Governance: On the Coupling Mechanism of Structural Synergy and Procedural Synergy

HUANG Jianfeng, YAN Zi   

  1. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200030, China
  • Received:2019-06-06 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-04-10

Abstract: Due to institutional rigidity, fragmented relief resources, and institutional segmentation, China's social relief system has lingering weaknesses and the security net for people's livelihood is incomplete for the underclass.Through analyzing prominent cases of the cooperative mechanism of underpinning social relief, practically, this paper discusses how the multiple relief subjects integrate resources for structural and procedural cooperation in the underpinning social relief on the practice level; on the theoretical level, this paper discusses the key factors of the successful coupling of structural and procedural synergies.It is found that goal consistency, governmental authority intervention and information sharing mechanism are seen as the driving force, key and core for successful collaborative coupling.The collaborative innovation in underpinning social assistance in the cases has important referential significance for the local governments on how to cooperate with social forces and build the resource pooling mechanism.

Key words: underpinning social security mechanism, synergetic governance, structural synergy, procedural synergy, coupling

CLC Number: 

  • D632.1
[1] 周沛. 协同治理视角下社会救助模式与机制创新[J]. 江淮论坛, 2017(1): 121-126
[2] 李薇, 丁建定. 主体整合:构建中国多元化社会救助制度[J]. 社会保障研究, 2013(2): 97-103
[3] 肖莎. 社会组织在社会救助事业中的参与:合作与互动[J]. 经济体制改革, 2010(6): 164-168
[4] 孙远太. 社会救助运行机制的功能障碍与改进路径[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(10): 40-44
[5] 兰剑, 慈勤英. 现代风险社会与“急难”风险的应对——兼论社会救助救急难的常态化机制构建[J]. 青海社会科学, 2015(4): 58-64
[6] M BARZELAY. The new public management: improving research and policy dialogue[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001:187.
[7] Joe F Donaldson,Charles E Kozoll. Collaborative program planning: principles, practices,and strategies[M]. Melbourne: Krieger Publishing Co., 1999: 1-2.
[8] 田培杰. 协同治理概念考辨[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(1): 124-140
[9] Chris Ansell and Alison Gash. Collaborative governance in theory and practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008(18): 543-571
[10] CP Tang, SY Tang. managing incentive dynamics for collaborative governance in land and ecological conservation[J]. Public Administration Review, 2014, 74(2): 220-231
[11] ARPJ Dewulf, M Mancero, G Cardenas, D Sucozhanay. Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: a case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador[J]. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2011, 77(1): 50-75
[12] 樊博, 于洁. 公共突发事件治理的信息协同机制研究[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2015(5): 16-30
[13] Lisa Blomgren Bingham. The next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance[J]. Wisconsin Law Review, 2010(10): 298-350
[14] Perri. Joined-Up government in the western world in comparative perspective: a preliminary literature review and exploration[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2004, 14(1): 103-138
[15] 林建. 新时期中国社会救助制度改革的路径选择[J]. 行政管理改革, 2017(2): 42-47
[16] 韩克庆. 市民社会与中国社会福利体制的构建[J]. 天津社会科学, 2008(1): 66-68
[17] 孙远太. 政府救助与慈善救助衔接机制构建研究——基于整体性治理视角[J]. 中国行政管理, 2015(8): 52-56
[18] 徐晞. 社区精准救助中的社会组织参与——基于美国经验与启示[J]. 东南学术, 2016(5): 65-74
[19] OECD. Public management service/public management committee (2000)[G]//Government Coherence: The Role of the Centre of Government: Budapest, 2000: 6-7.
[20] 周志忍, 蒋敏娟. 中国政府跨部门协同机制探析——一个叙事与诊断框架[J]. 公共行政评论, 2013(1): 91-117
[21] 周志忍, 蒋敏娟. 整体政府下的政策协同:理论与发达国家的当代实践[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2010(6): 28-33
[22] 徐艳晴, 周志忍. 水环境治理中的跨部门协同机制探析——分析框架与未来研究方向[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2014(6): 110-115
[23] 张振波. 论协同治理的生成逻辑与建构路径[J]. 中国行政管理, 2015(1): 58-61
[24] Siv Vangen, John Paul Hayes, Chris Cornforth. Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations[J]. Public Management Review, 2015, 17(9): 1237-1260
[25] 金太军, 鹿斌. 协同治理生成逻辑的反思与调整[J]. 行政论坛, 2016(5): 1-7
[26] 陈慧荣, 张煜. 基层社会协同治理的技术与制度:以上海市A区城市综合治理“大联动”为例[J]. 公共行政评论, 2015(1): 100-116
[27] 郑巧, 肖文涛. 协同治理:服务型政府的治道逻辑[J]. 中国行政管理, 2008(7): 48-53
[28] A T Himmelman. Collaboration for a change: Definitions, decision-making models, roles,and collaboration process guide[M]. Minneapolis: Himmelman Consulting, 2002: 3
[29] 郑功成. 中国社会救助制度的合理定位与改革取向[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2015(4): 17-22
[30] 周怡, 胡安宁. 有信仰的资本——温州民营企业主慈善捐赠行为研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2014(1): 57-81
[31] 马雪松. 结构、资源、主体:基本公共服务协同治理[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(7): 52-56
[32] 吴春梅, 庄永琪. 协同治理:关键变量、影响因素及实现途径[J]. 理论探索, 2013(3): 73-77
[33] 黄晓春.技术治理的运行机制研究:关于中国城市治理信息化的制度分析[M].上海:上海大学出版社,2018:12.
[34] 黄晓春. 理解中国的信息革命——驱动社会转型的结构性力量[J]. 科学学研究, 2010(2): 183-188
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!