SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 5-14.

• SHEHUI GONGZUO •    

Value Reconstruction, Scene Shaping and Action Empowerment: Three Foundations for Social Work to Participate in the Community Construction of Community Environmental

LUO Qiao, TANG Haoran   

  1. College of Public Management of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China
  • Received:2022-04-25 Published:2022-09-21

Abstract: Environmental governance is an important way to promote the modernization of the harmonious symbiosis between man and nature. As a basic unit of society, communities have received attention from the fields of social sciences. Environmental social work, a branch of social work, takes differentiated care as a starting point to conduct practical explorations of community governance. At the level of values, social work can try to reconstruct an “environment-society” compound justice concept on the basis of shallow ecology and deep ecology. At the level of scenario theory, social work should examine the transition from focusing on environmental education to cooperating with the public and other diverse subjects to solve current environmental problems, and trying to shape an environmental governance community based on community belonging. At the level of power relations, an inter-subjective action empowerment method is created to provide a practical basis for social work to participate in the construction of a community environmental governance community.

Key words: value reconstruction, scene shaping, action empowerment, environmental and social work, environmental governance community

CLC Number: 

  • C916
[1] 洪大用. 环境社会学[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021: 4-5.
[2] 马小明, 赵月炜. 环境管制政策的局限性与变革——自愿性环境政策的兴起[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2005(6): 19-23
[3] 徐再荣. 20世纪美国环保运动与环境政策研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2013: 143-152.
[4] 鸟越皓之. 环境社会学: 站在生活者的角度思考[M]. 宋金文, 译. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2009: 117-126.
[5] 洪大用. 社会变迁与环境问题[M]. 北京: 首都师范大学出版社, 2001: 251.
[6] 民政部党组理论学习中心组专题学习《中共中央 国务院关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见》[J]. 中国民政, 2021(16): 9.
[7] 孙金龙. 深入学习贯彻习近平生态文明思想 加快构建人与自然和谐共生的现代化[J]. 环境保护, 2022(Z2): 8-10
[8] 陈涛. 环境治理的社会学研究: 进程、议题与前瞻[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(1): 53-62,107
[9] 颜德如, 张玉强. 中国环境治理研究(1998—2020): 理论、主题与演进趋势[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2021(3): 144-157
[10] 洪大用. 经济增长、环境保护与生态现代化——以环境社会学为视角[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(9): 82-99,207
[11] 顾金土, 邓玲, 吴金芳, 等. 中国环境社会学十年回眸[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011(2): 29-35,91
[12] 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会. 中共中央关于党的百年奋斗重大成就和历史经验的决议[N]. 人民日报, 2021-11-17(01).
[13] 陈星星, 徐选国. 绿色社会工作: 迈向生态环境关怀的社会工作新论述——兼论对我国社会工作介入生态文明建设的启示[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(3): 1-10
[14] 罗桥. 环境社会工作: 概念、价值观与实践路径[J]. 学习与探索, 2020(2): 43-51,199
[15] 古学斌, 齐华栋, LENA DOMINELLI. 空间正义与绿色社会工作介入: 四川雅安灾后参与式社区设计的行动研究[J]. 中国社会工作研究, 2020(1): 1-21,216
[16] 王芳, 曹方源. 迈向社区环境治理体系现代化: 理念、实践与转型路径[J]. 学习与实践, 2021(8): 106-116
[17] 苑琳, 崔煊岳. 政府绿色治理创新: 内涵、形势与战略选择[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(11): 151-154
[18] 罗桥, 汤皓然. 社会工作介入环境治理的理论基础与路径选择[J]. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(1): 97-106
[19] 张和清, 尚静. 社会工作干预与中国乡村生态、生计和生活可持续发展的行动研究——以绿耕项目为例[J]. 社会学研究, 2021(6): 68-89,227-228
[20] 李培超. 伦理拓展主义的颠覆——西方环境伦理思潮研究[M]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学出版社, 2004: 140.
[21] THOMPSON S, BARTON M. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment[J]. Journal of environmental psychology, 1994, 14(2): 149-157
[22] 闫伟. 论深层生态学对浅层生态学和技术悲观主义的超越[J]. 惠州学报, 2014(2): 61-65
[23] 程鹏立. 环境社会工作: 理论、实务与教育[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(6): 94-103
[24] 王耘. 论浅层生态哲学的话语体系[J]. 兰州学刊, 2008(5): 187-190,186
[25] 童敏. 社会工作理论——历史环境下社会服务实践者的声音与智慧[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019: 60-69.
[26] 雷毅. 深层生态学思想研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1999: 78-84.
[27] 赵光旭. 华兹华斯生态学研究与生态批评的深层与浅层[J]. 山东外语教学, 2011(6): 84-88,92
[28] 莉娜·多米内利. 绿色社会工作: 从环境危机到环境正义[M]. 王景迁, 齐文华, 吴玥, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019: 7-10.
[29] 罗桥, 吴琛杭, 秦小峰. 气候变化治理: 一个环境社会工作的视角[J]. 新视野, 2021(6): 70-76,83
[30] MAURIE J COHEN. Science and the environment: assessing cultural capacity for ecological modernization[J]. Public understanding of science, 1998, 7(2): 149-167
[31] 赵绘宇. 生态系统保护的东西方生态哲学省思[C]//中国可持续发展研究会. 2006年中国可持续发展论坛——中国可持续发展研究会2006学术年会经济发展与人文关怀专辑. 北京: 中国可持续发展研究会学术年会, 2006: 55-58.
[32] 包庆德, 夏承伯. 生态创新之维: 深层生态学思想研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2008(3): 68-78
[33] BESTHORN F H. Deep ecology’s contributions to social work: a ten-year retrospective[J]. International journal of social welfare, 2012, 21(3): 248-259
[34] 和莉莉, 吴钢. 我国环境NGO的发展及其在推进可持续发展中的作用[J]. 环境保护, 2008(14): 57-60
[35] 阿尔弗雷德·舒茨. 社会世界的意义构成[M]. 游淙祺, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012.
[36] 林丽英. 当前我国环境NGO的发展环境研究[J]. 中国环境管理丛书, 2004(1): 9-11
[37] 马国栋. 环保非政府组织发展的抑制性关系问题探讨[J]. 学会, 2007(5): 18-22
[38] O’FAIRCHEALLAIGH C. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making[J]. Environmental impact assessment review, 2009, 30(1): 19-27
[39] 张佳刚, 杜以芬. 环境保护领域“政府失灵”的原因探析[J]. 黑河学刊, 2012(12): 13-14
[40] 曾粤兴, 魏思婧. 构建公众参与环境治理的“赋权—认同—合作”机制——基于计划行为理论的研究[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2017(10): 169-176
[41] GUTIRREZ L M, LEWIS E A. Empowering women of color[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999: 21-34.
[42] 陈树强. 增权: 社会工作理论与实践的新视角[J]. 社会学研究, 2003(5): 70-83
[43] 梁彦隆. 主体间性与环境问题——兼谈生态伦理与可持续发展[J]. 科学技术与辩证法, 2004(2): 1-4,12
[44] 米丽娟. 主体间性视阈下交往行为的合理性与和谐社会建构[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(6): 178-183
[45] 张浩军. 主体间性与构造: 论舒茨对胡塞尔的批评[J]. 哲学研究, 2018(3): 100-108
[1] TONG Min, WU Baohong. From Heroism to Civilian Care: Reflection and Reconstruction of Social Work Ethics [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 5-12.
[2] ZHAO Fang, KONG Chunyan. A Research on the Practice of Social Work Ethics Based on Relationship [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 13-19.
[3] HE Longtao, WU Han. Teaching and Training Model for Building Reflexivity in Coping with Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 20-30.
[4] QIN Haibo, LI Yukun, ZHAO Yanyan, CHENG Haiyuan. Will Higher Wages Retain Social Workers? The Moderating Effect of Job Autonomy [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 31-40.
[5] JIN Shuheng, DAI Haijing. Community Incivilities and Migrant Mothers’ Feelings of Safety: Considering Social Work Space Intervention [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 41-47.
[6] WEN Hao, Sile Hu. Academic Stress and Internalizing Problems among Chinese High Schoolers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators and Implications [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 48-61.
[7] LEI Jie, YI Xuejiao, ZHANG Zhongmin. Administration-Led Neo-Managerialism: Building of Township (Street) Social Work Stations and Government Purchase of Social Work Services. A Case Study of “He Plan” in A City of Hunan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 62-74.
[8] PAN Li, SUN Jie, WANG Yean. A Study on the Mechanism of Building Rural Community Resilience from Co-Production in Township Social Work Stations: Taking the “He Project” in Wangcheng District as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 75-85.
[9] YU Tieshan, JU Zheng. Mutual Embedment of Politics and Professionalism: A Study on the Development of Party Construction and Advanced Service of Social Work Institutions. Taking 27 Social Work Institutions in D City in Guangdong as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 86-92.
[10] ZHOU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Jianhua. Research on Policy Regulation to Alleviate the Fertility Problem of the Rural Population in Northeast China [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(4): 93-100.
[11] WEN Jun, AO Shufeng. From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploration of the Local Practice Path of Volunteering: Taking X District of Wuxi City as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 5-12.
[12] HAN Yangdi, HUANG Cuiping, ZHANG Xuefeng, WANG Chendi, LI Xiangpu. “Chengxi” Mutual Support: Living with Hope Program for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in an Evidence-Informed Approach: Taking the Department of Oncology of Shanghai H Hospital as an Example [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 13-22.
[13] ZHAO Di, ZHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Wei. Identification through Professionalization: A Qualitative Study on the Subjective Status Identification of Social Workers in Nanjing [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 23-34.
[14] CHEN Beibei. Crisis Response of Social Work Institutions under Classification: Based on the Survey of H City, Hubei Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 35-44.
[15] SHI Yiwen, ZHOU Jing. Research on Social Work Service Model of Left-Behind Children in China’s Ethnic Minority Areas from Integration: Based on the Needs Assessment of Left-Behind Ethnic Minority Children in Y County, Yunnan Province [J]. SOCIAL WORK AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22(3): 45-54.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!