二维政策工具框架下我国临终关怀政策研究

Abstract

Abstract: The hospice care policy has specific guiding significance for the development of hospice care service. Quantitative analysis of 48 policy documents of hospice care, which were issued successively in China from 1994 to 2020, was performed using a two-dimensional framework of policy tools, which took the basic policy tools as X dimension and the development of hospice care as Y dimension. Results show that balanced use of policy tools has not been realized in current policy of China’s hospice care. Environmental policy tools play a dominant role in China’s hospice care policies while demand and supply policy tools are insufficiently used.There is a structural imbalance in the application of basic policy tools.The effectiveness of policy tools has not yet been fully demonstrated and the systemic nature of relevant policies for hospice care is yet to be improved. Based on the results of the analysis, suggestions are made for improving the policy system of hospice care: optimizing policy tools, creating cultural environment and embracing “death” with inner peace.

Key words: hospice care, policy tools, analysis of policy documents

CLC Number:

C916

TANG Yong, CHEN Haiyan, YE Furong, LUO Peng. Research on Hospice Care Policy in China within the Two-Dimensional Framework of Policy Tools[J].SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21(4): 89-98.

References

[1] WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Definition of palliative care[EB/OL]. [2020-01-12]. https://www.who.int/zh/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care.
[2] 梁玉萍. 政策在公共管理中的地位及作用[J]. 中共山西省委党校学报, 2001(6): 57-58
[3] ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W. An assessment of government innovation policies[J]. Review of policy research, 1984, 3(3-4): 436-444
[4] 纪竞垚. 我国老年临终关怀政策: 反思与前瞻[J]. 社会建设, 2017(5): 84-91
[5] 刘继同, 袁敏. 中国大陆临终关怀服务体系的历史、现状、问题与前瞻[J]. 社会工作, 2016(2): 34-49,123-124
[6] 杨美雪, 林为森, 吴聪慧, 等. 健保住院安宁疗护试办计画下之安宁收益及其影响因素[J]. 安宁疗护杂志, 2010(2): 145-160
[7] 唐咏. 临终关怀与社会治理创新[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2018(4): 46-53, 74
[8] 谢琼. 死得其安: 临终关怀服务体系的构建与完善[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(12): 28-32
[9] 苏永刚. “健康中国”视域下的临终关怀[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2019(3): 287-292
[10] 苏永刚, 马娉, 陈晓阳. 英国临终关怀现状分析及对中国的启示[J]. 山东社会科学, 2012(2): 48-54
[11] 胡敏, 刘登, 陈琦, 等. 上海市舒缓疗护人力资源现状的SWOT分析和对策研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019(6): 990-993
[12] 郝燕萍, 李艳媚, 庄静仪, 等. 广州市临终关怀机构资源及现状调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018(3): 412-414
[13] 杨晶, 陈双琴, 秦志伟, 等. 中国老年安宁疗护的研究进展[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020(11): 2458-2463
[14] 刘宇, 李明今. 安宁疗护背景下死亡教育模式的思考[J]. 科技视界, 2018(25): 235-236
[15] 张海强. 临床专业医学生死亡态度及死亡教育需求调查: 以新乡医学院三全学院为例[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2018(18): 61-63
[16] 刘明晶. 探讨如何构建医学生死亡教育课程内容体系[J]. 中国农村卫生, 2018(21): 54-55
[17] 柏宁, 尹梅. 医学视阈下对中西方死亡文化差异的分析[J]. 医学与哲学(A), 2014(5): 21-23
[18] 谭磊. 我国老年社会工作本科人才培养路径研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2016(3): 39-45
[19] 李永娜, 范惠, 李欢欢, 等. 临终关怀的整合模型: 精神、心理与生理的关怀[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2017(1): 61-73
[20] 吕振波, 张晋. 老龄化背景下临终关怀的现状及发展对策研究[J]. 辽宁医学院学报(社会科学版), 2015(1): 21-23
[21] 杨蓉荣. 政府转型视角下的老年临终关怀服务[J]. 唯实, 2018(12): 67-70
[22] 杜鹏, 王永梅. 中国老年临终关怀服务的实践与制度探索[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2015(5): 95-101
[23] 张蓉蓉, 姜叙诚. 社区老年人生前预嘱认知和态度的调查研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2017(3): 192-194
[24] 王福平, 古利明. 尊严死教育在ICU临终患者疗护中的应用[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2014(1): 118-120

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Research on Hospice Care Policy in China within the Two-Dimensional Framework of Policy Tools

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	TANG Yong. Hospice Care and Social Governance Innovation [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 18(4): 46-53,74.
[2]	LIANG Ying, LIU Yixin, ZHANG Guangyu. Mining Analysis of the University Personnel Management Policy Based on Collaborative Innovation Model [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 17(2): 83-87.