SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 75-85.

• SHEHUI GUANLI • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study on the Mechanism of Building Rural Community Resilience from Co-Production in Township Social Work Stations: Taking the “He Project” in Wangcheng District as an Example

PAN Li1, SUN Jie2, WANG Yean1   

  1. 1. School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China;
    2. Kunyuan Social Work Service Center in Wangcheng District, Changsha, Hunan, 410000, China
  • Received:2022-02-23 Online:2022-07-15 Published:2022-07-15

Abstract: In recent years, community resilience has become an important issue in the process of rural revitalisation. As an important vehicle for grassroots governance, social work stations have become a hub for linking government, residents and social organizations and stimulating their interaction and value co-production behaviors, and are an important part of the co-production process, which also effectively promotes community resilience. Taking the “He Project” in Wangcheng District of Changsha City as an example, this study focuses on further clarifying the mechanism of social work stations for building community resilience from the perspective of co-production. The study finds, in the co-production practices of the social work stations, the institutional framework of co-production ensures the legitimacy of community resilience; the complementary capacity of co-production agents can ensure organizational resilience; and the sustainability incentives in co-production can stimulate the endogenous motivation for the continuation of community resilience. Thus, the cultivation of the capacity of co-production agents and the creation of an environment, professional legitimacy and public value constitute a mechanism for promoting community resilience through social work stations leading the practice of co-production.

Key words: co-production, community resilience, “He Project”, grassroots governance innovation

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 董晓婉, 徐煜辉, 李湘梅. 乡村社区韧性研究综述与应用方向探究[J/OL]. [2022-02-22]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5583.TU.20211108.0951.002.html.
[2] 李迎生. 将社会工作纳入国家重大突发公共事件治理体系[J]. 社会建设, 2020(4): 10-13
[3] 徐选国, 陈杏钧. 社会工作介入“社区韧性”的生产机制与“韧性社区”的目标构建——基于对重大疫情防控的经验研究[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(4): 68-76,107-108
[4] 蓝煜昕, 张雪. 社区韧性及其实现路径: 基于治理体系现代化的视角[J]. 行政管理改革, 2020(7): 73-82
[5] 颜德如. 构建韧性的社区应急治理体制[J]. 行政论坛, 2020(3): 89-96
[6] 徐柳怡, 汪涛, 胡玉桃. 后疫情时代韧性社区应急管理的思路与对策——基于武汉市社区应急管理的实践探索[J]. 领导科学, 2021(16): 35-38
[7] 潘泽泉. 湖南“禾计划”: 实现社会工作与民政工作融合式发展[J]. 中国民政, 2021(4): 38-39
[8] 徐蕴, 姜波, 王瑞鸿, 等. 社工站建设之地方实践(三) 湖南“禾计划”: 如何实现从1.0到3.0版本的进阶[J]. 中国社会工作, 2021(4): 14-16
[9] OSTROM E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development[J]. World development, 1996, 24(6): 1073-1087
[10] BROWN D D, KULIG J C. The concepts of resiliency: theoretical lessons from community research[J]. Health and Canadian society, 1996, 4(1): 29-52
[11] PATON D, MILLAR M, JOHNSTON D. Community resilience to volcanic hazard consequences[J]. Natural hazards, 2001, 24(2): 157-169
[12] 吴晓林, 谢伊云. 基于城市公共安全的韧性社区研究[J]. 天津社会科学, 2018(3): 87-92
[13] SONN C C, FISHER A T. Sense of community: community resilient responses to oppression and change[J]. Journal of community psychology, 1998, 26(5): 457-472
[14] AHMED R, SEEDAT M, VAN NIEKERK A, et al. Discerning community resilience in disadvantaged communities in the context of violence and injury prevention[J]. South African journal of psychology, 2004, 34(3): 386-408
[15] NORRIS F H, STEVENS S P, PFEFFERBAUM B, et al. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness[J]. American journal of community psychology, 2008, 41(1): 127-150
[16] MAGIS K. Community resilience: an indicator of social sustainability[J]. Society and natural resources, 2010, 23(5): 401-416
[17] GANOR M, BEN-LAVY Y. Community resilience: lessons derived from gilo under fire[J]. Journal of Jewish communal service, 2003, 79(2/3): 105-108
[18] PFEFFERBAUM R L, PFEFFERBAUM B, VAN HORN R L, et al. The communities advancing resilience toolkit (CART)[J]. Journal of public health management and practice, 2013, 19(3): 250-258
[19] ALFORD J. A public management road less travelled: clients as co-producers of public services[J]. Australian journal of public administration, 1998, 57(4): 128-137
[20] LOEFFLER E, BOVAIRD T. Assessing the impact of co-production on pathways to outcomes in public services: the case of policing and criminal justice[J]. International public management journal, 2020, 23(2): 205-223
[21] VOORBERG W H, BEKKERS V J J M, TUMMERS L G. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey[J]. Public management review, 2015, 17(9): 1333-1357
[22] OSBORNE S P, STROKOSCH K. It takes Two to Tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives[J]. British journal of management, 2013, 24(1): 31-47
[23] FOTAKI M. Towards developing new partnerships in public services: users as consumers, citizens and/or co-producers in health and social care in england and sweden[J]. Public administration, 2011, 89(3): 933-955
[24] PESTOFF V. Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: some crucial conceptual issues[M]//PESTOFF V. New public governance, the third sector, and co-production. New York: Routledge, 2013: 31-52.
[25] ALBRECHTS L. Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective[J]. Planning theory, 2013, 12(1): 46-63
[26] MEES H, CRABBé A, DRIESSEN P P J. Conditions for citizen co-production in a resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance arrangement. a tentative framework[J]. Journal of environmental policy & planning, 2017, 19(6): 827-842
[27] HAUSTEIN E, LORSON P C. Co-creation and co-production in municipal risk governance: a case study of citizen participation in a German city[J]. Public management review, 2021
[28] STEEN T, BRANDSEN T. Coproduction during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: will it last?[J]. Public administration review, 2020, 80(5): 851-855
[29] SZESCILO D. Co-producing local policies through citizens’ panels[J]. Journal of comparative vrban law and policy, 2020, 4(1): 89-95
[30] W.理查德?斯科特. 制度与组织——思想观念与物质利益[M]. 姚伟, 王黎芳, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2010: 61.
[31] 湖南省民政厅. 实施“禾计划”激发新动能 推动湖南“五化民政”建设高质量发展[J]. 中国民政, 2020(20): 9.
[32] 徐蕴, 张丽霞. 1600个乡镇社工站是怎样炼成的[J]. 中国社会工作, 2019(25): 15-16
[33] 施生旭, 周晓琳, 郑逸芳. 韧性社区应急治理: 逻辑分析与策略选择[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021(3): 85-91
[34] 王勇. 组织韧性的构念、测量及其影响因素[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2016(4): 120-128
[35] 张海波. 风险社会视野中的公共管理变革[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学?人文科学?社会科学), 2017(4): 57-65,158
[36] BRANDSEN T, STEEN T, VERSCHUERE B. Co-production and co-creation: engaging citizens in public services[M]. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2018: 82-102.
[37] 王磊, 王青芸. 韧性治理: 后疫情时代重大公共卫生事件的常态化治理路径[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(6): 75-82, 111-112
[38] MEYER J P, IRVING P G, ALLEN N J. Examination of the combined effects of work values and early work experiences on organizational commitment[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 1998, 19(1): 29-52
[39] JASPERS S, STEEN T. The sustainability of outcomes in temporary co-production[J]. International journal of public sector management, 2019, 33(1): 62-77
[40] 王杰, 徐选国. 我国社会工作的合法性困境及其路径重构[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(2): 41-49
[41] 徐家良, 许源. 合法性理论下政府购买社会组织服务的绩效评估研究[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2015(6): 187-195
[42] 张和清, 廖其能, 等. 从群众中来 到群众中去——“双百”社会工作概论[M]. 北京: 中国社会出版社, 2021: 304-338.
[43] 王学军. 价值共创: 公共服务合作生产的新趋势[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2020(1): 23-32
[44] MOORE M H. Creating public value: strategic management in government[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1995: 27-56.
[45] 王学军, 张弘. 公共价值的研究路径与前沿问题[J]. 公共管理学报, 2013(2): 126-136, 144
[46] BOZEMAN B. Public-value failure: when efficient markets may not do[J]. Public administration review, 2002, 62(2): 145-161
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] WEN Hao, Sile Hu. Academic Stress and Internalizing Problems among Chinese High Schoolers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators and Implications [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 48-61.
[7] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[8] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[9] ZHOU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Jianhua. Research on Policy Regulation to Alleviate the Fertility Problem of the Rural Population in Northeast China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 93-100.
[10] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[11] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[12] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[13] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[14] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
[15] GAO Liru. Rural Adolescents’ Excessive Viewing of Short Videos: A Qualitative Study on Fourteen Rural Adolescents [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 55-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!