SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 84-91,100.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Village Elites, Farmers’ Self-Organization and Rural Social Governance Path Innovation: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spring Festival Evening of Villagers in A Village

WANG Tianxia   

  1. School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China
  • Received:2019-06-17 Online:2020-05-15 Published:2020-05-20

Abstract: As social structure is changing, rural social governance faces the dual challenges of “weak public consciousness among farmers” and “a lack of public attributes”. This paper, through case study, finds that the village elites take advantage of villagers’ vernacular complex and ceramics culture to tap internal resources in the village and the new media’s integrative function, hold the cultural feasts through village gala and gradually cultivate the self-organization of rural culture. Such practices provides more possible room for governance innovation in rural community. The effective ways to promote rural social governance in the new era include: to promote the innovation of rural social governance mechanism with the guidance of party building; to give full play to governmental functions and to build triple linkage, an organic connection between communities, social organizations and social workers; to optimize the rural social governance structure, community public participation and public spirit cultivation.

Key words: village elite, farmers’ self-organization, social work, rural social governance

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 李增元. 开放、流动社会中的农村社区治理改革与创新[J]. 社会主义研究, 2014(2): 121-127
[2] 张英魁, 徐彩勤. 当代中国乡村文化遗产保护的困境与治理对策——基于山东省莒县柏庄古村的考察[J]. 长白学刊, 2015(5): 117-126
[3] 贺雪峰. 什么农村, 什么问题[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2008: 214-217.
[4] 李国庆. 关于中国村落共同体的论战——以“戒能—平野论战”为核心[J]. 社会学研究, 2005(6): 194-246
[5] 何雪松. 制度建构的结构基础: “变”与“不变”[J]. 社会科学, 2010(4): 64-67, 189
[6] 汪杰贵. 论我国农民自组织公共参与意识的培育[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 2017(6): 51-56
[7] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2007: 25.
[8] 阎云翔. 私人生活的变革[M]. 上海: 上海书店出版社, 2009: 20.
[9] 徐选国. 从专业性、本土性迈向社区公共性: 理解社会工作本质的新线索[J]. 社会科学战线, 2016(8): 184-193
[10] 黄成亮. 社区公共性何以可能?——中国的论辩与拓展[J]. 中共福建省委党校学报, 2016(3): 104-110
[11] 张诚, 刘祖云. 失落与再造: 后乡土社会乡村公共空间的构建[J]. 学习与实践, 2018(4): 108-115
[12] 田毅鹏, 韩丹. 城市化与“村落终结”[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2011(2): 11-17
[13] 徐理响. 村庄治理能人的产生: 历史嬗变与时代选择[J]. 学习与实践, 2017(8): 56-63
[14] 张英魁, 曲翠洁. 当前中国乡村精英社会流动的内在机制分析[J]. 当代世界与社会主义, 2014(3): 111-116
[15] 曹宗平. 经济新常态下农民工返乡创业的多重动因与特殊作用[J]. 广东社会科学, 2019(3): 23-30, 254
[16] 黄月琴. 新媒介技术视野下的传播与赋权研究[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016(6): 140-145, 164
[17] 田雄, 曹锦清. “事件团结”与村庄生活共同体再造——基于一起乡村事件的实证分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(6): 37-46
[18] 牛耀红. 在场与互训: 微信群与乡村秩序维系——基于一个西部农村的考察[J]. 新闻界, 2017(8): 2-9
[19] 胡泽勇. 新农村建设中农民自组织的再生和发展研究[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2009(8): 38-41
[20] 李万钧. 关于创新基层社会治理的实践与思考[J]. 科学社会主义, 2017(5): 99-105
[21] 卢宪英. 紧密利益共同体自治: 基层社区治理的另一种思路——来自H省移民新村社会治理机制创新效果的启示[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(6): 62-72
[22] 许远旺, 卢璐. 从政府主导到参与式发展: 中国农村社区建设的路径选择[J]. 中州学刊, 2011(1): 120-124
[23] 徐选国, 徐永祥. 基层社会治理中的“三社联动”: 内涵、机制及其实践逻辑——基于深圳市H社区的探索[J]. 社会科学, 2016(7): 87-96
[24] 李晓婷, 窦瑞娜. 以社区教育优化社区治理[J]. 人民论坛, 2019(18): 78-79
[25] 彭惠青, 仝斌. 社会工作在基层治理专业化中的角色与功能[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(1): 46-50
[26] 王东, 王木森. 多元协同与多维吸纳: 社区治理动力生成及其机制构建[J]. 青海社会科学, 2019(3): 126-131, 141
[27] 王欣, 杨君. 再组织化、公共性与社区治理[J]. 长白学刊, 2017(1): 126-132
[28] 王永华, 罗家为. 政府赋权与社工参与: 社区治理的路径选择——基于政社合作的分析视角[J]. 中共天津市委党校学报, 2018(2): 43-49
[29] 李文祥, 高锡林. 社会工作介入与农村社会管理转型[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2015(1): 95-174
[30] 王进文. 社工下乡: 新时代农村社会治理的主体实践[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019(4): 80-88
[31] 何雪松, 袁园. 全球城市的流动性与社会治理[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(6): 37-42, 170
[32] 于水, 姜凯帆. 内生整合与外部嵌入: 农村社会发展模式比较分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(6): 87-93, 151
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[11] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[12] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[13] YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[14] HE Xuesong, WANG Tianqi. 2021 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
[15] HE Jian, LAN Caiguang. Help Others by Mutual Assistance VS. Help Others to Self-Reliance: A New Interpretation of the Localization of Social Work in China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 16-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!