SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 92-100.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Impact of Family Guardianship on the Pattern of Child Living Allowances: A Comparative Policy Analysis

WANG Huaqi, WU Qian, ZHAO Jing   

  1. School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangshu, 210009, China
  • Received:2019-10-22 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-04-10

Abstract: In recent years, China has rapidly shifted its anti-poverty policies for children from traditionally subsiding family income to enhancing children's ability. Based on the household survey of vulnerable children from seven sub-districts in the civil affairs department of District J, City A, this paper compares the basic allowance for children in the new project with the existing subsistence allowance projects in the light of family monitoring using disordered multi-classification logistic regression analysis. It is found that neither the composition of family guardians nor the degree of malpractice of guardianship had significant influence on the two types of policies. Nevertheless, both the types of guardianship distress and the levels of guardianship deficiency had strong impact on the subsistence allowance and had barely any effect on the basic allowance for children.Economic poverty and children’s distress have opposite effects on both types of policies.The lower the level of poverty, the more likely children are to receive child allowance. The lower the severity of disability, the more likely the child is to receive welfare.It is suggested that we should continue to optimize policies of subsistence allowance and child insurance for effective alleviation of children’s material poverty , and encourage more cooperation of policy enforcement departments and scientific research departments. In this way we can better identify the types or degrees of family guardianship difficulties and make it easier for implementing anti-poverty policies for children.

Key words: child poverty reduction, policy on child living allowances, family guardianship deficiencies

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 方黎明, 张秀兰. 中国农村扶贫的政策效应分析——基于能力贫困理论的考察[J]. 财经研究, 2007(12): 47-57
[2] 刘云香, 朱亚鹏. 向儿童投资: 福利国家社会政策的新转向[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(6): 127-134
[3] SEN A. Poor, relatively speaking[J]. Oxford economic papers, 1983, 35(2): 153-169
[4] SEN A. A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty: A reply to professor Peter Townsend[J]. Oxford economic papers, 1985, 37(4): 669-676
[5] TOWNSEND P. A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty: A rejoinder to professor Amartya Sen[J]. Oxford economic papers, 1985, 37(4): 659-668
[6] NUSSBAUM M, SEN A. The quality of life[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993: 1-6.
[7] 国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于加强孤儿保障工作的意见[EB/OL].[2019-10-20]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2010/content_1754115.htm.
[8] 国务院. 国务院关于加强困境儿童保障工作的意见[EB/OL].(2016-06-16). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-06/16/content_5082800.htm.
[9] 韩克庆. 社会保障公平性的测量准则与效果评估[J]. 社会保障研究, 2019(3): 82-99
[10] 关信平. 我国低保标准的意义及当前低保标准存在的问题分析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2016(3): 64-71
[11] 韩克庆, 郭瑜. “福利依赖”是否存在?——中国城市低保制度的一个实证研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2012(2): 149-167
[12] 国务院. 国务院关于进一步加强和改进最低生活保障工作的意见[EB/OL].(2012-09-26). http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-09/26/content_2233209.htm
[13] 郭伟和, 丰宝宾. 城市最低生活保障政策瞄准效果研究——基于“中国城乡困难家庭社会政策支持系统建设项目”数据分析[J]. 社会建设, 2016(5): 4-16
[14] 宋扬, 杨乃祺. 最低生活保障制度的瞄准效率与减贫效果分析——基于北京、河南、山西三地的调查[J]. 社会保障研究, 2018(4): 38-47
[15] 关信平. 新时代中国城市最低生活保障制度优化路径: 提升标准与精准识别[J]. 社会保障评论, 2019(1): 131-140
[16] 刘央央, 钟仁耀. 城乡低保对象认定标准中增加支出标准的合理性分析——基于悬崖效应的视角[J]. 社会保障研究, 2019(1): 33-43
[17] 邓大松, 王增文. “硬制度”与“软环境”下的农村低保对象的识别[J]. 中国人口科学, 2008(5): 18-25
[18] 谭溪. 支出型贫困视角下农村社会救助扶贫效果研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2018(8): 192-199
[19] NOTTEN G, GASSMANN F. Size matters: Targeting efficiency and poverty reduction effects of means-tested and universal child benefits in Russia[J]. Journal of European social policy, 2008, 18(3): 260-274
[20] POPOVA D. Distributional impacts of cash allowances for children: A micro-simulation analysis for Russia and Europe[J]. Journal of European social policy, 2016, 26(3): 248-267
[21] GHYSELS J, VAN LANCKER W. The unequal benefits of activation: An analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children[J]. Journal of European social policy, 2011, 21(5): 472-485
[22] 宣飞霞, 王玥. 国外儿童福利模式及孤儿、弃婴救助经验评介[J]. 广东工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013(2): 38-44
[23] 李莹, 韩克庆. 我国困境儿童托底性保障制度的建构[J]. 江淮论坛, 2015(5): 119-126
[24] SHANG X Y, KAREN R FISHER. Everything for the children: Orphans growing up in informal adoptive families in China[J]. Journal of social service research, 2019, 45(2): 166-180
[25] 尚晓援, 伍晓明. 中国农村孤儿保护体制的个案研究[J]. 中国青年研究, 2006(12): 29-35
[26] 邹明明. 孤儿保障对象界定及监护权的思考[J]. 社会福利, 2010(9): 25-26
[27] MÄÄTTÄ M, ERIKSSON K. Network governance and programme steering–rationales and tensions in planning child and youth policies[J]. Social policy & administration, 2015, 49(5): 631-648
[28] BERRICK J D, PECKOVER S, PÖSÖ T, et al. The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis[J]. Journal of European social policy, 2015, 25(4): 366-378
[29] NAKRAY K. Child poverty and ecological contexts of deprivation and well-being: A critical review of budgeting and social policy in India[J]. Social policy & administration, 2015, 49(6): 752-784
[30] 高翔. 政策相关组织的组织化程度对社会政策制定的影响——以比较中美干预儿童虐待政策为基础的分析[J]. 东岳论丛, 2015(3): 10-15
[31] 赵景欣, 刘霞. 农村留守儿童的抑郁和反社会行为: 日常积极事件的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010(6): 634-640
[32] 赵景欣, 杨萍, 马金玲, 等. 歧视知觉与农村留守儿童积极/消极情绪的关系: 亲子亲合的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016(3): 116-123
[33] 谭深. 中国农村留守儿童研究述评[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(1): 138-150
[34] 万国威, 李珊. “留守儿童”福利供应的定量研究——基于四川省兴文县的实证调研[J]. 中国青年研究, 2012(12): 43-49
[35] 吴帆, 杨伟伟. 留守儿童和流动儿童成长环境的缺失与重构——基于抗逆力理论视角的分析[J]. 人口研究, 2011(6): 90-99
[36] LIU J, LIU S, YAN J, et al. The impact of life skills training on behavior problems in left-behind children in rural China: A pilot study[J]. School psychology international, 2016, 37(1): 73-84
[37] ZHAO C, ZHOU X, WANG F, et al. Care for left-behind children in rural China: A realist evaluation of a community-based intervention[J]. Children and youth services review, 2017(82): 239-245
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] WEN Hao, Sile Hu. Academic Stress and Internalizing Problems among Chinese High Schoolers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators and Implications [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 48-61.
[7] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[8] PAN Li, SUN Jie, WANG Yean. A Study on the Mechanism of Building Rural Community Resilience from Co-Production in Township Social Work Stations: Taking the “He Project” in Wangcheng District as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 75-85.
[9] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[10] ZHOU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Jianhua. Research on Policy Regulation to Alleviate the Fertility Problem of the Rural Population in Northeast China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 93-100.
[11] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[12] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[13] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[14] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[15] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!