SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 12-20.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Social Work Presence in Epidemic Risk Prevention and Control: Intervention Context, Presence Basis and Professional Examination

WANG Jinwen   

  1. School of Sociology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072, China
  • Received:2020-07-06 Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-01-12

Abstract: The outbreak of COVID-19 epidemic has once again become a window for human beings and risks to test themselves respectively. The global epidemic revealed the traits of risk society characterized by unpredictability, organized irresponsibility and difficulty in public consultation. As a kind of actors, facing the ontological uneasiness, differentiated sharing of risks and multidimensional derivative consequences caused by the epidemic, social work can play its professional advantages in cultivating confidence and trust, adhering to the protection orientation and integrating the three attributes. After the temporary victory of epidemic prevention and control, social work needs to examine its professional practice in abnormal context, and then finds that the triple contradictions between "mobile pause key" and network service lag, "derivative of epidemic situation" and insufficient crossing of disciplinary boundary, "abnormal situation" and isolated autonomous service affect the service effect of social work in practice. In the new era of the growth of national and social governance, social work needs to check and fill in the gaps, improve the practical experience in abnormal situations and expand the boundary of service application and achieve discipline consciousness.

Key words: epidemic prevention and control, social work, actors, boundary crossing, absence of service

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 吉登斯. 现代性的后果[M]. 田禾, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2000: 3-4.
[2] 贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2004: 15-20.
[3] 贝克. 世界风险社会[M]. 吴英姿, 等, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2000: 193.
[4] 贝克, 邓正来, 沈国麟. 风险社会与中国——与德国社会学家乌尔里希·贝克的对话[J]. 社会学研究, 2010(5): 208-231
[5] 吉登斯. 超越左与右——激进主义的未来[M]. 李慧斌, 等, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2000: 132.
[6] 杨伟民. 在“挖出来”与“再联结”之间: 中国大陆本土社会工作发展的新方面[J]. 学海, 2012(2): 69-75
[7] 陈立周. “找回社会”: 中国社会工作转型的关键议题[J]. 思想战线, 2017(1): 101-107
[8] 王进文. 社工下乡: 新时代农村社会治理的主体实践[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2019(4): 80-88
[9] 李佳薇. 重返枫桥: 新冠肺炎疫情防控背景下的社区信息治理刍议[J]. 云南社会科学, 2020(3): 179-185
[10] 王进文, 张军. “关系”视域中农村留守儿童问题的社会工作生态介入[J]. 社会工作, 2018(1): 71-81
[11] HOWARD GOLDSTEIN. The limits and art of understanding in social work practice[J]. Families in society, 1994(4): 385-395
[12] 汪淑媛. 艺术与社会工作实务[J]. 台大社工学刊, 2013(28): 1-46
[13] REAMER FREDERIC G. Social work in digital age: ethical and risk management challenges[J]. Clinical social work journal, 2013, 58(2): 163-172
[14] JACK SARAH L. The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A aualitative analysis[J]. Journal of management studies, 2005, 42(6): 1233-1259
[15] 雷杰. “专业化”还是“去专业化”——论我国社会工作发展的两种话语论述[J]. 中国社会工作研究, 2014(1): 25-39
[16] RICHARD INGRAM. Emotions, social work practice and supervision: An uneasy alliance?[J]. Journal of social work practice, 2012, 27(1): 5-19
[17] 熊跃根. 后现代主义与当代社会工作: 理论与实践的反思[J]. 中国社会工作研究, 2006(1): 129-152
[18] 王思斌. 中国社会工作的嵌入式发展[J]. 社会科学战线, 2011(2): 206-222
[19] 刘振, 徐永祥. 中国社会工作的生成路径与发展困境——基于历史制度主义的分析[J]. 天府新论, 2017(5): 96-103
[20] LINDA WEISS, JOHN HOBSON. States and economic development[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995: 103-105.
[21] 图海纳. 行动者的归来[M]. 舒诗伟, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2008: 6-20.
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[7] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[8] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[9] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[10] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[11] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[12] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[13] GAO Liru. Rural Adolescents’ Excessive Viewing of Short Videos: A Qualitative Study on Fourteen Rural Adolescents [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 55-63.
[14] YANG Hong, CHEN Tao. Multi-Stakeholders Collaboration and Village Governance Supported by Social Work Backbone: Research on the Governance Model of Z Village in Beijing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 80-91.
[15] HE Xuesong, WANG Tianqi. 2021 Annual Review on Social Work Research [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(2): 5-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!